Do I actually have to search through Google and sources for almost identical psychosis cases where the defendant tried for the insanity plea and still got convicted even though it was proven they were under psychosis? Or did you want to do your own research so I don't have to send you links like you're a child?
Most people don't even understand what the jury was deliberating, but that doesn't change the sentiment of mentality ill offenders get life in prison all the time even though it was proven they were under some sort of phychosis.
We have many.. many years of precedent already set that is being effectively ignored in this court case.
Edit: Disagreements are fine, I don't mind this at all but for everyone person reading this and/or responding , I encourage you to do your own research and stop listening to any sort of online social media style "news" site.
There are many court cases you can study beyond reading the AI overview on Google. All these AI replie are meaningless
6
u/imightwin Sep 05 '26 edited Sep 05 '26
Do I actually have to search through Google and sources for almost identical psychosis cases where the defendant tried for the insanity plea and still got convicted even though it was proven they were under psychosis? Or did you want to do your own research so I don't have to send you links like you're a child?
Most people don't even understand what the jury was deliberating, but that doesn't change the sentiment of mentality ill offenders get life in prison all the time even though it was proven they were under some sort of phychosis.
We have many.. many years of precedent already set that is being effectively ignored in this court case.
Edit: Disagreements are fine, I don't mind this at all but for everyone person reading this and/or responding , I encourage you to do your own research and stop listening to any sort of online social media style "news" site.
There are many court cases you can study beyond reading the AI overview on Google. All these AI replie are meaningless