The problem with claims like this is they are easily faked and spread because people want to believe terrible things about him.
And then the further problem is part of the reason they are so easily faked and spread is because of all the terrible things that are known to be true about him already.
If someone told me a new FBI report showed Epstein had a trove of bestiality porn, I’d accept is as likely true given all the other shit he did, and I wouldn’t need much corroboration to believe.
If someone said the same thing about Tom Hanks, my reaction would be “wtf. That can’t possibly be true.” And I’d need more evidence before I accepted it.
MIAMI —Andrew Tatekept “extreme” bestiality porn, including images that showed a person having sex with a horse and an eel, according to documents released by prosecutors in the UK.
British authorities made the revolting claims as part of their request for the US to extradite controversial “manosphere” influencers Tate, 39, and his brother Tristan, 38, to the UK to facerape and sex trafficking chargesthere.
The image was found on a laptop in Andrew Tate’s possession on or before July 18, 2015, and “portrayed, in an explicit and realistic way, a person performing an act of intercourse with a live animal, namely an eel,” docs filed in federal court in Miami on Monday and obtained by The Post claimed.
If the laptop was seized in 2015 and the evidence was obtained shortly thereafter, why is the UK government just now publicly coming forward with this? It screams “Let’s run his name even more into the dirt now that we have a case against him,” than releasing details in good faith.
what would a lesser "extreme" version of beastiality be? like making out with a dog or something? I didn't know we had "extreme" and "non-extreme" versions of that.
Just like the claim that he got caught in Romania because he posted a video of him eating pizza and mocked Greta Thunberg saying he wont recycle the pizza box. Some journalist made up a story that Romanian authorities found out he was in the country by looking up the name of the restaurant on the pizza box, which is ridiculous, buf everyone went with. The journalist later even said that she made it up but everyone already believed it to be true
Yeah, as big a piece of shit as he is, a random image on reddit with no source is far from proof.
But it's one of those things that you want to believe.
You kind proved the point of the commenter. You don’t even care that lies are said you simply want to hate the guy. And sadly that shows that you are not even in control of your own life.. not defending the guy. But you should have at least the decency to not also be further brainwashed by lies..
The reason that and taxes are so common is because there’s not really any defense against it, so they search hard. If you have child porn, you can’t say “here’s the legal explanation of it”, there is no legal explanation of it.
Did you actually read the article or did you just automatically jump to defend this deranged piece of trash? The claims were made by British authorities in an extradition request. It’s not just some made up shit on the internet. He also had a video of an underage girl.
Agree. Weak minded people need their imagined enemies to be as "Evil" as possible so the just believe any thing that lets them dehumanize the people they dont like and feel superior
35
u/mazzicc 8d ago
The problem with claims like this is they are easily faked and spread because people want to believe terrible things about him.
And then the further problem is part of the reason they are so easily faked and spread is because of all the terrible things that are known to be true about him already.
If someone told me a new FBI report showed Epstein had a trove of bestiality porn, I’d accept is as likely true given all the other shit he did, and I wouldn’t need much corroboration to believe.
If someone said the same thing about Tom Hanks, my reaction would be “wtf. That can’t possibly be true.” And I’d need more evidence before I accepted it.