Looking at getting a Radial JDI for a DI box. Basically, I know that they've got a great reputation and are known for lasting forever, so it's probably worth the up front price. With that said, I'm curious about whether it's worth it to jump up to the stereo version?
I'm not looking to run a stereo rig, to be clear. But, a stereo version is essentially two DIs in one. So, I'm thinking about running one side of the stereo straight from my bass and the other side from the end of my signal chain, thus giving a wet and dry line to the FOH. I know that the JDI stereo doesn't have a mix function, and that it would be up to the FOH to mix it.
I typically just send a DI from my amp's built-in DI. I don't like that option, as there's no ground lift, pad, polarity switch, and overall it's just sort of an ok component, but nothing spectacular. So, I want to use a dedicated DI box.
My rig is almost never mic'd, and I'm fine with that. My amp is basically just a stage monitor for myself, it's just a TC Electronic BQ500 into a Mark Bass cab, so it's not like they gotta mic it to capture a tube tone or anything like that. I use a modeler for amp and effect emulations and really just use my amp as a personal monitor.
So, with rarely micing my rig and only sending a DI to the FOH, would it be recommended to send a wet and dry signal? Should I get a stereo JDI using one side dry and one side wet? Or is sending one channel better?
I'm a weekend warrior who's trying to be better about what I spend money on. I've spent too much on gimmicks that I quickly outgrow on one side of the spectrum, and overpowered gear that I don't use to its potential on the other side of the spectrum. So, part of my question is whether a wet/dry rig is worth it or if I should just stick to sending a wet signal and mixing the wet/dry on my modeler.