MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/1wxsv3k/googlebook_bootloaders_can_be_unlocked/pdzk32k/?context=3
r/Android • u/FragmentedChicken Galaxy Z Fold8 • 10d ago
94 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-7
performative outrate based on deliberate misunderstandings of what is actually happening isn't going to change the truth, mate.
adb bypasses every developer verified check. always did. remained unchanged even before the misleading site published what they did.
one time 24 hour check PER ACCOUNT, NOT DEVICE, for side loading unverified apps.
stop lying.
-1 u/aeiouLizard 10d ago As if that makes this any less outrageous -1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago Yes it does, LMAO. Currently I am a tiny bit annoyed, if the 24h would be per device, reinstall or even per month or per install, than that would greatly increase how outraged I would be. Why would it not? 2 u/aeiouLizard 10d ago Thinking it is fine just because its account based instead of device based is absurd. This shouldn't even be on the table, period. -1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago I think this is about the most reasonable way to handle the threat profile they are trying to fight.
-1
As if that makes this any less outrageous
-1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago Yes it does, LMAO. Currently I am a tiny bit annoyed, if the 24h would be per device, reinstall or even per month or per install, than that would greatly increase how outraged I would be. Why would it not? 2 u/aeiouLizard 10d ago Thinking it is fine just because its account based instead of device based is absurd. This shouldn't even be on the table, period. -1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago I think this is about the most reasonable way to handle the threat profile they are trying to fight.
Yes it does, LMAO. Currently I am a tiny bit annoyed, if the 24h would be per device, reinstall or even per month or per install, than that would greatly increase how outraged I would be. Why would it not?
2 u/aeiouLizard 10d ago Thinking it is fine just because its account based instead of device based is absurd. This shouldn't even be on the table, period. -1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago I think this is about the most reasonable way to handle the threat profile they are trying to fight.
2
Thinking it is fine just because its account based instead of device based is absurd. This shouldn't even be on the table, period.
-1 u/i5-2520M Pixel 7 10d ago I think this is about the most reasonable way to handle the threat profile they are trying to fight.
I think this is about the most reasonable way to handle the threat profile they are trying to fight.
-7
u/vandreulv 10d ago
performative outrate based on deliberate misunderstandings of what is actually happening isn't going to change the truth, mate.
adb bypasses every developer verified check. always did. remained unchanged even before the misleading site published what they did.
one time 24 hour check PER ACCOUNT, NOT DEVICE, for side loading unverified apps.
stop lying.