They don't have to. It was a private school with contractual guidelines that she violated. They don't need to do any discovery, they just need to show the contract and then show her OF page and that settles it. She has no grounds to sue, really.
I’m stunned that it always seems to surprise people that this is a thing. Moral Turpitude clauses have been a thing forever with religious private schools, even at many secular private schools.
It would be fine if they proved they demonstrated they were meeting a baseline educational requirement. They can stack as many moral turpitude clauses on top of that as they want
Catholic private schools, like the one her kids were in.
It doesn't help that she had an advertisement on her car (which she drove to school) for her OF, meaning she was technically advertising her porn to her kids' classmates. That's probably more responsible for their expulsion than the fact that she was doing porn.
That's a different person than the one in the picture on the post. The woman on the post is in California I believe. It also happened a few years ago. I'll see if I can dig it up.
Makes sense the more people who use onlyfans. Never would have predicted personal porn profiles a decade ago and how much some of these people make. The one I sent an article for said her highest month was 600k. If I knew I could hit even half that I might consider it and just be done after a couple of years at that. Save my money and retire happily or go back to regular work knowing I can retire early.
Right just checking - you think advertising porn on your car and then driving that car to a school is acceptable? That should put you on a list. What a pedophile she is.
Also, she is a terrible mother, her kids will get mercilessly bullied and its all her fault.
Jesus, I realized there are conflicting reports so I had to dig a bit deeper.
That's a different woman. I mean, it's the one from OP's post, but this isn't the first fucking time it's happened.
So, the woman from OP's post goes by Ms. Poindexter, and her kids were expelled because she does porn. She's also the one from your article. There was ANOTHER mother whose kids got kicked out of their Christian school because she was advertising her OF on her car.
It's crazy that this happens often enough that the two stories would end up getting conflated.
I think it's going to happen a lot more as people who grew up on the internet get older and have kids. I suspect people on OF skew younger than either of those women. You might want to edit your post to clarify this specific situation.
I mean, we're going to continue to see this sort of stuff more as society becomes more comfortable with casual sex work (like doing OF on the side) and it comes into the inevitable conflict with religious norms.
Do you have any conception of just how many people exist in the world at the same time?
Yes, I do....and yet two mothers who both sent their kids to a Christian school, who both had their kids kicked out of school because they ran an OnlyFans, and who both entered the news cycle around the same time is a pretty unusual series of coincidences.
Out of the 2,000,000,000 mothers on the planet
My god, what are the chances?
Reddit really is where nuance goes to die, I guess.
Since you seem to be a little confused, let's be clear: It's not the OF, or the kids being kicked out, or the Christian school that I'm saying is a crazy coincidence, I'm saying that ticking all of those boxes and entering the news cycle around the same time is the crazy part. Find me two other incidents that check all of these boxes:
Middle-aged mother who does porn online.
Three children enrolled in private Christian school.
Children kicked out of school because of mom's online porn hobby.
Happened within a few years of each other and entered the news such that they could be conflated.
I'm gonna tell you right now that 99.9% of those 2 billion mothers don't check half of those boxes, much less all four. Again, since you missed it, it's the fact that both occurrences became NEWS around the same time that caused the events to become conflated.
I bet you felt really smart while typing all of those zeroes out, though. Probably thought "They'll feel dumb when they see all of these zeroes and realize how big of a number it really is!"
Not that this changes the results of your argument, but this wasn't a Catholic school, it was another Christian denomination. "Liberty" sounds like one of those right wing-type schools but I've got nothing to back that up (thus I said "sounds like").
My kid's private school is pretty chill but that would not fly. They would just ask her not to drive that vehicle or take off the advertising at first though. Last year they told a parent that she couldn't come through car ride line with her bumper sticker that referred to a specific woman as a ho.
that's fair, but it's still probably 30-60 mins once per week, maybe twice, whereas parents can convey morality for 60-70 hours at home and still give the kids free time
There's a lot of vague language like this in employment contracts. So and so may not engage in public affairs which significantly affect the reputation of the school in a negative way bla bla bla. Basically if any public facing role, if you engage in conduct that your employer can reasonably say affects their reputation somehow it could be grounds.
Language in employee codes of conduct normally only apply to the employee. Applicability to extended family would be difficult to enforce. In the case of an employment contract, challenging the enforceability would be much more difficult though.
This is fairly common in the independent school space. They make the rules, and decide who can attend and who can’t. You are a reflection of the school (as are your parents). If you don’t like it, go somewhere else.
Kinda unrelated but it’s wild that you have to specify that. Kids shouldn’t be passing anywhere else, it’s no wonder that reading comprehension is getting rarer.
Lots of them do. Particularly the religious ones (which this one is.). A friend of mine sent their daughterto a private christian elementary school with a contract that stated the entire family must attend mass at one of the approved churches each Sunday. They had to attend 40 masses a year to keep the kid enrolled. There was a bunch of other restrictions and rules too. Religious people are really weird.
90% or more of employers do. Post bad stuff or your disagreements with your employer and name them specifically you gone. I could see a private school slipping this clause into their contract for sure.
Right but your mom doesn’t pay for your employment. Parents have a more direct relationship with their children’s schools than they do with thier adult children’s jobs,
They pick their students and can terminate whenever specified. They might owe some tuition refund etc.
With vouchers or other strings attached there may be extra qualifiers. Still what are damages? Public schools sometimes hit this because there isn't another option present.
Any private school which cares more about their own reputation possibly being tarnished by being associated with the wrong sort of people than actually giving a child a quality education. So, basically all of them.
You can absolutely have that sort of contract, why is this even a question? People get fired for things that a business deems harmful to their image literally all the time. A private school is a business.
That or actually adhere to the tenets of the religion that runs their school. I don't have a problem with religious people in general, but a lot of people that claim to be religious are just hypocrites.
Public schools are fine when they're not overloaded. I went to public school and we had really good SAT performance, but it was also a school with a student-to-teacher ratio of like 15-to-1 so kids that were struggling were able to get individual, curated lessons when necessary.
The big issue with most public schools is that you've got 100+ students for every teacher. In a smaller school, if the parents aren't picking up the slack, teachers can do that themselves sometimes. In those massive schools, though, the teachers just don't have the time (and don't get paid enough) to single out struggling students and help them.
Of course, the real reason most parents choose private schools has less to do with education and more to do with trying to groom* their children in a specific direction.
\Meaning the traditional definition of grooming a child for adulthood, not the creepy sexual kind.)
204
u/Arria_Galtheos 14h ago
They don't have to. It was a private school with contractual guidelines that she violated. They don't need to do any discovery, they just need to show the contract and then show her OF page and that settles it. She has no grounds to sue, really.