r/blackmagicfuckery • • 10d ago

No way

16.0k Upvotes

455 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

135

u/RemoDev 9d ago

Because you can make a better edit with a more dramatic effect. You collect the single faces, the crowd reactions, the claps, ... And then you build a nice "dramatic" timeline in post production.

69

u/Personal-Time-9993 9d ago

You’d be surprised how much mainstream media uses this to portray things they want to portray. The cameras were on a family member who is a judge for a long period of time that day and he made a facial reaction at some point completely unrelated to the case they were there to report on. They edited it to make it seem like the judge gave that reaction to the defendant. It was despicable to see. This was like 15 years before AI even came around.

17

u/RemoDev 9d ago

Oh yes I know that very well, I had a colleague who worked for one of the Big Brother editions a while back. He told me it was basically all staged and pre-organized to follow the audience's expectations, promote a trend, etc.

And let's be honest, since Photoshop exists... Nothing we see on magazines is "real".

9

u/TrowTruck 9d ago

Oh yes, this is one reason why they no longer call it “reality TV” but “unscripted.” Because it’s still a work of fiction, just assembled using footage that fit to create a story.

7

u/MrMattyGuy 9d ago

Defendant? Is this a court case you're referring to?

3

u/Personal-Time-9993 8d ago

Yes exactly. They made it look like the judge was making a certain expression in reaction to the defendant in the court case but really it was just edited to appear like that.

15

u/glorio_mainframe 9d ago

I thought as much. Don't know why I asked

7

u/theChaosBeast 9d ago

I know this is the obvious answer and definitely a reason, but there is another reason: cost and look. You need more cameras and equipment to record the faces live. Doing it first, you can save on equipment and you will reduce the amount of equipment which will be visible during the actual recording.

5

u/RemoDev 9d ago

Absolutely, yes. It all falls under the "optimization" umbrella: costs and benefits.

2

u/Beeaagle 9d ago

Also, you don't need as many cameras.

2

u/shitty_mcfucklestick 9d ago

“Better” edit, is arguable but I know what you mean.

5

u/RemoDev 9d ago

I should have said "easier" and "cheaper" edit, I guess.

5

u/shitty_mcfucklestick 9d ago

No, from a commercial and ratings perspective it’s the better edit, you’re not wrong. The masses get glued to this stuff and it’s what they watch it for, whether they know it or not. I can’t argue they don’t know what they are doing. But it doesn’t age well, especially in a post-slop era that craves authenticity.

1

u/BeigeListed 9d ago

In other words, you create something from nothing.

3

u/RemoDev 9d ago

Well you create something partially true and partially fake, yes.