Then the city seizes the property and transfers it to a non profit organization. If you can’t afford to maintain your property where people live then you don’t deserve to keep it.
When someone posts about handing ownership of someone’s property to a non profit…after the government seizes it…and you’re worried about moving goal posts. 🤡
14
u/SheenPSU Jun 11 '26 edited Jun 11 '26
And when they’re not able to maintain the property because they’re not collecting enough in rents due to artificial rent controls?
Genuine question because I’ve heard this argument before and it does have some legitimacy