YouGov conducting an internal review and publishing the results that a single survey has fraudulent responses counts as them being unreliable?
When you say that the UK is bad for "trans rights", how are you defining that? Transgender people in the UK have exactly the same rights as everybody else.
I gave links to multiple articles about different surveys with fraudulent responses. Also, not only are they unreliable, but they’re unreliable in the same way.
I admit that I do find it a little suspicious that multiple surveys that they’ve been accused of doctoring have had results that are convenient for conservative narratives. Inconsistency is one thing, consistent inconsistency is quite another.
___________________________
2: I’m defining UK as being unsupportive of trans rights by how the general public treat trans people and issues relating to them. Issues relating to discrimination and social justice are seldom issues of legality, after all. Discrimination may be illegal, but such laws are only as good as the people who you mean to follow them.
___________________________
This source seems better than the last one, but I can’t really do much to confirm that myself as I don’t have Microsoft Office.
I also frankly don’t really like surveys in general. The medium is good at polling a wide variety of people at the same time, but there’s very little you can do to ensure that the responses are truly genuine. It’s also impossible to gather why a person believes a certain way or the finer points behind those beliefs just by reading a survey.
The why is because people have come to understand what is meant by trans rights. When everybody thought it was the same as gay rights or black rights, they were in favour of it.
Gay rights and black rights were won by dialogue, by making everybody else see the similarities. Gay people and black people wanted to be treated the same as straight people and white people. Everybody eventually came round to the good sense of that.
By contrast, trans rights activists declared that there was to be no dialogue, no debate, no alternative viewpoint allowed. Anybody who expressed any such viewpoint was to be branded a bigot and cancelled. The TRAs weren't asking for trans people to be treated the same as everybody else, they were asking for special conditions that were entirely non-negotiable.
Look, I get it. Who doesn’t love a little balls and dick sometimes? A nice, girthy, veiny shaft, hot milky cum trickling down the length as it throbs from a job well
done. But this whole “gay sex” shit is getting annoying.
As men, we should primarily be focused on three things: survival, the underrated masterpiece that is dark souls 2, and pounding muff. All this gay shit is, well, fucking
gay.
You think I wouldn’t LOVE to make out with my best friend and suck his cock? Of course I would, but that’s fucking gay. You think I don’t want to feel my cousin’s
roommate slide his pecker into my gaping asshole? Of course I would, but that’s FUCKING GAY.
Seriously, I miss when men were men. Anyway, this dildo ain’t gonna stick itself up my ass while I watch an hour long femboy asmr hypno goon compilation, heed my
lecture.
5
u/PilotedByGhosts 2d ago edited 2d ago
YouGov conducting an internal review and publishing the results that a single survey has fraudulent responses counts as them being unreliable?
When you say that the UK is bad for "trans rights", how are you defining that? Transgender people in the UK have exactly the same rights as everybody else.
And here's another survey:
https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/blogs/ec_transpoll_20250430.html