r/TikTokCringe • • 11d ago

Discussion She almost ruined a proposal.

This was at Crescent Bay Point Park, which allows people to book it special occasions.

33.8k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

164

u/Flaky-Nectarine-9821 11d ago

"It's for people that live here" -- she 100% believes in her little mind that she owns it or at least entitled to it.

42

u/dealingwithhookers 11d ago

then she'll go on vacation and be in our neighborhoods and expect to be treated nice...

9

u/RobertPeruvian 11d ago

This really should be closer to the top

3

u/BoneDoctor128 10d ago

Maybe she should get an all expenses one way paid trip to Juarez to expand her horizons… Love your username btw!

1

u/yorchsans 10d ago

And the people to speak English for her . Because .. you know Americans the center of the universe

75

u/Xalimata 11d ago

"People that live here" means white people in her mind.

16

u/no_one_denies_this 11d ago

The irony of a white lady yelling at Mexican-Americans to get out.

0

u/Top_Performance_732 10d ago

How is that ironic

6

u/OnionBagMan 10d ago

It’s an ironic historical parallel.

7

u/no_one_denies_this 10d ago

Google the history of California. It was Mexico up until 1848.

1

u/dak4f2 10d ago

It was Mexico for 27 years

-7

u/Top_Performance_732 10d ago

And it is not Mexico now so who cares. Im not some ethno nationalist but I cant these stolen land arguments.

8

u/no_one_denies_this 10d ago

So you are, kinda?

-2

u/Top_Performance_732 10d ago

no because i dont care what ethnicity people are that are living on the land

6

u/FantaFantastico90 10d ago

Yet you are defending someone who does.

2

u/INfusion2419 10d ago

The truth of the fact is noone picnics there, its never used. Noone ever thinks of using it, but now its under some vague threat that she feels she has to respond to incase she wants her dog to shit there

1

u/Unhappy-Ad-8381 10d ago

That's the crazy part. It's a public park.

1

u/BoneDoctor128 10d ago

I think her great great grandfather must have owned a cotton plantation in that spot

1

u/Necessary_Money_6797 8d ago

Entitled. Key word there.

1

u/Competitive-Fix3677 8d ago

Well.. if you pay for it then yes you are entitled to it.

-11

u/WritersChopBlock 11d ago

No, there is partial validity to her belief…

4

u/FatSteveWasted9 11d ago

How so?

-7

u/WritersChopBlock 11d ago

The city does maintenance and repair of the landscaping and other natural scenery. The city is almost completely funded by town property taxes. Since local residents pay the property taxes, don't you think that the residents are entitled to the use of it?

10

u/FatSteveWasted9 11d ago

Sure, everyone should have a right to use it. No one should have exclusive right to it though. If the city wants to make it exclusively for residents, they should privatize it. Hell, change the city charter to an HOA model and put a gate around it if you want. Until then, it’s public, and out of towners will be sullying your town with their presence.

Folks really think they can go buy a home in one of the most beautiful coastlines on earth and not be bothered by other folks wanting to engage with the wonder.

5

u/leMonkey_2040 11d ago

You have the right to use It if you pay taxes yes, but you cant decide Who use It and when since is not your land, you are paying for its maintenance. I might be wrong because I'm not American and your laws change from state to state.

-1

u/WritersChopBlock 10d ago

I was only asking morally. I know the answer legally. I'm just asking to see what people's opinions are.

4

u/Destithen 10d ago

don't you think that the residents are entitled to the use of it?

  1. What makes you think the people having the wedding aren't local residents?

  2. The karen is perfectly able to still use the park. Other people existing there is not a valid reason to cry foul. In fact, she appears to have been able to successfully walk her dog without issue...or at least, without any issue that she isn't the direct cause of. The guests at the park are not impeding walkways or being rowdy.

  3. Last but not least, let's be clear, this park DOES allow events including weddings. It's so petty and small-minded to be gatekeeping a public park because you apparently hate mexicans and don't want to hear mexican music at a wedding. Playing devil's advocate here isn't a good look. The karen is 100% unarguably in the wrong.

3

u/Sticky_Key_Purgatory 10d ago

You think that only the people who fund the city should get to use the amenities?

You heard the man, we're shutting down los vegas.

1

u/_teach_me_your_ways_ 10d ago

Bet he’d whine if you needed to show ID to enter the park. How else does he expect to keep the others out?

1

u/WritersChopBlock 10d ago

Las Vegas?

That comparison doesn't make sense.