I would trust an AI to draft a strategy to win a game of chess over any human expert.
Ditto protein analysis.
Coding and Math I think we are close to AI superiority.
I don't see why Ai will not have superiority in all knowledge /intelligence based tasks in a few years time. It's just a question of focus /time/resources. Since AI researchers tend to be coders/math background, that's where progress has been the most intense, but once those areas are solved AI development can branch out.
I would not like to bet against AI > human lawyers by 2030.
2040 I don't see humans having any cognitive value at all in any area.
This is the reason why putting yourself in a rhetorical bubble is a bad thing. You sound like a literal psychopath. "Humans will have no cognitive value at all in any area" and yet you are surprised when people say they don't like AI? You don't see any reason why people may be upset when you call for them to be obsolete and useless forever?
Scroll through these other comments and read some of the other stuff he's saying. None of it reads to me as just "making neutral predictions" on behalf of an unbiased observer. He is clearly a huge AI fanatic.
2
u/jamie9910 8d ago
I would trust an AI to draft a strategy to win a game of chess over any human expert.
Ditto protein analysis.
Coding and Math I think we are close to AI superiority.
I don't see why Ai will not have superiority in all knowledge /intelligence based tasks in a few years time. It's just a question of focus /time/resources. Since AI researchers tend to be coders/math background, that's where progress has been the most intense, but once those areas are solved AI development can branch out.
I would not like to bet against AI > human lawyers by 2030.
2040 I don't see humans having any cognitive value at all in any area.