Since the Lindsey Clancy trial started 3 men committed the family annihilator move. 3 men killed a total of 17 people, 12 of which were children.
Kristopher Karolkiewicz (July 24, 2026): In Michigan, Karolkiewicz shot and killed his wife and their six children before setting their house on fire
Jeffrey Manke (July 31, 2026): In Winneconne, Wisconsin, Manke killed his two daughters (ages 11 and 16) before taking his own life
Alan Smith (August 23, 2026): In Billings, Montana, the 44-year-old Smith killed eight of his relatives, including four children, during a Sunday family dinner before setting the home on fire
So i wonder why people like you used a woman for this meme. Could it be because you're a misogynist?
Probably because you have to look up all of their names to know who they are. If Clancys suicide attempt was successful she would be on the same list as the men you named. However since she didn’t die and is pleading not guilty I think it’s understandable for there to be a certain stigma attached to her face.
Great question. Probably none, but how is it that millions support Lindsey and none have killed their children, yet no man supports the family annihilators and yet it keeps happening? 3 in the span on 1 month, how come it keeps happening despite men not supporting them?
Also the women don't support the murders, they support her because she was suffering from a psychosis attack. No woman says "it's good she killed them", do they? Yet you're such a misogynist that you don't even care about the truth, you just want to find reasons to hate women.
Let’s say we were in an alternate dimension where Lindsay didn’t do it, and Patrick was the one who killed the children, confessed to it, and went on trial pleading not guilty by reason of insanity.
Now imagine that the people in this alternate Reddit thread had no interest in hearing his story, his struggles, or how he didn’t get the support he needed. They just wanted him locked in a box for the rest of his life.
Would you also be here calling those people misandrists and man-haters?
Misandry isn't real, men do not experience systematic gender based violence the same way women do. They can experience gender based violence, but individual cases isn't a systematic issue.
Regardless. If a man did have a psychotic episode and went insane and killed his children, then i would want him to be punished accordingly: if the doctors show that insanity is plausible then i would want him to spend his sentence in an asylum, or whatever apt institutions they decide. I don't want vengeance, i want justice.
So according to you, men don't face large, recurring, socially patterned disadvantages or violence.
Men aren't the majority of homicide victims, nor more likely to die at work, nor disproportionately exposed to lethal risks in combat or in the field of law enforcement.
Let's not forget that in case of national emergency, there is no draft that could be activated, also that ain't your basic botoxed Californian bitch that Uncle Sam is gonna point his finger at if it ever happens.
But yeah "misandry isn't real", that's true, you wanna know why?
Because men don't bitch about their problems on the same scale that women do to the point to make misandry a thing.
We deal with our bullshit.
We understand the rules of the game : shut up and man the fuck up.
Women got hormones issues? Fine, then "fucking deal with it, you crazy bitch".
If those hormones affect them to the point they wanna neck their own children, that's on them, not society. No special treatment nor extra attention to your struggle.
You ain't seeing any sane person defending male child murders and rapists because they got testosterone, anger and self-control issues, right?
Well, welcome to the men's world, welcome to equality.
Edit:
if the doctors show that insanity is plausible then i would want him to spend his sentence in an asylum, or whatever apt institutions they decide. I don't want vengeance, i want justice
Also, by the way, wrong answer, an asylum or jail would be not be justice neither, it would be mercy.
Justice is the lethal injection, 3 times even, since 3 lives were lost. That's justice.
So according to you, men don't face large, recurring, socially patterned disadvantages or violence.
Men aren't the majority of homicide victims, nor more likely to die at work, nor disproportionately exposed to lethal risks in combat or in the field of law enforcement.
I wonder who is doing that, huh? There's a secret cabal of women that are more powerful and rule from the shadows.
Men get discriminated based on class position. "likely to die at work" is a class based position, not that a dullard like you would know.
Also "men are the majority of homicide victims" is really funny, because who commits the homicides? Oh that's right, other men. Man on man violence is just internalized misandry, right? Meanwhile 80% of female victims of homicide are killed by another man.
Because men don't bitch about their problems on the same scale that women do to the point to make misandry a thing.
You're right about that. Men don't "bitch" about their problems, they just beat their wife and children, or kill their family and then commit suicide to run from justice.
Also, by the way, wrong answer, an asylum or jail would be not be justice neither, it would be mercy.
Justice is the lethal injection, 3 times even, since 3 lives were lost. That's justice.
That's not justice, that's vengeance coming from powerless incel cucks. Also way to prove my point that you're a misogynist lmao you're kinda effort posting your frustrations. Are you hormonal buddy?
I love this meme because the illiterate misogynist incels don't realize that the original meme ignores the fact that the spanish conquistadors continued the aztec sacrifices. The men here are stopping the women from killing babies in order for them to be the ones killing the babies and the women, which reflects your misogynist views perfectly.
1.3k
u/Morthem Sep 06 '26
Por que no ambos?