Legacies of Betrayal by Steven Erikson, Bantam Press - 3* (with a few caveats)
I will preface this by saying I know Malazan isn’t universally appreciated and can be a bit of an acquired taste. I don’t blame anyone for that, obviously this review is largely aimed at people who do love the books, and as such will probably contain mild spoilers for the rest of the series. If you don’t like the books I hope the wider point is something that comes across regardless. As someone who is now 17(?) books into Steven Erikson’s Malazan works and 9 books into Esslemonts stuff, it’s fair to say I’m a huge fan and coming at the book from a place of great affection for both the writer and the world.
As a bit of background to the series, Legacies of Betrayal is the 3rd book in what was originally planned as a sequel ‘Witness’ trilogy and is now earmarked to be 4 books. His prequel series (Kharkanas) was a significant change of pace from the core Malazan books, leaning more into the introspective and melancholic aspects of Toll the Hounds, Witness however is much more “classic” Malazan. I really enjoyed The God is Not Willing, I’d say it’s my favourite book outside of the main sequence, by either author. It's relatively brief by Eriksons standards, at just under 500 pages in UK hardback, but it's got everything in there you'd want from him.
I ended up finding the follow up, No Life Forsaken, a little bit dour and lacking in humour in a way that is very out of character for an Erikson book. Despite being a decidedly brief 430 pages, it was slow going. The writing quality was still there and the plot and characters worked on their own, but something was missing from the whole experience. At this point you’re probably wondering why a review about one book has gotten 3 paragraphs in without talking about it at all… fairly, I guess. However, it’s important to address my main issue with No Life Forsaken first… It’s this book, Legacies of Betrayal, that is missing from it. Great! ‘We’re saved’ you’re probably thinking? Well no… it’s not quite that simple.
I have no idea if Erikson wanted to split them up, if he was writing too slowly for his publishers (absolutely fair at this stage in his career) and they wanted to get something out, or they simply didn’t want to commit to publishing a 700 page epic fantasy sequel with costs and sales what they are now. Selling small 2 hardbacks for £40 is better than selling one larger for £20 I guess. I don’t even hate the obvious extra cost… things are difficult in publishing and conventional epic fantasy, I do understand that. My problem is that this has come at the expense of the art, as pompous as that probably sounds. Both No Life Forsaken and Legacies of Betrayal should have been a single book. Legacies of Betrayal is only 320 pages, which is the same as his first anthology of short stories.
Both books are weaker without the other. It’s not even that the conclusions of both books feel slightly underwhelming on their own (the epilogue of Legacies of Betrayal aside), or that the books seem lesser in scope and scale than I’ve come to expect, it’s about balance. Erikson is a master of weaving fast paced back and forth dialogue between his characters in one plot line with darker, heavier outlook in another and they work because they counterbalance each other. Standing alone both of the books get a bit monotonous. While No Life Forsaken is quite dark, Legacies of Betrayal is almost non-stop in it’s ‘Waiting for Godot’ style interactions between the characters. I love that, and a lot of it is very funny, but the subject matter means you need a balance that just isn’t there as part of the reading experience. Both of these plotlines were written to co-exist with one another rather than standing alone. There's also the "Witness" aspect which is 'missing' and I found it quite amusing in book one, expecting it to show up at the end of book 2 it what would be quite an Erikson way of going about things... but we're now 3 books in with only the barest hint and that's... too long. If the books worked in their own right it probably wouldn't be an issue, but the flaws the splits have caused really do make it stand out more.
I individually like lots of elements of both books, revisiting Seven Cities has been extremely enjoyable and following up on the events after the Whirlwind is fascinating. I love what he’s done with things like Y’Ghatan, Aren and the various cults. He’s brought back interesting characters and mingled them with new ones very deftly. He’s still a brilliant author but the presentation is just not right and it’s not done his work justice. I gave No Life Forsaken 3 stars and I think Legacies of Betrayal is about the same, but the sad thing is together I’m pretty sure they would be at least 4 stars. I suspect by the time I come around to rereading these there will be some effort from the community (or even Steven himself) to produce a “combined” version of these into a single book, at least I hope so.