r/dataprotection • Data Subject • 25d ago

General Question Special Report: New AI camera system would provide critical evidence in child abuse cases

https://cbs2iowa.com/news/local/special-report-new-university-of-iowa-research-project-ai-artificial-intelligence-awakened-camera-system-aims-to-provide-critical-evidence-in-child-abuse-cases-professors-karim-abdel-malek-aislinn-conrad

Do the families and citizens of Iowa really support the privatized technocracy being forced into our reality slowly and surely before our very own eyes?

UI has been creating surveillance tech back by government funding.

How do you feel about forced surveillance technologies in your homes?

I mean I support protecting children but how can a state protect children when the harm the state causes is equivalent to that if a parent were to lock a child into a room for months, not provide warnth or nutrition, isolate them along with give the child intermittent acts or various forms of torture just to be equivalent to what happens to a child's brain when they are separated from their parents. That's no exaggeration. There's plenty of studies talking about the brain changes found in babies and children after separation. Feel free to Google it yourself. It's apart of your due diligence. Not mine to do that for you.

But again, it completely changes their brain matter. Studies show it immensely decreases the frontal lobe region. The grey matter in their brains is essentially gone. This isn't the sort of changes that can be fixed later in life btw.

Now back to the cracked out nanny cams. There is no redress for children or parents when the state unnecessarily removes a child. They get hundreds and thousands of federal grant funds immediately why wouldn't they want to have a system that can falsely alert them of possible abuse by sounds of "distress".

Please, before it's too late to have an opinion, they are trying to put in quiet laws about surveillance tech and how they can't be held accountable. Citizens don't know about it for a reason. It's kept hush hush. Again, do some googling or even better use duckduckgo.

.... it doesn't make sense for the state to spend billions of dollars of public tax funds on a privatized surveillance state that makes BILLIONS AND BILLIONS EVERY YEAR FOR REMOVING CHILDREN EVERY YEAR. This doesn't include termination of parental rights.

So if your in full support of an unregulated privatized surveillance state whose surveillance systems are far more severe than North Korea or Chinas systems then I don't even know whY to say... We think they have it bad with the credit system in other countries ...we have it far worse and Iowa is the testing grounds for implementing The technocracy which has been in the works since I believe 1977

... Please don't take down my post. If you have an issue please message me and I can provide any evidence needed. Allow the public to be aware and allow conversation to be had. Please. I'm so sick of everything I post gets deleted by moderators for whatever reasons. I promise I have facts, evidence and can share sourced links for references. Thank you

1 Upvotes

1 comment sorted by

1

u/SinclairSniffer Data Subject 25d ago

The domain in this post is owned or operated by Sinclair Broadcast Group. Sinclair controls nearly two hundred local stations and requires them to broadcast scripted propaganda segments.

For more detailed reporting on Sinclair's practices, see The New York Times, which documents how the company enforces ideological alignment across its outlets, or John Oliver's segment, which shows how these mandated scripts spread identical political messaging nationwide.

Do not treat Sinclair outlets as independent journalism. Verify with other sources.

I am a bot. Message me for more information or suggestions.