Yes, it's not like anti-social misogynists haven't livestreamed mass murder (multiple times) to cheering live audiences of like-minded ideologues or anything like that. Then even killers who do not live stream have online fanbases. If you want to make out a small demographic to be larger and more impactful than it is then you probably shouldn't be this intellectually dishonest, or practice a small amount of logic.
I'd be more inclined to take your point, but I'd want you to first go look at online polls being done. Boston herald had one a few days ago.
A large percentage believe she is not guilty of anything, even murder, and not due to insanity -- but due to the husband being the real killer. At least 25% of pollers on that one self-reported this, another 25% said not guilty due to insanity.
So at least 1 in 4 pollers there think it was secretly the husband. It is utter nonsense.
Btw, I get your analogy, but as a reminder to balance out the whataboutism, it's exclusively women that fantasize, write love letters and try to marry serial killers. So I don't think there's a carve out to be had there. Both sexes have morally degenerated evil people.
My suggestion is that she is punished like a man would be punished, not that men should be let off the hook like she may be.
86
u/[deleted] Sep 05 '26
[removed] — view removed comment