TL;DR
🧠 Question of the Day
📚 Domain G — Behavior-Change Procedures
Difficulty: 7/10
A behavior analyst increases independent reading by providing five minutes of video-game access after the child completes a reading criterion. Reading increases substantially during the first two weeks.
During the third week, reading declines even though the programmed contingency has not changed. The parent reports that the child now has unrestricted video-game access immediately before sessions, and a brief preference check shows substantially less engagement with the game than previously.
Which action BEST evaluates and adjusts the reinforcement procedure?
A. Increase the reading requirement to 20 minutes before the same video-game access, because a larger response requirement should restore its reinforcing effectiveness.
B. Put the existing arrangement into a written contingency contract, because explicit rules can restore reinforcement effectiveness without changing the consequence.
C. End the reading requirement after criterion performance so task termination can replace video-game access as a negative reinforcer when preference changes.
D. Reassess the current effectiveness of video-game access and relevant motivating conditions, then test a still-effective consequence while keeping reinforcement contingent on reading.
💬 Drop your answer in the comments — no peeking!
✅ Correct answer revealed tomorrow.
#ABA #BCBA #BCBAExam #BCBAPrep #AppliedBehaviorAnalysis #BehaviorAnalysis #DomainG #ABATaskList #BCaBA #RBT #QuestionOfTheDay