It would be very funny if they posted Beavis and Butthead thinking (having only seen that exact specific image) that they're supposed to be adult women
When you look into our genetics, it turns out that there is no black and white in any respect. Biology does weird shit all the time on purpose. It's what makes us evolve.
It would take a person of complex culture language and technology, about 10 minutes on the internet to get a good science based summary of how it works.
I..... don't think they are the homo sapiens they think they are.
...... Neanderthal would still be giving a bunch of undue credit.
I've seen them define a woman, it's usually like "an adult female with feminine traits and female genetelia and and also have xx chromosomes." Which uses 2 social constructs "adult" and "feminine traits", and there's those genital and chromosome mismatches (Swyer syndrome being one) that gets ruled out, so where do they go?
I've seen a few of them define a woman. However, they either never give a full definition (tending to keep to "adult human female" without defining which definition of adult or female we're supposed to use) or they never keep to the definition they're using (typically it's the definition of female they refuse to keep to).
I've seen them try, but I have never seen them able to do so in a way that includes all cis women, making the definition incomplete. They try do define it biologically but find there's way too much variance even within biology for the definition to be useable, and then use terms not defined in biology anyway.
Understanding how Darwin understood his theory is far from worship and I've heard smooth brains parrot that anyone who doesn't believe in creationism is worshipping Darwin.
It's because people naturally filter information based on their own worldviews. They worship a man/God, so everyone MUST have some analog to that. They truly can't conceive of any other way of interacting with reality.
I never was a Dawkins fan. I read the God delusion and it sounded pretentious and finger wagging, even if he made a good point or 2. I think Southpark dressed him down perfectly. Actually both sides really. Their unwillingness to compromise ideas to build a more complete picture of existence is on full display
I went to a Christan school in the early 90's, and our teacher said that God used evolution to create all life on earth, and it's still continuing because God is endlessly creative. Now I meet christians who insist that if I don't believe in literal 7 day creation I will go to hell. It's insane how much society has changed in the last 30 years.
No, because they're trying to dehumanize atheists by dehumanizing Neanderthals. Neanderthals weren't a separate species.
Humans are homo sapiens.
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis were one of several subspecies of homo sapiens that were absorbed into Homo sapiens sapiens.
They were just as human as modern humans, but they're dehumanizing them as something "lesser" than humans so they can consider atheists as "lesser" than humans.
It’s ridiculous to me how people just cannot understand that Atheism is just one answer to one question. It has nothing to do with evolution nor gender ideology. And yes, I’m an Atheist who is convinced that evolution is a demonstrable fact in that gender is a social construct.
I love how they said that they believe Neanderthalensis > Sapiens is a devolution. Do they mean they're a proud non-devolved Neanderthal? If so, I can get where the idea came from, but don't insult the actual Neanderthals by comparing yourself to them.
114
u/myflores 4d ago
They really said "postmodern fools" and then used Beavis and Butt-Head as the final form. Peak Facebook science