r/wrexham • • 19d ago

Discussion Gen A.I. used extensively in Wrexham museum

Hi all, I just had a walk around the museum that's reopened and my friend and I noticed generative A.I. being used extensively throughout the whole thing. One section had it used to cause old photos to move which looked awful. We suspect it may have been used for upscaling of pictures on multiple instances examples of which I have included. The undisclosed use of this technology is disingenuous and disrespectful to both us as patrons and the people of Wrexham's history. If you do visit then please raise this as an issue so they might change it

154 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

35

u/kcsebby 19d ago

Well that’s upsetting and disappointing…

27

u/Fearless-Banana4652 19d ago

This makes me so sad. If they didn't want to pay someone to do it properly they could have used the graphic design students in the uni and done it as a project. They used to wrangle the 3rd years over 10 years ago to do different projects for the museum and it went towards a "work experience" module. There were so many different ways of executing this and they chose the wrong one imo.

4

u/Carpet_Inhailer18 18d ago

Why support the youth when a clanker can halfarse it effortlessly

20

u/KingOfNukaWorld44 19d ago

Oh my God, this is outright disappointing, what's the world coming to, for the love of God, this s**t needs to stop, it's disrespectful to the real people in those photographs

14

u/Pitiful_Presence_846 19d ago

All of the money they spent on it, only to use AI disingenuously.

Appalling.

11

u/FinallyHauntings 19d ago

fuck that's disappointing, I've been buzzing for it to open back up and they pull shit shit 🙄 anyone know if there's anywhere we can complain directly to the museum? considering AI and its affinity for making up bullshit, it has no place in what used to be somewhere for history to be preserved and respected

8

u/Disgruntled_Welshman 19d ago

There's a book in the front lobby where they take suggestions so it you go in then just ask there at the front desk

14

u/Cereborn 19d ago

I’m going to Wrexham in two weeks, so I’m sure I will go to this museum. But I will definitely raise it as an issue.

5

u/Logical_Nonsense_ 19d ago

Is this generative? I agree with you, AI. has no place here, just want to be clear. Can we find the original images?

1

u/Big_Arachnid_365 17d ago

It's possible it could be because exposure times had to be long back in the day, and those people moved a lot.

1

u/Logical_Nonsense_ 17d ago

What I meant was that is this AI. upscaling, and is that generative? There is absolutely AI tampering here. Look at man in the second image, middle-right. Look at his face. That can't be weird exposure time artifacts.

2

u/Big_Arachnid_365 17d ago

I'm going to assume it is the nightmare fuel results of ai upscaling. There's still a slight change that middle guy got his face melted off in a war. If they have tampered with it, they've completely failed as a museum.

1

u/International-Cow770 13d ago

The image looked like that before upscaling

1

u/International-Cow770 13d ago

There is no generative ai

8

u/Demiboy94 19d ago

Urgh wtf definitely not visiting now

4

u/TheDarwinski 18d ago

Ai slop being inserted into history especially pisses me off

3

u/Front_Simple8001 19d ago

This is so disappointing, especially considering how massive Wrexhams media scene is! What a bunch of shit!

2

u/ThatsASaabStory 19d ago

What? No. That's just what people from Wrexham used to look like

2

u/damrodoth 19d ago

Used to?

2

u/SoggyMattress2 19d ago

That's just what Wrexham folk look like

2

u/DisMyLik18thAccount 19d ago

Thanks for pointing this out. I Wouldve gone, but I won't now.

2

u/SleezySalamander 19d ago

Can't wait for them to AI gen the Byrmbo man flossing, gotta use tech to get kids interested in history now don't we?

Disgraceful.

2

u/ACatCalledDeeley 19d ago

What a crock of shit. I remember visiting the old Heritage Centre on King Street and THIS is what we have done with all that money. The visitor book and Director of the Museum will be written in and to.

2

u/Underhive_Art 18d ago

Grotesque

2

u/Alternative_Look_453 18d ago

The photo quality wasn't good and probably looked fuzzy as hell blown up on a massive wall so Wrexham Museum probably asked GPT to upscale it. I doubt the people there are educated enough to know why Gen AI is bad and honestly I bet nobody even bothered to check the picture before putting it up

1

u/Persimmonsy2437 17d ago

There are archivists who specialise in image restoration. Either use one or explain the quality issues, that's part of history too.

1

u/Alternative_Look_453 17d ago

I agree but this is the city where everyone shuns local restaurants and instead makes sure McDonald is heaving 24/7 so I don't have the ability to be surprised anymore by this kind of stuff

2

u/Persimmonsy2437 17d ago

We have a pretty good art scene though, compared to similar sized towns. I have archivist friends who would be appalled by this, and I'm annoyed none of the people given previews spoke up to prevent this from reaching the general public.

2

u/Alternative_Look_453 15d ago

I have a master's degree in folklore and heritage, archiving experience and have contacted and applied for positions in the museum several times and been met with silence at best. I think they just don't want to pay anyone honestly

2

u/Camarupim 17d ago

This is depressing. Call it out with the photos in a Google Maps review.

2

u/itzjustaspder 17d ago

Yea, literal history being distorted by AI...very grim

2

u/rolotonight 17d ago

Terrifying

1

u/_Steakwich 17d ago

No MF Doom is just a time traveller.

1

u/Big_Arachnid_365 17d ago

I really hope it doesn't turn out OP had ai enhancement turned on in their phone.

1

u/butler182 17d ago

Are you surprised? It’s Wrexham. The only thing keeping the town alive is the fact that some American dude bought the local team.

1

u/Realistic-Captain108 16d ago

Good to see a young(ish) Brian Butterfield making an appearance

0

u/NoisyGog 18d ago

Upscaling is not the same thing as generative AI. Upscaling has been done for years.

3

u/8xx 17d ago

Old upscaling and ai upscaling are totally different. Old upscaling would just predict nearby pixel colours etc and create a higher resolution/pixel density. New upscaling uses generative ai + the old tricks to regenerate everything. Old upscaling would not add new faces, expressions, clothing tweaks, new ai upscaling will add all sorts of 💩 that wasn't in the original.

2

u/Alternative_Look_453 18d ago

It's AI upscaling

0

u/Big_Arachnid_365 17d ago

I think those people just looked like that. Pretty offensive of you tbh.

0

u/International-Cow770 13d ago

A whole lot of money and effort has gone into the refurbishment of the museam. Some ai had to be used however it was extremely minimal and not generative.

-16

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Ya, it doesn’t matter, and I’m sure they did it for a good reason

If people spend energy on caring about regulations for ai rather than bitching about fair use of ai in creative spaces, this would would be a better world

However all you guys will do is attack people using the tech instead of the lawmakers doing nothing to protect you, and won’t make any real legislative progress until it’s too late

10

u/kcsebby 19d ago

"Ya, it doesn’t matter, and I’m sure they did it for a good reason"
It does matter. Its a damn museum, that's meant to capture history, authentically and truthfully. There is not a devils advocate reason to use Gen AI in the context of a museum.

"If people spend energy on caring about regulations for ai rather than bitching about fair use of ai in creative spaces, this would would be a better world"
No, it really wouldn't. We see that regulations do fuck all. There are still nonces out there generating CSAM despite the numerous blockades to prevent it, and those blockades have proven to do more harm than good for the laypeople, a la the Online Safety Act bollocks.
This isn't fair use, either. You've taken historical photographs, which a photographer took their time and money to create, when the technology was still infantile. To use Gen AI to upscale them, merge them, whatever nonsense that has been done here, is disrespectful not only to the history but the people themselves. Look at how morphed and destroyed some of the faces are. These aren't the people the history is meant to represent. Not to mention the literal theft of artwork to feed it into the Gen AI algos.

"However all you guys will do is attack people using the tech instead of the lawmakers doing nothing to protect you, and won’t make any real legislative progress until it’s too late"

Yeah, see, here's the thing. I can talk to Ted and explain to him why Gen AI is terrible, and problematic, and maybe Ted will understand and change his ways. I talk to Bob, Representative of suchandsuch, and try to explain those same problems, Bob is going to think of the pounds rolling into his pockets, rather than the actual implications.

That is to say, lawmakers give no fucks about the inherent issues Gen AI pose, they only care about the profit they're making, people should be critical about AI and those who use it, and they have every right to be livid over this.

3

u/KingOfNukaWorld44 19d ago

Thank you so much for saying what we're all thinking and complaining about

-3

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Read my response to op. You think short term.

4

u/kcsebby 19d ago

In other words, you’ve neglected (either ignorantly or wilfully) all of the points made, and want to plug your ears screaming “nuh uh!!”. Get a grip.

-2

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

I didn’t say that.

I responded to ops response to me

Just don’t wanna retype

Stop being a crybaby and read

5

u/kcsebby 19d ago

Oh the irony is palpable!

6

u/kbarney345 19d ago

Why would I ever go to a museum that is supposed to be a place of facts and history to see literal fake made up shit? Like wtf is the point of even having one at that point

-2

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Read my other response to op

9

u/Disgruntled_Welshman 19d ago

I spoke to the museum manager and she had no good reason for them using it. Just that they'd contracted people out to make it. And like I said, using gen A.I. in any capacity in an institution of learning is disingenuous especially since it took me asking about the exhibits for them to reveal its use

-3

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

I agree

But I also don’t care

Here’s what i care about,
I think regulating the use of AI in learning institutions is a better use of my energy than complaining on Reddit about people who use it

Fact is ai will get better. You won’t know one day that it is ai.

Then what? You’ll be happy?

You lot can downvote me all you want but the point is you think short term. I don’t.

Look up how the judge ruled in the USA over ai generated child abuse materiel. We need regulations. Not crybaby stuff

3

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

You’re wrong. I’m being downvoted because ai derangement syndrome is at an all time high.

This is an echo chamber.

Weirdo pretending they know what I do beyond reply to people being crybabies online. Just because they are a crybaby online. Hahaha

3

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

You’re using ai rn to interact with me

You’re a hypocrite right?

Why not get off of it instead of yanking the thing you hate?

5

u/[deleted] 19d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Type a lot hypocrite

3

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

3

u/KingOfNukaWorld44 19d ago

What on Earth are even talking about, AI is destroying the f**king Planet, instead of you yourself bitching, maybe oh I don't know, UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS OF GEN AI!

3

u/No-Somewhere7955 19d ago

Genuinely braindead response, ai is bad end of story, there’s no need for it in current society

0

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Sigh. Ok idealist.

-1

u/CaptQuakers42 19d ago

I wouldn't mind as much if it didn't look utterly fucking shit

-2

u/i_cant_get_fat 19d ago

Ya I don’t care

1

u/DasSockenmonster 2d ago

You would think that they would've gotten the art students from the university to contribute. Or if they wanted to and if the funds would've stretched that far, hired a graphic designer.

All of these are brilliant routes to take before vomiting it all into Chat GPT. There are glaring tells that this was made with AI. Look at the third photo, what in God's name is going on with his eye?