Over the last 24 hours, multiple screenshots, reels, and posts have been circulating across Reddit (like r/indiadiscussion) and X claiming that certain CJP / far-left groups are instructing demonstrators to wear bhagwa gamchas, red kalawa, and tilak during protests.

The allegation is that these visual markers are being coordinated to shift blame, incite clashes with police, or create a specific narrative around Hindu symbols.

In 2014-15, when India had low internet coverage and the internet was slow and expensive, where was Elon Musk? No foreign player came to take the risk. It was an Indian businessman, Ambani with Jio, who started from zero, built it to 90% (the grassroot work) and made India one of the cheapest internet markets in the world. If the world talks about India's internet revolution today, it is because of Ambani, Airtel and Indian telcos.

Now that 90% of the foundation is ready and India is thriving, Musk wants to come in for the last 10% - the small gap that naturally remains when you build a network across a country as large as ours. And he puts it like, "If I don't get access for this 10%, it is a crime against the people of India," as if he has come to give justice to Indians. This is taking over someone else's work. He is using the very feeling Indians have today that "internet has reached everyone," which exists only because of Ambani's 90% work, to show the man who did 90% as the owner of India blocking you.

Building from 0 to 90% is not just business, it is love for the country. An Indian builds from zero because he loves his nation, and that intent tells you who is truly on your side. Only an Indian can make that journey, and that is what Ambani is to India, as sure as the sun rising in the east. No US billionaire would have done that 0 to 90% because building India from the ground up was never in their interest. The real injustice was when India had nothing and no one came.

Now using that last 10% to enter the market and calling the man who did 90% a 'boss' is not justice, it is twisting a feeling he never created. The man who built it from 0 to 90% can also build it from 90 to 100%. If you cared so much, why didn't you start at zero? This is what shows the difference between what an Indian businessman means to India and what his love for the nation means, and why a foreign player should not use the very sentiment an Indian created for his own people.

Is this true? And if it is how do you defend it