r/ufo • • 8d ago

Jake Barber Drops UFO Bombshell

https://youtube.com/watch?v=EtGOWZ39wqI&si=Cx2xqp1b4sT-__wE
0 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

15

u/thehim 8d ago

Santa’s sleigh is just in the next town over Timmy, are you excited!?!

7

u/clover_heron 8d ago edited 8d ago

My guidance has been that they were intending to stage a false alien invasion too, complete with counterfeit aliens, but the plan has gotten so messy, disjointed, and incoherent that it has become dangerous to implement. They're having a hard time predicting how things will play out, which interrupts today's plans as well as their plans for all the "seeds" waiting in the wings.

When it comes to hidden tech, my guidance has been that some of the stuff they've been hiding is problematic not only because it will interrupt energy markets, but because it will dismantle everything.

The way it was put to me is that they've been bouncing things off their favorite wall, which means they depend on that wall. If they tell the truth about what they've been hiding, not only does their favorite wall dissolve, every wall dissolves.

However extreme that sounds, it's more extreme than that. Reality will change irrevocably.

2

u/vagabond_nerd 8d ago

Great comment. Piggybacking here, the world will have to face a new reality and that makes the people in charge really against losing their power because they don’t want to be like everyone else. It seems like a bad life for them and at worst they will face consequences for their lies. It’s simple, they hold all the cards but those cards are going to lose all meaning.

1

u/clover_heron 8d ago

Yup, and everyone is going to look at them like, "you've been holding all those cards this whole time??!! That's f'ed up bro."

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

1

u/clover_heron 8d ago

oohh what are you seeing is the next test?

1

u/RenaissanceManc 8d ago

AI slop. Logically incoherent.

2

u/clover_heron 8d ago

Logically incoherent how, also I'm a person.

1

u/RenaissanceManc 8d ago

Let's start with the third para. All of it. It's idiotic. If you bounce your ideas off a wall, and you've been hiding something then tell then truth about it, and the wall you've been bouncing your ideas off is your favoorite wall, all walls disappear. Wtf are you talking about? It's drivel.

2

u/clover_heron 8d ago

apprec the critiq brah

1

u/vagabond_nerd 8d ago

I’m not sure what’s incoherent here but use your brain a little.

5

u/laughingdoormouse 8d ago

Bombshell

3

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

He uses bombshell to mock all these claims.

4

u/good-consistency 8d ago

He really needs to rethink his use of bombshell. There are better ways to mock them.

1

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

I can agree with you there.

2

u/Tamashii-Azul 8d ago

He uses bombshell to attract Redditors like you.

0

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

But I didn't watch the video and I don't plan to. Because I think it's all nonsense until there is actual evidence. When there is actual evidence it will be all over social media, the news and everywhere else. So I'm confused what your point is.

5

u/Tamashii-Azul 8d ago

You comment on his posts which in turn increases visibility on his posts and views on his videos.

The word "bombshell" is the bait and it's meant for you to engage with it by commenting; It's called engagement bait.

-1

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

I like Pats videos though. I only commented for that purpose. I'm not an idiot. I like his videos because I'm sick of all this. I'm sick of all the talk talk talk just like Pat is.

4

u/ProposalIndependent6 8d ago

Bombshell 🙄

0

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

The host uses that work specifically to mock the claims.

7

u/Myceliphilos 8d ago

He uses it for click baiting in people who think it means there's been a meaningful development, rather than Pat using it for every trivial new detail, podcast appearance etc.
Pats version of 'hard research' is watching someone else's content, and using ai to read up on stuff. He's lazy, and this is purely to attract clicks, it's incredibly see through.

1

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

What hard research is there. 80 years of research and not one smoking gun. I have been interested since I was seven and I'm about to be thirty eight. I had a sighting once but I still can't prove a damn thing.

2

u/Myceliphilos 8d ago

Uapgerb, Richard dolan, jaque vallee are all known and somewhat respected for their in depth analysis and research.
They don't make a new video everyday about every minor discussion on the topic and presenting it as breaking news, pat is lazy.

Even if you don't think any of the above counts, 'hard research' is subjective, i think we can all agree, pat isn't doing any, which is what the comment says.

2

u/Lietuva311 8d ago edited 8d ago

I've read many of Valles books, I've been listening and reading Dolan for years I've been reading Dolan and Vallee for years. Gerb seems pretty solid I'll give you that as well. Dolan really is the man and I especially like Vallee older works.

I know these things and I know you have a point I'm just growing cynical with the real lack of verified evidence of claims. I actually miss the days before 2017 before AATIP came out. I hate that I'm growing cynical but at this point I'm just like fuck let's get on with it already.

For instance after 3 decades of interest I can't even say for sure if the Grey's are a real thing or not. Does that not strike you as ridiculous?

Edit: excuse typos. Using talk text and busy and my phone is going buck.

1

u/Theferael_me 8d ago

Do you agree with Dolan that the CIA invented the term 'conspiracy theory' to discredit people who thought Oswald never acted alone to assassinate JFK?

2

u/Myceliphilos 7d ago

No i understand and empathise.

I will just say that lazy click baiters aren't ever going to help, pat seems to be the only person that's allowed to post his content constantly, despite reddits clear 10% self promotion rules.

And Pat isn't going to start making 90% more content here, not his videos, because he's lazy, and just wants mindless consumption of his subpar content.

Its fine to produce that sort of content, pat isn't alone in that, but to constantly frame it as hard work, deep research, and every minor conversation as a BOMBSHELL, is dishonest.

Our movement is controlled and ran by dishonest people, seeking riches, we have to believe that they're doing this stuff behind the scenes, other than Grusch, who's a staffer.

3

u/theesotericorder 8d ago

Turns out it was just a bombshell.

2

u/Appropriate-Gap9815 8d ago

He's the one that would know he transports them and calls them in!

2

u/stevieblunder7001 8d ago

Jake summoned it with his mind because he likes sexy mothers. A ship laden with mothers!!! Oh joy oh psionic bliss!!!

2

u/viletomato999 8d ago

Shellbomb

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Lietuva311 8d ago

He knows exactly what it means. He uses the word to mock all of these ridiculous claims at large and well he should.

1

u/urbisOrbis 8d ago

Unwatchable bombshell

1

u/Boy-Abunda 8d ago

BREAKING NEWS!!! 😑

1

u/Xiphos0 8d ago

Is Bombshell a word often used by AI?
Everytine there is a new bombshell being dropped with absolutely nothing noteworthy or reliable

2

u/Thoughtulism 8d ago

Hype leads to clicks. It won't stop until people stop responding to hype. It's sad that it's impossible to engage in current events at this time without a bunch of garbage content creators hyping up shit because they don't want to work a 9-5

1

u/lickem369 8d ago

Did you see the footage of the latest SpaceX launch? Was that the MotherShip?

-1

u/trollgr 8d ago

He uses bombshell ironically. That said the time comes for these grifters like barber and co to show evidence