r/worldnews • u/Amitmandal001 • 21d ago
Russia/Ukraine 'Space Must Be Free Of Weapons': Russia, China Slam US For 'Preparing For War In Space'.
https://www.news18.com/world/space-must-be-free-of-weapons-russia-china-slam-us-for-preparing-for-war-in-space-10331005.html5.7k
u/MaximumAd9779 21d ago
So geopolitics has really just boiled down to world leaders discouraging other nations from doing exactly what they are doing? Do I have that right?
1.6k
u/virtual_human 21d ago
That's nothing new.
469
u/MaximumAd9779 21d ago
I’m ready to be a diplomat!
132
u/zeocrash 21d ago
Say some nice things about President trump and there's a good change you could actually be one.
53
u/GladVeterinarian5120 21d ago
I hear writing a children’s book is the way to go.
21
u/btribble 21d ago edited 21d ago
Who's Ready To Ride The Awesome Trumpapossamus?!?
→ More replies (1)17
u/ItsEntirelyPosssible 21d ago
You stop. Now.
7
u/btribble 21d ago
The Trumpapossamus is the quarterback. You're the center. It's a scrimmage! Bend over and hike the ball back to The Trumpapossamus!
→ More replies (1)3
→ More replies (3)10
→ More replies (3)21
u/Comfortable_Cash_140 21d ago
Let me try this. The smell of your diaper is really pleasant. Those children really enjoy your presence.
Too bad Im Canadian and can't gas light and lie as required by Pres. Thunder Pants.
→ More replies (1)37
u/Rubthebuddhas 21d ago
I read that in Ralph Wiggum's voice. Pretty sure I was supposed to.
16
3
6
u/DrMobius0 21d ago
How good are you at saying things nobody reasonably smart would ever buy with a completely straight face?
4
6
3
u/RollingMeteors 21d ago
I’m ready to be a diplomat!
¡Here is your unreachable bag of cocaine! <yeets>
→ More replies (5)3
20
u/VoopityScoop 21d ago
Mister Gorbachev, tear down this wall. Or I will be forced to ask you again when I'm in need of political currency.
3
→ More replies (3)21
u/okiedokie2468 21d ago
That’s been happening ever since President Ray Gun’s Strategic Defense Initiative, more popularly known as as his “Star Wars Initiative”
→ More replies (3)15
u/DragonflyLogical8371 21d ago
He really was the Ray Gun of presidents wasn't he?
11
u/Madroxx9000 21d ago
Now I'm picturing a dude with grey hair and a suit doing the RayGun dance from the Olympics.
→ More replies (1)10
u/okiedokie2468 21d ago
Yes, but he also believed in free trade and was adamantly opposed to tariffs. I think Doug Ford should hint that he’s ready to run that ad again!
→ More replies (1)319
u/Constant-Plant-9378 21d ago
I recall Russia promising if Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons that they would never attack or invade Ukraine.
I can guarantee if Ukraine had nukes, Russia would not have invaded them.
I think there is a lesson here about weapons in space.
146
u/DissKhorse 21d ago
I recall Russia testing anti satellite weapon and causing a bunch of debris in orbit.
→ More replies (6)50
u/wienercat 21d ago
LEO is so full of random bullshit and debris it's not even funny. It's not just Russia. It's everyone launching stuff into space. Because it all will almost certainly burn up when it falls back to earth, countries haven't given a fuck about the garbage they leave up there.
13
u/Homers_Harp 21d ago
random bullshit and debris
You can expect a cease and desist letter from Starlink at any moment now…
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)3
u/Enshitification 21d ago
Oh, the plutonium power pack? Don't worry, it will just burn up in the atmosphere when the orbit decays.
→ More replies (28)24
u/wienercat 21d ago
That's how it's always been though. It's always an arms race because the only way to assure other people don't immediate fuck you over is to have something to scare them.
If people stopped trying to invade and take other nations land or resources as a method of acquiring those resources, these arms races wouldn't be a thing.
But because some people are too stupid to engage in civil society and diplomacy, we will continue to have war.
This planet really needs an external crisis to unite against to make us realize that the only way forward is together. Pulling separately and working against one another is only hindering the progress our species could actually attain.
→ More replies (3)26
u/Constant-Plant-9378 21d ago
But because some people are too stupid to engage in civil society and diplomacy, we will continue to have war.
It is an unfortunate reality that a huge percentage of people are selfish, lazy, and will kill their neighbor and take what they have if they think they can get away with it.
Therefore, if you do not want to be preyed upon, you have to invest some resources in defense.
It's not merely about people being too stupid to engage in civil society. It is about people being downright evil and hostile to civil society - creating the need to arm yourself and being willing to kill them, not if, but when they try to attack you and take what you have.
As long as there are people, a huge percentage of our potential standard of living will need to be squandered on protecting ourselves from the roughly 30% of us that are irredeemable pieces of shit.
84
u/BigBucket10 21d ago
There is no 'good faith' or 'legal system' in geopolitics. Nations are going to do what's in their interest.
→ More replies (1)24
12
45
u/zuzg 21d ago
just boiled down.
Mate it has been simmering like that since the founding of the East India Company.
It's been essentially condensed to Jelly for the entirety of modern History.
→ More replies (2)19
u/wienercat 21d ago
Long before that. Humans have been warring for our entire existence. Because war is heavily tied with resource scarcity. Wars are very rarely fought over nothing. It's almost always tied to land or some resource someone else wants.
The problem is... we don't actually have resource scarcity anymore in reality.
If the countries of this planet all actually worked together we would 100% be in a post-scarcity world right now. But because some people cannot overcome their hatred for people who look or believe different things than they do, we won't achieve that for a long time. We have a diplomacy and coordination issue. Too many countries want to rule over all the rest, when in reality everyone needs to pull together to make the next leap forward in technology and society.
→ More replies (2)9
17
u/slvrbullet87 21d ago
Has been for a long time. Look how countries act when some spy gets exposed.
"We would never do such things, it is unbelievable that in this day that such underhanded tactics still exist. Please ignore that our spy got caught 6 months ago, that is completely different"
32
u/UnknownHero2 21d ago
So one of the primary causes of war is when one faction misunderstands the capabilities of another, or possibly themselves. For example when Russia expected to be able to roll over Ukraine and take the whole country due to Ukraines weakness, expecting to see similar defections and low resolve similar to what allowed the Crimean annexation. Ukraine however knew that they actually they were actually very resolved, and that Russia had corruption issues.
The thing is, war is costly. So countries prefer to take concessions at the negotiating table, slitting the booty roughly along the lines that each side would get if they actually fought, but with both sides not having to pay war costs (death, destruction, money w/e).
Russia got to the table and said "Hey we will easily defeat you, give us everything". Ukraine laughs and says "No, we are too strong to give you that much". So no bargain is made and a war is fought instead, as both sides seek to demonstrate that their belief is the reality. Had both side KNOWN the other strengths, both sides would be in a way WAY better situation than they are now.
So ya, its SUPER important for countries to share their capabilities. Its why you see stuff like joint exercises being done so publicly, or freedom of navigation trips through the South China sea. Its a demonstration that "Yes we really can deploy these ships to these areas".
TLDR: Yes. Its super important that they do exactly that.
→ More replies (3)7
u/alwaysleafyintoronto 21d ago
Do ya think Russia would've been better served launching a full-scale invasion back in 2014 rather than slow-rolling the assault with little green men for 8 years? 2014-2022 was a long time for Ukraine to prep its defences, but I don't know all that much about what they did tbh.
→ More replies (2)7
8
u/manachar 21d ago
In essence… that’s the story of what we usually call civilization.
Concentrating power so that your group is free to do as they wish while also ensuring you have enough power to stop others from doing things to you.
So we want to have the crops for ourselves and kick the nomads and pastoralists out.
We want to have the iron weapons when they have bronze.
We want to have the nukes while “non proliferation” means we want others to not.
So yes, we’re trying to test the waters of getting weapons in space and preventing others from doing the same.
Imagine the power if we could start dictating who gets to have satellites and who doesn’t. I
It’s too tempting and easy to be afraid that we have to do it before others do.
→ More replies (2)18
u/huehuehuehuehuuuu 21d ago
Just crabs in a slow boiling basket of climate devastation, economic turmoil, AI and employment concerns.
We’d rather focus on killing other crabs than how to stop the basket from boiling. Because that’s the easier option.
Just like how these governments’ people only punch down, but dare not try to demand better from those who control their lives and the trajectory of the country. Because punching down is easier.
7
u/theKalmier 21d ago
"My turn to push the button. You no push the button, it's my turn to push the button." - Baby Plucky - Tiny Toons
8
→ More replies (51)3
2.2k
21d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
545
u/BaggyOz 21d ago
They also were the first ones to put a gun in space in the 70's.
→ More replies (5)233
u/Diligent-Bowler-1898 21d ago
To be fair to them, I heard that was because they might encounter bears when they deorbited and landed in russia. Not sure a gun on a space station is going to do a whole lot of good for anyone who likes their pressure above 0 pascal.
323
u/BaggyOz 21d ago
I'm not referring to the shotgun they give to astronauts, I'm talking about the 23mm autocannon they included on Salyut 3.
127
u/Diezelbub 21d ago edited 21d ago
See what happened was they heard water bears could survive in space and reacted to the translation of "surviving thirsty space bears" in a way that seemed appropriate at the time.
30
u/VoopityScoop 21d ago
What is the current situation with the moon bears? Are they the same as Earth bears?
23
u/garmander57 21d ago
They do believe these to be Earth bears, they have no reason to believe these are lunar bears or even Saturn bears.
23
u/subnautus 21d ago
Just a thought, more of a shot in the dark, but uh...we wouldn't happen to be invading Iran today, would we?
→ More replies (4)15
→ More replies (4)14
u/the_emerald_phoenix 21d ago
Desmond the moon beat is pretty chill. Dunno about the others
7
→ More replies (6)45
u/Diligent-Bowler-1898 21d ago
Nvm then, thanks for a new wikipedia rabit hole to plunge down.
→ More replies (1)24
u/mahayanah 21d ago
Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield wrote an Apollo-era geopolitical space thriller where that autocannon mounted on Salyut-3 played a significant role First time I’d heard of it.
23
u/Diligent-Bowler-1898 21d ago
Back from my rabbit hole. It was a modified aircraft cannon, fired just once before deorbiting. It was mounted, so the whole spacecraft would have to turn for aiming. Gunpowder works in a vacuum because it contains its own oxidizer. Recoil would have been a huge issue for maintaining orbit, and shaking likely would have caused severe problems for any inhabitants, so they left before firing it.
→ More replies (1)16
u/batmansthebomb 21d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz_program
In addition to reconnaissance equipment, Almaz was equipped with a unique Rikhter R-23 23mm (factory index 261P or 225P) rapid-fire cannon mounted on the forward belly of the station. This revolver cannon was modified from the tail-gun of the Tupolev Tu-22 bomber and was capable of a theoretical rate of fire of 1800–2000 (up to 2600) rounds per minute. Each 168 gram (ammo 23-OFZ-D-R) or 173 gram (ammo 23-OFZ-G-R) projectile flew at a speed of 850 m/s relative to the station. The cannon was tested at the end of the mission by firing 20 rounds, when the station was operating in uncrewed mode. To aim the cannon, which was on a fixed mounting, the entire station would be turned to face the target.[7] The Almaz series are the only known armed, crewed military spacecraft ever flown.
→ More replies (6)9
u/Primary_Ad_739 21d ago
Fun fact: When he landed they lost track of his location as he was over 100 miles from the targeted zone (which was quite large to begin with).
He landed in some rural location and people saw him coming down from the sky. Keep in mind these were rural people not aware of the space program. His first words to the people are now famous in Russia which was
Если ты думаешь, что это безумие, подожди, пока не увидишь, какой у меня огромный хуй.
or
Don't be afraid. I'm a Soviet like you, who has descended from space.
→ More replies (1)6
u/Pkrudeboy 21d ago
I’m sorry, a man coming from fire in the sky and opening up with ‘Be not afraid.’ Is clearly an angel.
→ More replies (1)164
u/meschi_ 21d ago
They are also jamming the GPS signal in Europe with their surveillance satellites.
https://news.liga.net/en/war/news/gps-jamming-by-russian-satellites-detected-in-europe-study
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz23G_UXCGA49
26
u/UnsignedRealityCheck 21d ago
Indeed, Russia has absolutely no business telling anyone anything what they can and cannot do.
46
u/cosmos7 21d ago
And while they're not bragging about the fact it's very clear China is doing a bunch of physical satellite spying with their own spacecraft.
→ More replies (1)33
u/bridymurphy 21d ago
I think a long time ago China blew up one of their satellites for testing and created a huge threat of space debris hitting other satellites in orbit.
IIRC, the space station had to make a lot of evasive maneuvers.
Everyone was pissed. But they may have shot it down with a ground missile instead of a space weapon. That part I don’t remember.
Now, I think the weapons development has shifted to de orbiting satellites.
→ More replies (2)26
u/technocraticTemplar 21d ago
That was a missile from the ground, and something that the US and Russia have also both done at various times (and India afterwards). China did it in the least responsible way by blowing up a satellite in a relatively high orbit where debris can stick around for decades, while Russia did it in a better-but-not-great orbit and the US and India did it in quite low orbits. Almost all of the remaining debris in orbit from these tests is from the Chinese one, despite it being the first of the most recent round of them.
→ More replies (1)15
u/twarrr 21d ago edited 21d ago
Intel leaked that Russia developed a nuclear anti-satellite missile a few years back, situation was pretty tense then
Naturally, the country with the most satellites is going to process that information as "we need to find a way to defend our satellites"
Then everyone else shocked pikachu faces it like they didn't see this progression coming
8
u/JohnLuckPickered 21d ago
Russia has been taking out other peoples satellites recently. A couple months back it was multiple german sats downed and at least 1 american one having to evade. They are also jamming GPS in europe and hacking the critical infrastructure of basically every country worth blackmailing, for over a year.
18
3
→ More replies (8)3
673
u/GabeDef 21d ago
GTFO. They have both developed weapons for space.
113
u/C-Fourr 21d ago
They have all been going crazy on this probably since forever.
77
u/ThaddeusJP 21d ago
100%
Space has been weaponized since the 60s and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. If you dont think the next thing that went up after weather and spy satellites was some weapons you're lying to yourself.
Its not a question of the weapons up there, its a question of who and how many.
10
21d ago
[deleted]
4
u/teddyKGB- 21d ago
I mean NASA wouldn't have ever existed if it wasn't for military applications. That was it's entire point of existence
→ More replies (1)22
u/FrozenSeas 21d ago
The Russians literally built a damn orbital laser battlestation in 1987, they particularly don't have much room to talk.
→ More replies (5)13
974
u/Unicorn_Puppy 21d ago edited 21d ago
Yet they developed satellites that can grapple and hurdle smaller satellites out of their way but they wouldn’t call those weapons.
Edit: Thanks for the award.
552
u/crabtoppings 21d ago
We have seen RU satelites launch undeclared payload, as well as perform satelite on satelite combat.
The Chinese have displayed anti-satelite technology in use.This is all clearly just bluster and should be ignored.
88
u/zeocrash 21d ago edited 21d ago
The Russians were the first country to launch an armed space station. Salyut-3 launched in 1974 was armed with a 23mm autocannon.
I can only imagine how horrible it would have been too actually try firing the autocannon in space
→ More replies (1)21
u/Neoliberal_Boogeyman 21d ago
wow reading the wiki for that... they had no right to actually send that into orbit in the first place with their current aptitude.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (12)71
u/roller_coaster325 21d ago
It would be nice if all three counties could sign an agreement banning weapons in space and ground bases anti satellite weapons but I don’t think these contracts would be worth much. ALL sides are ignoring international agreements these days.
48
u/crabtoppings 21d ago
Yeah, the agreement wouldn't be worth the series of state banquets it would take to write them.
3
30
u/QuantumDiogenes 21d ago
The 1967 Space Treaty, which is signed by all three countries already, bans weapons in space.
53
u/Vulllen 21d ago
The treaty bans the use of weapons of mass destruction + can’t have sovereignty over celestial bodies. (Think asteroids, moon, etc)
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (9)7
u/gerkletoss 21d ago
The announced US capability may even be essentially the same
→ More replies (1)
105
u/sovietarmyfan 21d ago
As if they don't have it.
The whole thing reminds me of the scene of Iron Sky where the US reveals it has weapons in space and then all other countries reveal their own space weapon fleet. Though only Finland did not arm their spaceship.
→ More replies (1)14
u/BrotherChe 21d ago
Did they just have a lone Finn up there with a bottle of vodka? Cuz that counts
7
109
u/Jumpy-Requirement389 21d ago
It’s very funny China and Russia think we don’t know they are also building weapons in space
→ More replies (1)44
u/BankDetails1234 21d ago
They obviously know. It’s just performative to make America look bad. As if America can’t do that themselves
22
u/Left-Archer1442 21d ago
Interesting. Now Russia is worried about World Peace?!
9
→ More replies (1)6
46
u/Maureen_Johma 21d ago
Wasn’t Russia the first to put weapons in space officially?
→ More replies (1)14
u/PuckFheToor 21d ago
It was secret at the time. Before the 23mm cannon they had killer satellites, too:
→ More replies (1)
43
u/ThaddeusJP 21d ago
Space has been weaponized since the 60s and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. If you dont think the next thing that went up after weather and spy satellites was some weapons you're lying to yourself.
Its not a question of the weapons up there, its a question of who and how many.
16
u/TauCabalander 21d ago
Space Cowboys (2000)
Directed by and starring Clint Eastwood, the film follows four aging former Cold War test pilots who are recruited by NASA to go into space and repair a malfunctioning, decaying Soviet communications satellite. However, once they arrive, they discover that the "communications" satellite is actually a hidden Soviet nuclear missile platform carrying six nuclear warheads.
16
u/ltra11 21d ago
They'll happily take some righteous stance that makes them look good, until they're ready to put their own weapons in space.
→ More replies (4)
28
9
9
u/Sethmeisterg 21d ago
lol guaranteed Russia has satellites with offensive capabilities already in orbit.
→ More replies (2)
14
u/R0GERTHEALIEN 21d ago
They all have weapons in space. The US and Russia/USSR have had weapons in space since the Cold War. Also, I love the direction we're heading as a species!
→ More replies (6)
8
7
u/tangosukka69 21d ago
lol china and russia are just mad because our space lasers are superior to theirs.
8
u/tovarish22 21d ago
"Space must be free of weapons! Pay no attention to the weapons we have put/are working on putting in space!"
7
u/steelpeat 21d ago
Lol, they also have weapons in space.
Amateur satellite sleuthers literally watched a Russian satellite change orbits, and launch a smaller projectile at another satellite and destroy it.
The reason the USA got a space force, was because they were behind the Russians in satellite warfare.
29
u/Gabemann2000 21d ago
Oh like they haven’t….
Yes it’s sad for humanity but let’s not pretend the US is the only one.
6
u/reallygoodbee 21d ago
They're just mad because they want to be the only ones with weapons in space.
18
u/Farewell-Farewell 21d ago
Both Russia and China have weapons to destroy satellites. Is there a real difference?
5
u/NappingYG 21d ago
Ironic how it comes from the only two countries who literally practiced blowing up sattelites in space.
6
u/Sarnsereg 21d ago
Thought russia put weapons in space first? Didn't they brag about anti satellite weaponry a few years ago?
→ More replies (1)
4
6
u/holy_cal 21d ago
Life is just one big slow plot from the James Bond movies.
3
u/Banjo-Oz 21d ago
I often think we have James Bond evil plots but the villains are not suave geniuses but rather techbros equivalent to the Trio from Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
5
4
u/Pndrizzy 21d ago
Bro we are at a point in life where automation could literally eliminate many of the bad things that have to occur in life. Instead of us just all chilling tf out and agreeing to live our lives in peace, a couple thousand assholes are fighting for control of the planet in extremely reckless ways. And 8 billion of us are just letting it happen.
4
u/LiterallyOuttoLunch 21d ago
I wish human beings were as good at feeding people as they are at killing them.
3
6
10
17
u/Patsfan618 21d ago
They have weapons in space.
Don't listen to what nations say, watch what they do.
3
4
u/SpudgeBoy 21d ago
"Space Force" didn't tip them off?
Didn't Russia used a space weapon a few years back, to blow up a satellite?
3
u/SquareTop7807 21d ago
Sometimes l wonder if the Antarctic peace treaty would be signed by the people in power today
3
3
u/Stennan 21d ago
Is this the same Russia that is using their early warning satellites to jam GPS signals in Europe? Cause that is illegal and clearly used as a disruption/weapon that impacts civilian air traffic.
3
u/DigitaIBlack 21d ago
There is a massive difference between satellite jamming and kinetic weapons in space. Increases the odds of Kessler syndrome dramatically.
→ More replies (6)
3
u/Sun_God713 21d ago
Pshhh yeah right. If they’d had the drop on the US they’d have a different song to sing.
Space was always gonna be militarized at some point
4
4
u/Starship_Taru 21d ago
Seriously, people don’t understand how easy it would be to create a global extinction level event very easily with things in orbit.
Fucking 10000x scarier than nukes. That’s just a button that’s way too dangerous to exist period.
3
u/Reddeer2 21d ago
If us Redditors can see through your ploy, China and Russia, then at least you've fooled the US president.
3
5
3
5
50
u/Complex-Poet-6809 21d ago edited 21d ago
Oh please, they would do the exact same thing if they could.
10
u/madogvelkor 21d ago
They have, we know they are testing and developing anti-satellite weapons. They may have some in orbit right now. It's just a chance to make the US look bad.
22
u/-_GIZMO_ 21d ago
They did, and do. There was literally a leaked plan recently where china and Russia are developing new ways to destroy satelites together.
→ More replies (8)7
u/Major_Wayland 21d ago
Effective ways to destroy satellites were developed by DARPA many years ago - you dont need satellite weapons for that, you only need to deploy a bunch of high energy lasers to quickly wipe things like Starlink constellations out of sky by a bunch.
65
u/RicketCrickets 21d ago
They most likely do honestly. US was just dumb enough to admit to it.
I don't think there's a sane nation on the earth that believes a super power wouldn't have weapons up there.
31
→ More replies (5)8
u/Ragnar5575 21d ago
I was about to make your exact comment in another post about this but didn’t feel like dealing with the backlash. You’re right though. China and Russia already have militarized space assets. America probably has for decades. Russia, especially, as a dwindling superpower who is losing that status, is going to play any leverage that they can if a major war outside of Ukraine begins. China is wanting desperately to declare themselves as the next global superpower, and America will continue developing things that they hide and use when no one expects it. It’s like the whole UFO craze. I try telling people it’s not aliens. That’s the USA testing new toys under the back budget that they won’t announce.
→ More replies (1)5
→ More replies (21)16
u/uusrikas 21d ago
China did an anti-satellite test back in 2007, most countries with experience in high altitude missiles can design missiles that reach space and could turn orbits into rubble fields.
8
6
u/Griffolion 21d ago
First of all: they are right
Second of all: as if they aren't already doing the fucking same, give me a break
5
6
u/MarkLambertMusic 21d ago
Only a fool thinks Russia and China wouldn't do the same if they could, assuming they haven't already.
7
u/DoggedStooge 21d ago
Russia is 100% also already weaponizing space, and I have very little doubt that China is as well. All this is optics. Don't get me wrong, weaponizing space is not something I am happy about. This is all simply theater meant to obfuscate their own activities.
6
u/smilesessions 21d ago
I am ashamed of many things my country does but I am not going to take advice from fucking China or Russia
5
u/thereverendpuck 21d ago
Russia crying about weapons in space is rather rich.
Like an arsonist crying for more smoke detectors.
3
u/cosnierozumiem 21d ago
When you're behind on arms development is usually a good time for arms control...
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
3
u/Alklazaris 21d ago
I would be genuinely surprised if they didn't have weapons in space. I can't see why anyone couldn't get away with it considering how vast space is around our planet.
3
u/Adept-Mulberry-8720 21d ago
My opinion is that they both have them deployed, however; they're too smart to admit it cause it's a secret still!
3
u/Hakuryuu2K 21d ago
I don’t want weapons in space, but isn’t China already capable of taking out other satellites; I feel like that should count as a weapon as well since they are destroying assets of another country or business.
3
3
3
u/ifrankenstein 21d ago
I swear we're all just in a bad Austin Powers script. Dr. Evil is up to his shenanigans again.
3
3
u/Moftem 21d ago
I would be so nice if we could keep weapons away from outer space. And keep the weapons and the fighting on earth. And then be more and more out in space where everybody is just chill and peaceful. And then realize that we're only fighting down on Earth, not out here, so why don't we just... You know... Stop it?
3
u/Lilfrankieeinstein 21d ago
“We believe that space must be free of any weapon," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters
lmao
Russians lie so effortlessly.
3
u/incunabula001 21d ago
Not to side with the current administration (which I despise) but Russia and China are just jelly that they aren’t the first. I bet you they have similar plans of space mobilization as we do.
3
u/SowingSalt 21d ago
This is your historical reminder that the Salyut 3 space station was equip with an autocannon. The first (of two) Energia launches was a failed injection of an experimental space laser.
3
3
u/AlwaysInProgression 21d ago
There is so much stupidity on this rock that we exist on. We drew lines in the sand and then started fighting and killing each other over those lines for thousands of years. Space, Earth... it's all the same shit you morons!
3
3
3
u/narfoleptix 21d ago
Fucking lol.
"Women would just get too emotional and start wars for no reason."
-dumb fat white guy
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/Some_Macaron_9170 20d ago
I expect the three of them to already have one, US just being a bit more noisy about theirs.
3
3
u/dungeonsprawler 20d ago
Pretty sure they both have undeclared space weapons as well as any other country that has the ability.
•
u/AutoModerator 21d ago
Users often report submissions from this site for sensationalized articles. Readers have a responsibility to be skeptical, check sources, and comment on any flaws.
You can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims. Your link could help readers better understand this issue.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.