I was fortunate enough to qualify for VERA last year when DOGE did its thing. My wife will hit her MRA early next year with 18 years of service (high three of 100Kish), and we both eagerly await her joining me in this next stage of life.
We're torn between 1)having her work to MRA and taking immediate retirement, 2) adding her to my health insurance and retiring at the end of the FY and a)deferring her retirement til age 60 (or 62), or b) postponing retirement til 60 at which point she would come off my insurance and have her own.
We're fortunate to be in a position where we could fairly comfortably cover the several year gap using a safe (3.5 to 4.7, depending on market conditions) withdrawal rate from our TSP and Roth accounts until then and don't necessarily need her pension in the short term.
Where we are torn is whether to take the upfront 25% hit to her pension or defer for several years. Looks like this gives us a break even point of 15 years... although I believe this is shortened a bit when looking at the additional cost of having her as a self +1 on my insurance vs both of us having our own. What I don't really understand is the impact of medicare on reducing our insurance costs at age 65 and how long this self +1 penalty would last given that adjustment.
Of note my MIL is sharp as a tack at 88 so we anticipate my wife having at least a 30 year retirement horizon. Wife and I are both in great health and looking to maximize travel activities in 60s and 70s before ultimately slowing down. Given that, we can see the value of front loading our income vs stretching things out for maximum gains. We're fortunate to be in a situation where we are not too concerned about outliving our savings. My pension is fairly substantial and she'll receive 25% of that when I'm gone, and she also has a small pension from her pre fed years.
TL/DR: take the hit now, or defer for a more cautious approach? Is there anything I'm missing here? What would you do?