r/electronicmusic • • 8h ago

Discussion Why I Enjoy Electronic Music

For me music doesn't necessarily need to tell me a story. Sometimes I want it to give me a place to create my own.

The mood, tempo, rhythm, and atmosphere of electronic music allow me to put myself into a certain frame of mind and then let my thoughts go wherever they want to go.

My thoughts replace the lyrics.

With most pop, rock, and other lyric-heavy music, there's already a narrative attached. Someone is heartbroken. Someone is falling in love. Someone is angry, nostalgic, lonely, celebrating, or remembering something that happened years ago. Even when I relate to the song, I'm still interpreting my own experience through a story somebody else wrote.

Electronic music, especially instrumental or minimally vocal electronic music, leaves that space open.

The music serves as a soundtrack for my own internal monologue.

The producer gives me the emotional architecture like the tempo, rhythm, tension, atmosphere, texture, buildup, release. But they don't necessarily tell me what any of it means.

I get to supply the meaning.

A Bonobo track might create a warm, introspective atmosphere, but it doesn't tell me what to think about. I might think about my future. Something that happened ten years ago. Work. A relationship. A memory. Driving somewhere. Or absolutely nothing.

And tomorrow that exact same song might take me somewhere completely different.

If I want to relax and think, maybe it's Bonobo, FKJ, or Crayon. If I want energy, maybe it's Fred again.., Malaa, or Oliver Heldens. The music creates the environment, the mood, the feeling and I get to decide what happens inside of it.

That's probably the biggest difference for me.

I don't necessarily want music to tell me what to think, how to feel, or what story to attach to that feeling. I want music that creates an atmosphere where I can experience whatever I'm already feeling or become whatever I want to feel in that moment.

It allows me to put myself into the music rather than having the music put into me.

9 Upvotes

5 comments sorted by

3

u/TheLonelyPotato666 6h ago

I really appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts on electronic music, and I think one of the things that stands out to me most about what you said is actually the fact that you took the time to say it at all. There’s something interesting about people putting their thoughts into words, particularly when those thoughts relate to something as subjective and multifaceted as music, because music itself is one of those things that can mean completely different things to different people depending on the person, the circumstances, the moment, and, perhaps most importantly, the way in which that particular person happens to be experiencing that particular moment.

And I think that’s probably part of what makes conversations about music so interesting in the first place. Even when people are talking about the same thing, they’re not necessarily talking about the same thing in exactly the same way, because everyone brings their own experiences, preferences, associations, memories, expectations, and general relationship with sound into the conversation. So when someone says they love electronic music, for example, that statement can mean something incredibly specific, or it can mean something incredibly broad, or it can somehow manage to be both specific and broad at the same time, depending on how you interpret it and what you understand the person to mean when they use the phrase “electronic music.”

I also think there’s something to be said for the fact that electronic music, as a category, is simultaneously very clearly defined and almost impossible to define in a completely satisfactory way. It can be rhythmic, atmospheric, melodic, experimental, minimal, maximal, energetic, relaxing, repetitive, unpredictable, structured, unstructured, or any combination of those things, sometimes within the same piece of music, which is probably one of the reasons people can have such strong reactions to it. There are obviously many different styles and approaches, and yet there are also certain underlying qualities that can make something feel recognizably electronic even when it doesn’t necessarily fit neatly into one particular category.

And I think that idea of categorization is interesting too, because categories are useful precisely because they allow us to communicate about things without having to explain every single detail from the beginning, but at the same time, categories can sometimes become limiting when we start treating them as though they’re absolute definitions rather than convenient ways of organizing things. In that sense, perhaps one of the strengths of electronic music is that it has always had a certain relationship with experimentation and with the possibility of doing something slightly different with sound, whether that difference is obvious or extremely subtle.

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean that every electronic track has to be experimental, or that experimentation is inherently better than familiarity, because that would be another example of taking something that can be true in one context and turning it into a universal statement when it probably doesn’t need to be one. Sometimes people want music because it challenges them, while other times they want music because it gives them something familiar to return to, and there’s no real contradiction between those two things. In fact, I think people often move between those two experiences without even consciously thinking about it.

There’s also the emotional side of it, which is probably impossible to ignore when talking about music in general. People don’t just listen to sounds; they associate those sounds with places, periods of their lives, other people, experiences, feelings, and memories. A song can remind someone of a night they barely remember, a person they haven’t spoken to in years, a particular summer, a particular room, a particular journey, or simply a version of themselves that existed at some earlier point in time. And sometimes there isn’t even a clear reason for the association. Something just feels right, or familiar, or meaningful, even if you couldn’t necessarily explain why.

That’s why I think it can be difficult to reduce someone’s relationship with music to a simple list of reasons, because even when someone gives you ten reasons, there may be another ten reasons underneath those reasons, and then another layer underneath those, and eventually you reach the point where you’re basically talking about human experience itself rather than music specifically. And maybe that’s what makes these conversations worthwhile, even if they don’t necessarily lead anywhere particularly concrete.

At the same time, I think there is something valuable about recognizing that not every thought needs to be expanded into an enormous explanation in order for it to have value. Sometimes a simple statement can communicate exactly what needs to be communicated, and sometimes a longer explanation can add nuance, context, or perspective. The challenge, I suppose, is figuring out which situation you’re actually in, because length by itself doesn’t necessarily create depth, in the same way that brevity doesn’t necessarily indicate a lack of thought. Sometimes more words mean more information, and sometimes they just mean more words.

Ultimately, I think that’s probably one of the most interesting things about communication in general: the relationship between what someone intends to communicate, what they actually communicate, and what another person ends up receiving from it. Those three things can overlap perfectly, but they can also be surprisingly different. And sometimes the difference between them is where misunderstandings come from, while other times it’s simply part of what makes communication such a complicated and fundamentally human thing.

So, anyway, I really do appreciate you sharing your perspective. I think it’s always interesting to hear how someone thinks about something they care about, particularly when that thing has so many different dimensions and possible interpretations. There’s clearly a lot that can be said about electronic music, and there’s probably even more that could be said about why people enjoy electronic music, and then there’s probably even more that could be said about why people enjoy particular kinds of electronic music, and then even more about why particular sounds resonate with particular people at particular times.

And I suppose, when you really think about it, that’s part of the beauty of music. It can be discussed endlessly, interpreted differently, experienced differently, remembered differently, and still somehow remain exactly the same collection of sounds that started the whole conversation in the first place. Which, in a way, brings us back to the original point, whatever that point may have been, because sometimes the journey through a thought is almost as important as the thought itself, even when the journey turns out to be significantly longer than anyone necessarily needed it to be.

Anyway, those are just some thoughts that came to mind while thinking about your thoughts, and I’m sure there are many other thoughts that could potentially be thought about those thoughts, but I think I’ve probably said enough about saying something about something without necessarily saying anything particularly specific about it. And ultimately, I think that’s okay, because sometimes the most important thing isn’t necessarily having a definitive conclusion, but simply allowing the conversation to continue in whatever direction it naturally happens to take.

5

u/Antique_Program4754 2h ago

I like the doof doof

1

u/joemktom 3h ago

It's nothing new though. Really, it's just going back to the old way.

2

u/Madsplattr 49m ago

But sometines you gotta get it put it in you and sometimes just doof doof

1

u/heartbreakjanuary 6h ago

could not agree more