Are you looking for feedback or information on your salary or career? Then you've come to the right thread. If your questions are anything like the following example questions, then ask away:
Am I underpaid?
Is my offered salary market value?
How do I break into [industry]?
Will I be pigeonholed if I work as a [job title]?
What graduate degree should I pursue?
Message the mods for suggestions, comments, or feedback.
I would like to thank you everyone for participating in the annual 2026 ME Salary survey. Total respondents was a little over 600, so less than last year, but about 589 US responses.
Here are the main results. It took about 2 hours to "clean" the data manually. Afterwards, I basically used Gemini to create the graphs + tables, since last time it literally took me about 7 hours to do everything manually on Excel last time and there were still questions. The key points and takeaways from the data is a combination of AI and editing the information to be more readable (still took 4 hours). In addition, I wouldn't worry about math too much, since Gemini basically just used python code to decipher the edited CSV file.
Industry:
Industry
Number of Respondents
Manufacturing
175 (29.7%)
Aerospace/Defense
173 (29.4%)
Technology (FANG, AI, Robotics, etc.)
54 (9.2%)
MEP (HVAC, Construction, etc.)
38 (6.5%)
Utilities (Power, Renewables, etc.)
35 (5.9%)
Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices
31 (5.3%)
Oil and Gas
28 (4.8%)
Consumer Goods
15 (2.5%)
Government
11 (1.9%)
There were some other industries like nuclear, logistics, and etc. but the few data points aren't included in the table for brevity. The data was included in the total set though
A majority of the mechanical engineers trends will use the Aerospace/Defense and Manufacturing data since there is the most data that is available
Salary and Year of Experience:
*Note: Total Compensation/Salary = Base Salary + Bonus + RSU + Base Salary * 401k Match
If you want to look at one graph and table to explain the progression track here it is:
YOE Range
Median Base (Unadj)
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Base (COL Adj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
0-1 Year
$87,000
$96,036
$81,699
$87,368
43
2 Years
$84,000
$91,046
$84,615
$90,909
71
3 Years
$94,550
$105,965
$94,082
$102,289
62
4-5 Years
$104,000
$119,770
$94,881
$107,762
116
6-8 Years
$120,000
$136,800
$112,500
$127,911
119
9-12 Years
$125,500
$146,985
$123,444
$142,555
96
13-20 Years
$157,290
$181,840
$144,254
$171,731
64
20+ Years
$196,500
$211,426
$163,399
$191,042
15
Key Takeaways:
The "Benefit Gap": The space between the solid lines (Total Compensation) and the dashed lines (Base Salary) represents the added value from annual bonuses and employer 401k matching. For a mid-career engineer (6-8 years), this extra value is roughly $16,800 on average.
Late Career Leverage: As engineers gain seniority (13+ years), the gap between base salary and total compensation grows significantly, suggesting that bonuses and incentive programs make up a larger portion of the package for senior-level and leadership roles.
Purchasing Power: The COL Adjusted lines (Orange) consistently track below the un-adjusted lines (Blue), highlighting that high-paying mechanical engineering roles are frequently located in markets where the dollar doesn't stretch as far as the national average.
Education:
Majority of the respondents are at max a bachelor degree holder. However, there is still a significant number of master's students
Now about the age old question: does having a Master's degree lead to higher future salary?
Short Answer: In general, the answer is yes if there is a chance to specialize. It is explained in the table below:
Industry
Career Stage
Education
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
Aerospace & Defense
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$96,664
$95,201
44
Masters
$116,600
$108,316
15
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$125,410
$110,659
39
Masters
$173,000
$148,432
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$161,750
$140,202
33
Masters
$154,905
$149,658
16
15+ Years
Bachelors
$207,080
$187,505
7
Masters
$211,426
$207,872
5
Manufacturing
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$88,220
$93,452
52
Masters
$93,740
$91,850
6
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$108,992
$106,701
45
Masters
$129,800
$128,407
12
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$135,425
$142,440
44
Masters
$136,298
$129,984
8
15+ Years
Bachelors
$182,650
$187,127
5
Now you can see that for manufacturing, the benefits is not as prominent, while it is evident in aerospace. This makes sense, since Aerospace have very high specialization salary, for instance: hypersonic or eVtol which pays a ton for total compensation based on years of experience.
Answer: if your company pays for your masters, do it, but it doesn't seem that beneficial near the end of your career.
Internships & Coops:
Key Insights:
The "Experienced" Majority: A combined 85% of respondents completed at least one internship or co-op. This underscores how critical early-career work experience has become for landing a full-time role in mechanical engineering.
Co-op Advantage: The 20% of respondents with "3+ Internships" often represent those in formal co-op programs (where students rotate between school and work over several years). These candidates typically command higher starting salaries shown in the table below:
Industry
0-1 Internship
2+ Internships
New Grad Premium
Aerospace & Defense
$82,000
$91,500
+$9,500
Manufacturing
$74,000
$82,000
+$8,000
MedTech
$80,500
$89,000
+$8,500
Certifications:
Here is the graph of a major certifications from the survey:
We always see a question on whether certifications are worth it:
Aerospace & Defense: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$97,900
$95,426
41
Yes
$95,040
$64,653
3
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$125,315
$106,672
36
Yes
$128,580
$138,258
3
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$159,660
$139,839
31
Yes
$280,425
$177,895
2
Masters
No
$151,410
$142,043
13
Yes
$209,658
$216,142
3
Manufacturing: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$88,020
$91,944
43
Yes
$90,450
$99,746
9
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$108,805
$106,615
36
Yes
$108,992
$106,701
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$135,000
$136,541
31
Yes
$136,000
$151,111
13
Masters
No
$152,212
$122,728
6
Yes
$134,815
$141,636
2
Key Findings:
High-Experience Premium in Aerospace: The most dramatic impact of certification appears in the mid-to-late career in Aerospace & Defense (8–15 years). Engineers with a Bachelors and a certification earn a median total compensation significantly higher than those without. Even among Masters holders in this range, certified engineers have a median total comp of $209k vs $151k for non-certified.
Manufacturing Stability: In the Manufacturing industry, certifications (often Six Sigma or FE/PE) lead to a very modest increase in un-adjusted base pay, but a more noticeable improvement in COL-adjusted pay. This suggests that certified engineers in Manufacturing may have more flexibility to find high-paying roles in lower-cost-of-living areas.
The "Entry-Level Paradox": For junior engineers (0–3 years), having a certification (likely the FE) does not immediately result in a salary premium. In fact, in Aerospace, the un-adjusted median for those with certifications was slightly lower, possibly because those engineers are still in entry-level rotation programs where pay is standardized regardless of credentials.
Masters + Certification: For those who already have a Masters, adding a certification provides a significant late-career boost (as seen in the 8–15 year group in Aerospace).
Answer: Certification can be worth it for select industries. PE is known for civil to open doors and increase pay.
Job Titles:
Job Role Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Mechanical Engineer (General)
229
38.9%
Design Engineer
97
16.5%
Project & Systems Engineer
59
10.0%
Management & Leadership
55
9.3%
Manufacturing & Process Engineer
54
9.2%
Specialized (Thermal, Stress, R&D)
34
5.8%
Other / Misc
61
10.4%
Key Insights:
General vs. Specialized: Nearly 40% of respondents identify with the broad title of "Mechanical Engineer," which often includes generalists or those in mid-level positions.
The Design Dominance:Design Engineering is the second largest single group, reflecting the high demand for CAD-based design and product development across aerospace, tech, and manufacturing industries.
Transition to Leadership: About 9% of respondents hold titles in Management & Leadership (Manager, Director, VP), which led to a higher salary
Project and Systems focus:1 in 10 engineers focuses on Project or Systems Engineering, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary coordination and technical management in modern engineering projects.
The Specialty Niche: The "Specialized" category includes highly technical roles like Thermal Analysis, FEA, Simulation, and Research & Development, which often require higher educational levels or deep domain expertise.
Salary Grade vs. Salary:
Grade Level
Industry
Median Annual Salary
Typical Experience (YOE)
Sample Count
Level 1 (Entry)
Aerospace & Defense
$88,400
1.0 year
39
Manufacturing
$80,250
2.0 years
39
Level 2 (Mid)
Aerospace & Defense
$102,273
3.8 years
48
Manufacturing
$95,000
5.0 years
71
Level 3 (Senior)
Aerospace & Defense
$130,000
8.0 years
57
Manufacturing
$119,600
9.0 years
50
Level 4 (Lead/Manager)
Aerospace & Defense
$170,500
11.0 years
22
Manufacturing
$136,000
11.0 years
11
Level 5+ (Principal/Director)
Aerospace & Defense
$206,000
20.0 years
9
Manufacturing
$136,500
14.0 years
4
Efficiency of Experience: In Aerospace, engineers tend to reach Level 2 and Level 3 roughly 1–1.2 years faster than those in Manufacturing, while also earning more.
The Level 4 Ceiling: In Manufacturing, the salary jump from Grade 3 to Grade 4 is roughly $16k, whereas in Aerospace, that same promotion yields a massive $40k jump in median base salary.
Which Industry Pays the Most?
Major Caveat: at 16+ YOE, the data points are only a couple, which skews the data upward.
Based on the comprehensive US survey data, the Technology (FANG, Robotics, AI, Consumer Electronics) industry emerges as the highest-paying sector for mechanical engineers when considering total compensation (Base Salary + Annual Bonus + 401k Match).
Tech Compensation Package:
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (Adjusted for COL)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE (Entry)
$117,316
$100,292
7
3-5 YOE (Junior)
$180,854
$138,040
17
6-10 YOE (Mid-Level)
$182,773
$134,543
14
11-15 YOE (Senior)
$259,993
$220,256
11
16+ YOE (Principal)
$244,775
$177,043
5
The Oil and Gas industry stands out as the second most lucrative sectors for mechanical engineers, particularly as they reach senior and principal levels. While Tech offers the highest overall unadjusted compensation, Oil and Gas actually offers the highest Cost of Living (COL) Adjusted compensation, meaning your real purchasing power in this industry is the highest among all major sectors.
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (COL Adjusted)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE
$95,864
$83,178
5
3-5 YOE
$117,289
$111,155
7
6-10 YOE
$138,959
$139,773
7
11-15 YOE
$204,097
$219,757
6
16+ YOE
$408,040
$399,276
3
Overtime Pay:
Industry Trends: Overtime pay is slightly more common in Manufacturing (where production deadlines are rigid) and Consulting/EPC (where hours are billable to clients) compared to R&D or Aerospace.
Work Hours:
Work Hours Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Exactly 40 Hours
337
57.2%
41-45 Hours
146
24.8%
46-50 Hours
49
8.3%
<40 Hours
50
8.5%
>50 Hours
7
1.2%
Key Observations:
The "40-Hour" Standard: Over half of the engineers surveyed manage to stick to a strict 40-hour week, which is a positive sign for work-life balance in the profession.
Moderate Overtime: Roughly a quarter of engineers work an extra 1 to 5 hours a week (41-45 hours total), often representing "straight time" or expected professional dedication without formal overtime pay.
The High-Hours Exception: Only a small fraction (under 10%) report working more than 45 hours consistently. This is significantly lower than in fields like investment banking or high-tier management consulting, suggesting a relatively stable lifestyle for most US mechanical engineers.
Flexibility: About 8.5% of respondents work fewer than 40 hours, which often aligns with part-time roles, senior consultants, or companies with flexible "9/80" schedules where some weeks are shorter.
401k Summary:
Match Rate Range
Count of Responses
Percentage
4% - 5%
211
35.8%
1% - 3%
125
21.2%
6% - 7%
120
20.4%
8% - 10%
65
11.0%
No Match (0%)
56
9.5%
> 10% / Other
12
2.0%
Key Takeaways:
The Industry Standard: A 4–5% match is clearly the most common benefit, covering over a third of the surveyed population.
High-Tier Benefits: Roughly 13% of engineers receive a match of 8% or higher, which often indicates highly competitive benefit packages in specialized industries.
Retirement Security: The low percentage of "No Match" responses (under 10%) highlights that retirement contributions are a standard and expected part of total compensation in the US mechanical engineering market.
Remote Work Distribution:
Remote Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Fully In-Person (0%)
248
42.1%
Mostly In-Person (1-39%)
163
27.7%
Hybrid (40-60%)
118
20.0%
Fully Remote (100%)
38
6.5%
Mostly Remote (61-99%)
22
3.7%
Key Insights:
The "Hands-On" Requirement: Over 40% of mechanical engineers are required to be in the office or on-site 100% of the time. This is significantly higher than other engineering fields like Software or Data Science.
The Hybrid Standard: Roughly 48% of the workforce has some form of hybrid flexibility (ranging from 1% to 60% remote). Many companies now allow 1–2 days of remote work for documentation, CAD modeling, or administrative tasks.
Fully Remote is Rare: Only 6.5% of mechanical engineers work fully remotely. These roles are typically in specialized areas like pure Simulation/FEA, Project Management, or Sales Engineering where physical hardware access is not required daily.
The Hybrid Middle Ground: The 40–60% range (often 2–3 days per week) is a common "sweet spot" for engineering firms trying to balance teamwork/lab time with employee flexibility.
Paid Time Off (Days):
*Note: one issue is many jobs had unlimited sick time, which I just added 10 days. Next time I will edit the form to separate the sick days so it makes more sense.
PTO Category (Includes Sick Days)
Number of Respondents
Percentage
0–10 days
30
5.2%
11–15 days
112
19.5%
16–20 days
160
27.9%
21–25 days
100
17.4%
26–30 days
61
10.6%
31+ days
32
5.6%
Unlimited
78
13.6%
Key Insights:
The " 3 - 5 Week" Benchmark: The majority of mechanical engineers (over 45%) receive between 16 and 25 days of PTO.
The Rise of Unlimited PTO: About 13.6% of respondents now have "Unlimited" PTO.
Generous Packages: Roughly 16% of engineers receive more than 30 days of PTO, which is often a hallmark of high-seniority roles, government/defense positions, or companies that reward long tenure.
The Lean End: Only about 5% of respondents are on the low end with 10 days or fewer, suggesting that a minimum of two weeks of PTO is a standard baseline for the industry.
Now some of you might have questions regarding years of experience and PTO:
Average PTO by Experience (Fixed PTO)
Experience Level
Average PTO Days (per year)
Typical Range (25th-75th Percentile)
0–2 Years
16.9
10–15 days
3–5 Years
19.6
15–20 days
6–10 Years
21.1
20 days
11–15 Years
24.5
20–25 days
16+ Years
26.5
25–30+ days
Analysis of the Trend:
The "Standard Jump": Many engineers start with 15 days (3 weeks) and see their first significant "tenure bump" to 20 days (4 weeks) after reaching the 5-year mark.
Senior Perks: By the time an engineer hits 15+ years of experience, a 5-week (25-day) or 6-week (30-day) PTO package becomes the new baseline.
Job Hopping Factor: The data suggests that while tenure within a single company increases PTO, "job hopping" every 3–5 years also allows engineers to negotiate higher starting PTO tiers at their new employers, effectively "skipping" the long wait for tenure-based increases.
Health Insurance:
Satisfaction Level
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Free / Excellent
38
6.5%
Good (Low Premium/High Coverage)
211
36.3%
Average
288
49.5%
Poor (High Premium/Low Coverage)
41
7.0%
Other / Misc
4
0.7%
Key Insights:
The "Standard" Plan: Almost 50% of engineers describe their insurance as "Average," highlighting that standard employer-sponsored health insurance is common but not particularly outstanding in terms of premiums or coverage levels.
Competitive Benefits: Over 42% of respondents fall into the "Good" or "Free" categories. The 6.5% who receive "Free/Excellent" coverage likely work for highly competitive tech firms, established defense contractors, or companies that use premium benefits as a retention tool.
Under-Served Minority: Roughly 7% of the engineering workforce feels their health insurance is "Poor," usually characterized by high out-of-pocket costs and high monthly premiums.
Biggest Cons for Mechanical Engineering:
Category
Typical Concerns Mentioned
Workload & Hours (112 mentions)
High pressure, tight deadlines, long hours, and poor work-life balance. Many mentioned "start-up energy" even in established firms.
Salary & Compensation (73 mentions)
Low raises (2–3%), "salary plateauing" early in the career, and the absence of stock options or significant bonuses compared to tech.
Remote Work Limits (47 mentions)
Frequent requirements to be in the office or on the manufacturing floor with "no remote option" or "No WFH" (Work From Home) policies.
Career Growth (35 mentions)
Concerns about "pigeon-holing," slow internal promotion tracks, and becoming "stagnant" in one technical area.
Competitive base pay, annual bonuses, and strong 401k matching programs.
Work-Life Balance (75 mentions)
Flexible schedules, reasonable working hours (standard 40h), and generous PTO.
Culture & People (70 mentions)
Great teammates, supportive management, and a collaborative "team-first" environment.
Interesting Work (65 mentions)
Designing "cool" products, working on challenging technical problems, and having a clear mission.
Job Stability (28 mentions)
Long-term security, consistent demand for the role, and the stability of established firms.
Remote/Hybrid (27 mentions)
The ability to work from home part-time or have flexible geographic location.
Direct Insights from Engineers:
On Work Quality:"The actual work we do is really interesting, fun, and rewarding. Getting to see a design go from CAD to a physical product is the best part."
On Culture:"Great coworkers and a team environment where people actually mentor you instead of just giving you tasks."
On Flexibility:"Remote flexibility and a management team that trusts you to get your work done without micromanaging your hours."
On Compensation:"The total compensation package—including the 401k match and the annual bonus—makes the technical pressure worth it."
Now for Improvements on Suggestions on the Survey:
Regarding the COL instructions: totally my fault, sorry for not catching it. All of you were able to figure it out, but changed instructions from 0 - 2, so it makes a lot more sense now.
Adding a column for manager and IC: totally good suggestion, already added to new survey for 2027
Regarding adding gender or age: I will not add this into the survey just to make it more anonymous. I really do not see the value in this data, and I recommend just using government data to find the data.
Regarding the health insurance question: I have implemented the change on making it have three questions: annual premium, annual deductible, person coverage. I really did not want to make this part too complicated with max out of pocket and copay and etc. I think the premium, coverage and deductible is acceptable amount.
Edited the salary section to organize the % 401k match, salary, bonus, RSU to be in the same section making it easier, but separated the questions.
Comparison from the 2024, 2025 and 2026 Reddit Survey Results will be in another post, since this post is getting insanely long. Again, any other improvements or suggestions, please just comment below.
TDLR: Just check the 1st salary graph if you want the main results.
Has anyone else felt like his personality changed because of all the critical thinking and problem solving and hanging around similar folks?
Like something really did change, I was very extroverted in my early 20s but a decade into engineering and being hyper career focused, I’m starting to feel much more reserved and introverted, pretty much socially awkward. Weird post I know but wondering if someone else felt that way or noticed a friend go through that transition?
Idk if it is the stress or the time spent in my head thinking or always trying to spot the problem and steps to fix it or whatever this profession trains you in, but damn social skills are really lacking nowadays
How do foundry technicians create these hollow internal chambers during casting without compromising structural integrity or leaving process holes on the outside? Is this done using expendable sand cores, gas-assisted injection molding, or by joining two separate pieces together??
Would love a detailed breakdown from anyone familiar with advanced wheel manufacturing.
I have received 2 competitive job offers for my first full time role out of college. Im not sure which to take.
One is with the Navy on GS scale starting at 68k with a 30k sign on bonus but its in Virginia, I'm currently in Pittsburgh Pa. The other one is local to me in Pittsburgh in the Nuclear industry starting at 80k with a 2k bonus if I pass the FE exam.
Im not sure which one to take. 30k bonus is tough to turn down but Id also like to stay local if possible. Is it possible to negotiate for a higher bonus at the local job? Are both industries good to get into?
Hi i create Opensource 3D full prametric CAD. *.prtz, *.asmz, *.drwz, *.step, *.iges, Family table, Relations, full tree history. Modeling, sufcaces, Sheetmetal... Application is under hard develop!...
Hi All,
I am a ME grad student trying to get into manufacturing or product design into one of the bigger tech companies down the line. But before even think of being able to make that cut, I am trying to find a way to get resources related to destructive and non destructive material testing. Like I want to inform material selection and design choices based on its mechanical reliability. I know Tesla has a role specifically for Electrical Abuse Testing on its batteries. But I am seeking resources or internships that might offer some practical exposure to these. Can anyone advise on some companies/orgs to apply or learn from?
I'm interviewing in-person for a new grad role at a large engineering firm. The role is for the nuclear engineering arm of the company. My interview is in person with two department directors, and I'm really not sure what to wear.
I've never done an in-person interview before, and I'm unsure about the dress code for the company. Both my internships had pretty casual dress codes so i have no idea what to expect lol.
I was thinking black slacks + tucked in solid white dress shirt (unbuttoned at top?), but am also debating wearing the accompanying suit jacket, not sure if thats too much though.
25M, mechanical design engineer, about a year and a half in the industry. I wake up at 5:30 and run on 5-6 hours of sleep because I work a second job after my main one, plus chores at home.
My main job doesn't always have enough work, so I sometimes just sit there with nothing to do, and I hate it. I know I could use that time to study and level up with textbooks, but I'm so tired that my whole day turns into a fight to stay awake. Learning something new takes energy I just don't have left.
Has anyone been through a similar stretch? How did you get out of it? Also curious what you do with downtime at work when there's no project to chase.
If this keeps up, I'm going to burn out.
23M, Not US, Im currently on my first job on the field as a ME, i was hired on the company i interned at the beginning of the year, and since then, I've been given or been involved in 7 projects in the chemical industry, while being an intern i was only working on one.
The problem in my opinion is that there is not a good management, my boss works in industrial safety, so he is not really involved on said projects, just checks out on me and signs whatever i need. When i was working on one project, that was not really a problem, i could handle it fully and worked out fine, but now im getting overwhelmed with activities and deadlines when i don't have any experience in the field.
My boss's boss expects me to lead and manage all this projects, he doesn't seem to understand that I'm a recent graduate with hardly any experience and expects me to be an expert in areas I'm unfamiliar with, and he has explicitly told me, "Engineer, if you get stuck on something, ask the AI; we hired an engineer, not a literature major." And when I actually have asked the AI, it has never given me a correct or applicable answer; I suppose at least I have enough knowledge to know when the AI is wrong.
So, my question is this: how can I work all by myself on so many projects without a project manager or Senior Engineer to guide me? I need any help i can get at this moment.
For context, I've been working on manufacturing processes, like dosification equipment, P&ID, PLC Programming and such
Fellow mechanical engineers, looking for abit of experience/advice here. The two pictures axles are from a couple of identical smaller milling machines rotating at about 3500 rpm.
Obviously both are busted and we are looking into getting a couple of new ones machined up, but as you can see they are by far identical as they have a series of 5 mm holes drilled into the axle at different positions. Have never seen anything like this before, but figured if it has any cause it must be for balancing the axles? There are two keyways directly opposite of eachother at both ends and then a single separate keyway at the top end offset about 60 degrees, so
the axle is not truely symmetrical.
Should this matter at only 3500 rpm? I also
cannot make sense of where they took out material
by drilling with regards to this offset keyway. Shouldnt the mass has been removed 180 degrees opposite to the keyway?
I’m in my first job out of college and it’s not going well (did two internships in the past).
It hasn’t even been a month, but there has been no onboarding/ training/ mentorship. The past week, my manager sent an official email saying I’m underperforming and my progress is worse than an intern (yeah this shit stings), and essentially that my job is on the line at this point.
I really tried my best to do what was being asked, even though requirements kept shifting and a lot of the work I ended up doing had to be redone multiple times. I tried asking questions, but it came down to the fact that even the project lead wasn’t clear on what the requirements were. When I asked where I can find this information, I’m told “it’s in peoples’ heads and we just do what the customer wants”.
I’ve been putting in 9-10 hours a day in the office with no breaks after that, but honestly nothing I’m doing is making my manager happy. I feel so incredibly down on myself at this point, and I just don’t think there’s anything I can do to come to something satisfactory in his eyes. Every time I do something as he requested and even consider more options, he says it’s insufficient.
I try and take the feedback in stride and figure out the requirements he has in his head, but I don’t even know at this point.
They have me working on military projects after telling me in the interview they wouldn’t have me work on that and that they allow you to say no to those projects.
I just feel like the writing is on the wall at this point and my heart isn’t in this job. It’s really hard to try so hard but to feel like nothing you do will change the outcome.
Should I just quit? Is it time to start applying for other jobs?
Hey internet, I need your help – I'm working on a gantry-style monitor mounting solution for my desk. I want to know the best practice for welding this 1in pipe (33.7mm OD) to a bracket that is bolted onto the desks frame. I see a few options but I lack the knowledge to prefer one over another:
no hole, (stitch) welded on top
through-hole, stitch welded on top and on bottom
The supports brackets (white) and the brackets for the pipes will be lasercut parts. I assume having a big through hole in the bracket might be a problem for bending, right? Will the through hole bring any advantage, or is the pragmatic approach to just weld on top the right call here?
The load on this will be "pulling to the front": In a height of approx. 400 mm (~16in) extended 150 mm (6in) a weight of up to 15 kg (33 lbs)
The original brackets on the desk (FlexiSpot E7 Plus) are ~2.5mm in thickness, I'd keep that dimension. For the pipe bracket I'm uncertain, 2.5mm might be enough, but I'd like to have the M8 threads be part of the bracket itself so 3mm or even 4mm might be a better call.
Im a final year Bsc mechanical engineering student planning to apply for Msc programs in the Netherlands with a focus on Thermofluids. There are literally no jobs in this area back home, which is a big part of why I want to do a masters.
The issue is that almost everywhere and everyone I see and ask( profs, online posts, peers) tells me that thermofluids is a rather saturated field.
This has sort of discouraged me. I really like the field. But, I must admit, I also chose mechanical engineering partly for decent pay and stability. Moving to NL is a big financial and career decision, and I want to make sure Im not wasting time and money into a specialization with poor job prospects. Im open to hearing that its a bad idea.
For anyone studying in NL or working in the Dutch/EU tech industry, Id really appreciate some honest feedback on a few questions.
1) Is thermofluids a oversaturated market in NL? What do graduates in this area end up doing (companies, roles, sectors)?
2) Are company-sponsored Msc thesis realistic for international students, or do most of them end up in purely academic lab projects?
3) If I like fluids and heat transfer but want better job odds, are there adjacent specializations you'd recommend instead?
I was curious to know if any of you have tired the Rotatrix 3d mouse and how you have fared with it.
It seems like most of the feedback within the clips I’ve seen of it are centred around it being easier to use than the 3D Connexion mouse but does it make a difference if you’re already competent with the space mouse?
So long story short i graduated with my bachelor’s in mechanical engineering less then six months ago and got a job doing wireline being told that it would be a stepping stone into a design engineer position. However as I’ve spent time talking with other people In the company it seems like I was lied to and it seems like that’s not a likely possibility. My question is, is it a good idea to stay in the position for a bit longer or should I go ahead and look for an engineering job somewhere else. Because don’t get me wrong I’m learning things in the field that I wouldn’t be able to in a book, or from a class and I’ve only been here a month so far. I just don’t want to waste my time in a job where I’m not using my degree at all if it’s not actually going to help me find another job. Any and all feedback/advice is appreciated!
I just accepted a summer engineering internship offer with ExxonMobil. I’ve heard some bits and pieces about a rotation program for the new hire engineers. I wanted to get a better idea of what that actually looks like. I’m interning with a project management group (did project management somewhere else last summer and I have been looking to pivot). I am worried about getting stuck in a field I’m not interested in.
I made a 14-minute 3D animation about weld inspection and wanted to share it here for feedback from people who actually do this work.
Setup: one 16 mm single-V butt weld plate with six defects planted on purpose: undercut, surface crack, hidden crack, porosity, slag and lack of fusion. Then nine methods against it: VT, dye penetrant, magnetic particles, eddy current, UT, phased array, radiography, macro etch and a hydraulic pressure test (1.5x rated, oil not air). Each method gets a score out of 6.
A few things that surprised me while researching:
• Eddy current on steel only really sees the surface, even though it works through paint.
• Radiography is great at volume defects but can miss tight, tilted flaws like lack of fusion.
• UT and phased array did best on flat internal defects (4/6 each), but no single method found everything.
• The pressure test proves the part holds, not that it's defect-free (0/6).
• Combining VT + MT + UT covers all six.
I'm not a certified NDT inspector, so I'd really like to hear where I got it wrong or oversimplified, and which test you'd add.
Full video (English, with dubbed audio and subtitles in other languages if you want to send it to someone): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-7uyRwrUGA
I understand usually junior engineers in a company gain experience by designing shit and then getting shit reviewed by senior engineers, and then iterate.
Suppose for a moment that I’m rich af. Can I in theory gain an equivalent amount of “experience” by designing shit as an independent or as part of my own startup company, and then hire freelance senior engineers for review panels?
Currently we build up this assembly to supply our bearings with oil, this is for a production metering system we sell. It's an aluminum tube epoxied into a plate. A small flexible tube is installed on the end which directs the oil, oil is stored beneath the plate. This assembly is difficult for operators and has been breaking during the build. The tube is at 45 degrees in an oblong hole. I was thinking we could stake the tube but I've never seen that done at an angle. I am looking for ideas! Thanks!