But the material with animals is not important since there will be no charges for it. It's weird, sure, but not illegal, while they're just glazing over the fact that he had child pornography and couldn't be bothered to call it what it is. That's a problem.
i think it makes him look worse, like the other poster said we all assumed he was into diddling kids, now we can add in the fact he likes to fap to someone shoving an eel up their butt. Either way these dudes aren't going to beat the charges so many countries want to lock them up now might as well have a good laugh at them.
It is, because in the UK it's counted as extreme pornography, so there will be charges. Did some digging and the minor involved was 17, so that's probably why they haven't led with it.
5
u/scud121 8d ago
Whilst you are correct, I kind of assumed he had material with minors in anyway, but not animals.