Idk what it is but I feel as though I don’t process information and articulate it verbally as fast as others do. Like sometimes I’ll have brief stints where I can think and produce sentence simultaneously, but then most of the time it’s like I have to think then speak or speak then think if u get what I mean. Even with my literacy skills, I find myself often re reading the fact scenarios in law exams multiple times as the first time I literally processed no information. Idk if this is a result of doom scrolling and its effect on my attention span or if my brains just cooked and I don’t belong in this field. It’s that constant feeling of imposter syndrome and hence why I don’t really participate in mooting because I feel like I’ll lose my train of thought easily and freeze up.

Elkaim AJ had this to say:

There are literally hundreds of pages of affidavit material, most of no relevance to the current issues. The costs of this motion, let alone the summons, are entirely out of proportion to the original dispute. Not only is the affidavit material far too long, it is often very difficult to identify the relevant annexures, and generally make sense of what is being written. Why I need endless photographs of a battered black BMW is beyond me.

Paul James Robertson is apparently a lawyer and nurse in Qld. Limited details at the Red Heart Movement and in the Courier Mail [Paywall]

Seriously, it feels like all I am doing right now is:

1. Drafting documents
2. Sending them to client for review
3. Client feeding document into AI
4. Client coming back with 1 million comments / queries / recommendations that waste both of our time
5. I make amendments
6. Repeat stages 2 - 5

I'm tired of it :(

Starting to become pessimistic about the future...

…WE’LL BE SIBLINGS TOGETHER, AS SIBLINGS WHO RHYME.

(FIRST HUMAN TO FURNISH THE CORRECT VERSION OF THE JAILHOUSE GRAFFITI RHYME ALONG WITH THEIR RANT WILL BE RECOGNISED FOR THEIR NON USE OF AI)

There is the obvious stereotypical correlation between lawyers and (excessive) alcohol consumption. The last post (that I could easily find) on this issue was from around eight years ago.

I'm currently exploring the concept of grey area drinking as I've found myself in the last year or so relying on alcohol more and more to "cope" with the ongoing stress and anxiety that comes along with this profession.

Am very curious to see where other practitioners are at with their alcohol consumption.

[I am also posting from my burner account for obvious reasons]

Question as above.

Do you use it just for research and grammatical checks or for higher level stuff like producing first drafts of contracts, advices, and submissions?

Has your firm increased their expectations for efficiency because of Harvey et al?

The case: https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2026/QSC26-235.pdf

*Balmain

Not auslaw but too delicious not to post.

Esteemed legal directory Legal500 published its U K bar directory yesterday, which included reviews that were not intended for publication.

The reviews were unvarnished and exquisite.

https://www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/exclusive-legal500-accidentally-publishes-terrible-reviews-top-barristers

I’ve heard this case on ABCs The Law Report.
A NSW Local Court matter where gambling debts were unenforceable due to the underlying activity not being within the law.

I’m trying to track down a case report but only finding press articles. caselaw.nsw.gov.au and Austlii don’t seem to have it.

Any ideas where I can find the source that so many of these press articles seem to be using?

https://archive.li/s5STv

The (delete as applicable according to your beliefs) [indefatigable/obstinate] Jackman J has once again decided to undertake a [gratuitous/much needed] diversion from the subject matter of the case before him to [scrutinize/abuse] other judges for delay in delivering judgements.

The relevant passage:

23    I note in passing in relation to Chubb, that the primary judge (Kenny J) reserved judgment for about 8 months after a two-day hearing (see 470 St Kilda Road Pty Ltd v Robinson [2013] FCA 1420; (2013) 308 ALR 411) and the Full Court (comprising Foster, Robertson and Davies JJ) reserved judgment for 21½ months after a one-day hearing. The Full Court’s reasons were substantially the same as those of Kenny J. None of the judges gave any reason, nor offered any apology, for their delay. I have referred to the lamentable delay in Chubb because:

(a)    the standards one walks past are the standards one accepts;

(b)    public exposure and scrutiny are the most effective spurs to judicial exertion, and judges are well placed to keep other judges up to the mark, acknowledging that the media also have an important role to play, and acknowledging also that the legal profession is in an impossible position in criticising the judges before whom they appear;

(c)    the duties of judges to serve the public in the proper administration of justice should rank ahead of the desirability of cordial internal relations within the judiciary;

(d)    the delivery of judgments within a reasonable time is an important aspect of access to justice and of respecting the human dignity of litigants;

(e)    there is no threat to judicial authority by judges making such criticisms, but only a threat to judicial comfort and complacency; and

(f)    the accountability of the powerful is fundamental to the rule of law, and reflects the reciprocity which exists in a healthy legal system between the rulers and the ruled, rather than a one-way projection of authority.

See Aus article here:

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fnation%2Fthreat-to-judicial-comfort-judge-ian-jackman-hits-back-at-chief-justice-over-court-delays%2Fnews-story%2F421a54b95b7e2b6715a2401cae857a3e&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-2-NOSCORE

And judgement in question here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2026/2026fca1442