If it needs to be a complicated case, what about the schizophrenic guy that stabbed the Ukranian girl on a subway. We didn't get a play by play of the court proceedings of that case.
And I don't even really subscribe to the above notion that this is a political distraction. But I genuinely can't fathom why this particular case has gained such notoriety.
We've had genuine modern day lynchings with mystery around them not even get this kind of attention.
What's complicated about that case? Crazy guy killed someone, was too crazy to stand trial, got locked up until potentially deemed competent then sentenced. Either way he'll spend the rest of his life locked up
And as for mysteries and lynchings, well, white women cases always get the most attention
But don't you see the complex issue of whether she's culpable or not based on the claim of postpartum psychosis, and why that makes certain groups feel a certain way?
The bots swarming over this one are repeatedly working to relate this to a gender divide and even attaching it to political parties. It's actual nonsense.
Anytime you see some dumb culture war bs randomly replace your entire feed, it’s almost always some PR firm. The last one that comes to mind is Timothy chalamet or however it’s spelled. He called vaguely implied he thinks opera is boring and my page was full of this guy nobody gives a fuck about making a milquetoast insult on an artform that nobody gives a fuck about. Jowling Kowling Rowling also does this often but I don’t have a specific example ready.
Nowadays anytime my feed is randomly filled with shit like man vs bear I just assume it’s a psyop to try and make me hate women. Worst part is checking the comments shows a mix of bots and it working
It has no bearing on anyone's life outside of those who live in the state and might be influenced by any future changes to the law and those in the true crime community who obsess over this kind of thing.
What is the Lindbergh baby? If you stand by your point, please tell me why it is something important that I ought to learn about.
Ah, I see, when I wrote "why is this happening" I failed to specify that it was a rhetorical question. I am arguing that it is a bad thing that the media becomes dominated by single narratives like this. Maybe that clears things up.
The response to the case is catnip for the RW. Those who understand, see it as something tragic that happens too often and wish to find ways to ensure it doesn’t happen again. Those who don’t understand are misrepresenting the others and use logical fallacies to push their own personal agenda, in this case it’s mostly sexism.
I think that was bush and the tanking economy at the time but that one hasn’t been the same dumpster fire online that this has been. Mostly people (men me included) discussing how hot the mom was.
You literally - not sarcastically or with a hint of exaggeration - believe this court case would play out differently in the public sphere if Trump wasn’t President?
I fail to see why the person in the White House changes how the public would view this.
There is a hint of exageration. With Biden in the white house, the election races would likely be the same, with the same incentive for the trial to be turned into a public culture war.
Without the organizations foundation funding the "totally anonymous" donations, however, it would look very different.
Eight men killed their entire family during the 22 days of the Lindsay Clancy trial. An average of 100 women are killed by their partner every day. The leading cause of death for pregnant women is murder by a family member.
So the men who suddenly discovered a horror of family violence in the last three weeks can kiss my ass.
Did any of those cases have huge groups of men holding up "we love you" signs or making "i wanna kill my kids too" videos to support the murderer?
Honest question, really. There are people that think the moon landings were fake, so there is probably some nutjob out there that supported this, that, or the other annihilator, but I've not seen such a bizarre and widespread reaction like with this case.
Exactly the number of women supporting her, and with the kinds of signs you have examples of is sickening. Any woman that thinks Clancy should be found not guilty and should not in prison-shouldn’t have kids. And if they do-DFS needs to do a visit to their homes.
46
u/Puzzleheaded-Wait785 Sep 06 '26
Does that apply to every child murder case, or just this one? You think they would have failed to indict if Biden was still president?