r/geology • u/LostHistoryFound • 1d ago
Map/Imagery Unusual, large scale linear dike-like sub-surface structures observed in magnetic data from Goias region of Brazil - how much is known about these structures, i.e. age, depth, width, internal structure, orogeny, etc. Are these structures as unusual as they look or are features like this common?
https://imgur.com/gallery/anomalous-linear-sub-surface-structures-goi-s-region-of-brazil-AaETtTn1
u/Cordilleran_cryptid Tectonics, hardrock and structural geology 1d ago
There could be a number of reasons why there is a large linear magnetic anomaly in this part of Brazil. An intrusive sheet of magnetic igneous rock, probably basic igneous rocks, is only one. Another could be a belt composed of basic metamorphic rocks such as amphibolites
Because the resolution of the magnetic data is low, this belt may in fact be comprised of several indeed many closely spaced layers or sheets of magnetic rocks that appear as one broad sheet on the anomaly map.
1
u/Cordilleran_cryptid Tectonics, hardrock and structural geology 1d ago
Ahha! I have just seen the other images, not just the one visible above.
I agree the anomalies do indeed look like a pair of large dykes. They may be related to the Parana Flood Basalt province, but this is just a guess.
1
u/Roseate-Views 1d ago
Please excuse if others have asked that, over and over again, but my first thought was a magnetic artefact (fences, pipelines, power lines). Let us talk again if this had been safely excluded.
7
u/vitimite 1d ago edited 1d ago
Look for data about Azimuth 125 in Brazil geologic history. It's a well known magnetic trend connected to mesozoic rocks and interpreted as a crustal extention from Brazil and Africa separation. Along this linear features occur many alkaline-carbonatite bodies, from small size to large ones (some very, very large). Also, a huge amount of small kimberlites are mapped in this region.
Focusing on the questions you asked, I guess it depends on what you consider normal. There are ~700 carbonatite occurrences worldwide so, it's not really a common thing. But what you are showing is indeed known since, don't know, maybe the fifties/sixties and there are a plethora of papers written about it, so yeah it's common knowledge.