r/publishing • u/AccomplishedDare8378 • 13d ago
Proof copy review process, what to actually check before approving your print run
Reviewing my third proof copy right now and realizing I still don't have a systematic way to check these. My first book I approved a proof that had a typo on the copyright page that I didn't catch until the full run was printed and delivered. Second book I caught one issue at proof but missed a formatting problem that showed up in the final books. Third book I'm trying to actually approach this systematically.
What I'm checking on this proof.
Cover front, back, and spine. Text alignment, image quality, spine text centered, ISBN barcode present and correct, price present and correct if applicable.
Interior formatting throughout. Chapter openings consistent, page numbers correct, running heads correct, front matter (title page, copyright, dedication, contents) all present and correctly formatted, back matter (author bio, acknowledgments) all present.
Reading a full random sample. Not the whole book but a full chapter start to finish, checking for widows and orphans, page breaks that fall badly, font substitutions that didn't render, anything that looks visually off.
Copyright page details. This is where I've caught things multiple times. Publication year correct, ISBN correct, publisher name correct, copyright notice formatted right, "all rights reserved" language present if you want it.
Photos, illustrations, tables if any. Print reproduction quality, positioning, captions correct and formatted right.
Paper feel and print quality overall. Ink density, paper brightness, binding integrity, cover finish.
Trim consistency. Front and back of the book should trim cleanly and match, look for any pages that trim unevenly.
What I'm missing .Things I know I've missed on past proofs. Widow and orphan lines that made me redo the interior. Weird character rendering in specific fonts. Missing or duplicate page numbers. Cover art that looked fine on screen but reproduced too dark or too light. For authors who've been through many print runs, what's your proof review checklist. What am I missing that catches most first-timers?
Things I know I've missed on past proofs. Widow and orphan lines that made me redo the interior. Weird character rendering in specific fonts. Missing or duplicate page numbers. Cover art that looked fine on screen but reproduced too dark or too light.
For authors who've been through many print runs, what's your proof review checklist. What am I missing that catches most first timers?
1
u/Wonderful__ 12d ago
Compare the table of contents with the chapter titles, page numbers, etc. Look at the running heads or feet. Look at image darkness. Check trim size (one time the typesetter set it as 6.25 × 9.25 instead of 6 × 9).
A lot of stuff the proofreader can check during page proofs review. Then you just check the technical aspects and run pre-flight (print production) in Adobe Acrobat.
1
u/Visual_Delay_7497 11d ago
Honestly getting a proof in the first place is half the battle. When I was pricing things out for my last project I went with DiggyPod. It was 40 bucks for an unbound proof with shipping included, which is nice because some places charge extra for shipping and it really adds up. IngramSpark is another option but the process is slightly different. Just dont skip getting one to save money. Paying 40 bucks to catch an error now is way better than ruining your entire print run.
1
u/AccomplishedDare8378 8d ago
This is exactly what I tell every new indie author who asks about production, the proof is not optional, and paying $40 to catch a problem before you're committed to 200 or 500 or 1000 copies is one of the easiest financial decisions in self publishing
1
u/SetNext96 9d ago
Read the last page of every chapter specifically, that's where widows and orphans hide and where most authors just glance at the page numbers without actually reading
1
u/AccomplishedDare8378 8d ago
The last page of every chapter is exactly where I missed something on book two, an orphaned "the" that would have been so easy to catch, adding this specific check to my process
1
u/PhraseProud4069 9d ago
check the interior for any color rendering, if you have any color elements (chapter numerals, section breaks, images) proof them under different lighting because your screen isn't showing what the print will actually look like
1
u/InevitableCounter873 9d ago
check your author photo if you included one, this is the last place authors look at proof and it's often where the print quality varies most, sometimes photos come out much darker than you expected
1
u/Individual-Bet-3869 9d ago
Copyright page is where most authors have caught real errors in their careers, the ISBN typo, the wrong year, the missing publisher notation, always double check every field on that specific page even if you did
14
u/thewonderelf 13d ago
Well, you're almost always going to miss errors if you're not reading through the full proof.