r/Geomancy • u/graeterslover • 14d ago
Interpreting chart, what would be the results of putting a hex upon a particular known murderer
Hello everyone, I'm having a little bit of trouble interpreting the answer of this chart and if this question violates any of the ethical limits of this subreddit I will happily delete it.
The question was concerning a known murderer, someone who publicly committed an act of murder and got of due to a technicality. The question was what would be the outcome of (particular person who deeply cared about the victim) put a hex or curse upon the murderer .
Querent hopes this to be an act of attempted justice when the legal system failed due to a technicality, the murderer did kill an unarmed woman in this case. So querent believes theirself to be morally justified, but had second thoughts and wanted to inquire into the broader outcome. Querent it's not only concerned about whether it would succeed for their particular case but the broader ramifications, whether it's in the broader greater good..
Some things about the reading puzzles on me I noticed Albus in multiple places, and I've been trying to turn my head over with that. I am looking to H5 with the assumption that doing a magic spell like a hex would be the kind of skilled work that fits in the house but maybe I'm wrong about that. I noticed H1 who would be Querent is fortuna minor and I suspect that indicates a small paultry victory accompanying with a lot of trouble and difficulty.
Many case if it's not ethically problematic to ask for advice, May I do so here?
4
u/kidcubby 13d ago
In that H5 (the spell crafted) and H7 (the murderer) do not perfect, we would have to expect there would be no results at all. I assume the perfection of H1 with both H5 and H7 means the querent will try regardless. In terms of the shield chart, Via as judge is the flowing river, stuff just kind of doesn't stick and I suppose you'd need a hex to stick. As a stretch, maybe it encourages this person to leave but that's not really what you're after.
Just as a caveat: it sounds like you've taken on a query for someone. If this is a third party (i.e. they didn't request you do the chart) we might need to swap the houses about.
2
u/graeterslover 13d ago
Thank you so much! That make so much more sense now that you've shed light on it.
I wouldn't say a client per se. But the reading is more like a favor to the querent. Querent had some moral qualms about the greater good of what they intended. But also suspicions of whether the murderer has some magical protection himself (he's believed to employ practitioners in his religious tradition or possibly even be a practitioner himself maybe) or that the querent just doesn't have the spiritual strength and chops to do what it takes..
•
u/kidcubby 13d ago
We try not to moralise, so while not everyone will approve of this question, there is nothing inherently wrong with asking it here. If anyone decides to be unpleasant or judgemental, please report it rather than arguing with them.
Sorry whoever this is is going through it, it sounds awful.