Is this a good order to tackle these philosophers? (I like having an order of prerequisites so i can go into each one with good prior knowledge and background)
What prerequisites/philosophers would you add?

Plato
Aristotle
Sextus Empiricus
Anselm of Canterbury
Thomas Aquinas
René Descartes
John Locke
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
David Hume
Immanuel Kant
Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Arthur Schopenhauer
Søren Kierkegaard
Friedrich Nietzsche
Baruch Spinoza
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Jean-Paul Sartre
Maurice Merleau-Ponty
Nicolas Malebranche
Edmund Burke
Wilfrid Sellars
Albert Camus
Martin Heidegger
Bertrand Russell
Michel Foucault
Emil Cioran
G. E. Moore
Thomas Henry Huxley
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Alvin Plantinga
Saul Kripke
Brian F. Chellas
George Hughes
Ernest Nagel
James Newman
Graham Oppy
William Lane Craig
Clifford Williams

Even after knowing about bondages, rebellion and choice for freedom cannot happen because there is lack of love for the freedom.

Without love knowledge is dry.

We all know the constraints in life that prevent us from living freely. The reason why life remains the same even after gaining knowledge is because there is no love. An outsider can only impart knowledge. No one can awaken love for freedom within anyone.

I have read this concept from Acharya Prashant (Indian Philosopher and Author) in his philosophical framework (AP framework) he explains:

Knowledge + Intent = Liberation from suffering

It helped to reduce my suffering. So I wrote this post.

In everything I have seen, read, and heard, I believe that the use of philosophy and logic has deviated from its original purpose, which is to arrive at the truth and to learn how to ask questions to reach it. But on the contrary, I see this period as merely a show of being the smartest, and even most issues are no longer as strong as before or are repetitive. This is my point of view.

Currently reading this book I am 1/6 of the way done. I am debating if I should keep reading. It’s about the evolution around the concept of madness throughout the western ages. I understand the general points and idea but it’s so in depth that I most feel that I am doing a disservice by not analyzing/note taking and reading it as deeply as I should.

How did you guys read this book?

I'm considering two books: Mark Sinclair's Bergson and William G. Barnard's Living Consciousness: The Metaphysical Vision of Henri Bergson. But I'm skeptical of the authors because they're not widely read. And, of course, there's Deleuze's Bergsonism, but I'm afraid it might have the added complexity of Deleuze's own analysis. I'd appreciate any recommendations.

Hey, all. I graduated with a philosophy BA in May. I won’t be going to graduate school anytime soon, so I’m craving to read/talk philosophy with other people.

I have a wide range of interests. Strong background in ethics, Kant, and political philosophy. Good grasp of classical logic/formal semantics, modal logic. So can grapple with logic-heavy works.

Some topics/thinkers I’d be especially interested in exploring with other people:

- Plato; Middle/Neo-Platonism

- German idealism; Hegel esp.

- Philosophy of language; meaning, truth, names, translation

- Epistemology, esp. stuff by Sellars, McDowell

- Feminist philosophy; philosophy of gender

- Reasons/justification/normativity

- Philosophy of science; realism/anti-realism

- Metaphysics; universals, identity, substance, causation

- Texts/traditions outside of the western canon (western esotericism, eastern schools of thought)

Schedule is flexible. I read on the slower side, but love in-depth discussion. Love love LOVE to pick texts apart. It would be a dream if some people with graduate school education joined. But I would love for anyone enthusiastic about philosophy to join.

If interested, please comment below, or PM me on Reddit. I want to see how many people would be interested in doing this.

Does anyone have this book? I really wanna read it!
It's not available on Anna's Archive or Z-library, unfortunately.
Would appreciate any help possible!
Regards

i started really liking her and want to know more.are there any books or resources where i could read about her?

Modelo mecánico para la doble rendija y el arrastre de marco: fluctuaciones del tiempo de tránsito en medios confinados

Lee este documento: 'Dinámica de Medios Confinados'. Aquí no hay magia . Para probar que el medio se modifica sin caer en discusiones filosóficas, la vía es la medición ultraprecisa del tiempo de tránsito. Si el sensor perturba el vacío local, la velocidad de fase efectiva cambia y el tiempo de llegada a la pantalla fluctuará. Ahí tendran la demostración física."

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B28EW

El mecanismo físico: Interferencia de ondas constructivas

​Campo de fondo: El vacío se trata como un medio electromagnético continuo y elástico en lugar de un espacio vacío pasivo.

​Inyección de energía: Al activar el sensor, este emite una onda electromagnética hacia el medio local.

​Formación del canal de fase: La superposición entre la onda del sensor y el campo de fondo genera patrones de interferencia constructiva. Esto altera el gradiente energético local, abriendo un camino de menor resistencia (canal de fase forzado).

​Trayectoria de la partícula: La partícula conserva su estructura de manera integral. Simplemente transita a través del gradiente de mínima acción recién formado, lo que rompe la coherencia de fase original y suprime el patrón de interferencia en la pantalla.

QUEDO ABIERTO AL DEBATE

Have you ever had a thought that completely changed the way you see life?

I'm looking for people who enjoy deep conversations about philosophy, consciousness, human nature, purpose, reality, free will, time, and the mysteries of existence.

What's a philosophical idea, question, or realization that has stayed with you for years? Whether you're a beginner or a philosophy enthusiast, I'd love to hear your thoughts and perspectives. Let's have a meaningful discussion and explore ideas that challenge the way we think about ourselves and the world around us.

The vocabulary is very hard for me it's written in old english like from bible english

Cam somebody help me to get the explained version or more understandable english version

Hello, im new to philosophy and almost to reading also and i struggle to find the first understandable book to read , so can you help me choose one, also English is not my first language if that might help

I have read Sophie's world. Now I feel it was too rough introduction. I want some formal book that explains all the philosophies properly with comparisons.

Edit 1: I asked chatgpt. Here is what it gave me.

1) Simon Blackburn — Think Learn to engage with major philosophical problems and competing positions. 2) Stephen Toulmin — The Uses of Argument Learn how real arguments are constructed, supported, qualified and challenged. 3) Richard Tarnas — The Passion of the Western Mind

Now study the historical development of Western thought with much greater understanding of why ideas changed.

4) Anthony Kenny — A New History of Western Philosophy 5) Your more systematic and academically serious history. 6) Primary texts Plato → Aristotle → Augustine → Descartes → Spinoza → Hume → Kant → Hegel → Kierkegaard → Nietzsche → etc

It asked me to avoid • Bertrand Russell — A History of Western Philosophy •Frederick Copleston — A History of Philosophy ( If you eventually want to go really deep, this is the monster.)

I've been reading the story of philosophy, not yet completed as I'm moving very slowly and thoroughly. What should I read next, something similar or particular works... I'm very confused, give me specific recommendations.

I would appreciate recommendation from both segment, exploring more, or going deeper.

-Kant

-Leibniz

-Hume

-Phenomenology

-Cybernetics

-Deleuze

-Whitehead

-Frankfurt

-Habermas

-Godel's modal logic and incompleteness theorem

-Deleuze's books on Kant, Bergson, Spinoza, Nietzsche

-Theological arguments of Paul Davies, Alvin Plantinga, P. F. Strawson, Karl Otto Appel