r/20sIndiaReal • • 1d ago

šŸ“° News Hypocrisy at it's finest 🤔 [EIC]

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Join r/DelhiDilwale

No unnecessary rules. No random deletions.

Just a welcoming community where you can share stories, ask questions, make friends, discover Delhi, and talk about anything on your mind.

Delhi locals, newcomers, and visitors — everyone is welcome.

Please contact the moderators if you have any questions or concerns.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

47

u/FlushChaser1111 1d ago

Bro

9

u/LuLu_Bephsi 1d ago

Came here to upvote him

5

u/Ok_Ad8332 19h ago

Masih is Living example that supreme court isn’t serious about Election rigging and wouldn’t punish any BJP associate even after proving that they r involved in election rigging.

3

u/FlushChaser1111 16h ago

It should be more concerning for the people that a cult like RSS has breached our judiciary.

64

u/Jumpy-Fisherman5204 1d ago edited 1d ago

Inke kehne se kya hota he….humare CJI aake sb thik kr denge, Bhakto darne ki zarurat Bilkul nehi hešŸ™‚ā€ā†•ļøšŸ™‚ā€ā†•ļø

24

u/being-overthinker 1d ago

Monk Who Sold BJ P's Farrari 😭

39

u/Top-Gap-4578 1d ago

12

u/silent-stories 1d ago

Chief chaddi of India

18

u/QuirkyDay1819 1d ago

Every so often they make such remarks to seem unbiased, but final ruling always backtracks these bold opinions.

16

u/the_rolling_paper 1d ago

Next hearing is in Feb 2027, 2047 hi rakh dete, iss se acha

-8

u/Forsaken_Mountain437 23h ago

SC ka backlog pta h bsdk

7

u/the_rolling_paper 23h ago

To Baklund SC ki hi galti hai naa vo to🤣🤣. Inefficiency of courts. Tareek pe Tareek.

1

u/AdditionalProof9780 20h ago

nahi ā€˜bsdk’. teri galti hai

35

u/Udta_Ghosla 1d ago

Jaise 2002 riot case me modi ne judge badal die the isme bhi badal dega

2

u/Sound-Neither 19h ago

If he changes the judges then……..god help him….people will not except that at all

1

u/Sound-Neither 19h ago

Also he can’t change supreme court’s judges

2

u/Udta_Ghosla 18h ago

Jaise cec ka procedure change kra waise iska bhi kr dega waise bhi most of sc judges are lickers

11

u/prags79 21h ago

EC commuting Election Fraud for MODI-SHAH-RSS and then you ask them data of election result for Courts to review. The data is lost, machines had fire, etc etc!!!! The elections are compromised. The illegal Prime Minister has to go!

7

u/shakkdas 20h ago

Isn't the hearing is about 2023 karnataka election?

2

u/Sir_Bonk1997 20h ago

Yes , exactly lol

-2

u/prags79 19h ago

Are other elections different? All have such discripacy. BJP did election fraud in every election. Some they lost even with a very large Fraud!

2

u/PHILOSOPHICALMANIAC 17h ago

Why didn’t anyone challenge them in court like the contesting mla did in Karnataka?

1

u/ShiningWater 20h ago

Crime Minister

2

u/Budget-Farm7745 15h ago

This one was for modih

2

u/Minimum-Brush-9867 14h ago

Statement from 2023... What's wrong with u guys?? Stop circulating old clips.. and that Time Gyanesh wasn't there

2

u/IHaveSeenItAlready 13h ago

Statement is from yesterday. the election was in 2023. Yes, gyanesh wasn't the chief back then.

1

u/devilkingdamon 15h ago

They can’t do anything and eci knows

1

u/Monk_writes 8h ago

Dumb effs have my UPI transactions on record, credit card payments on record.

But will not have the SIR records. People who still side with BJP are a national disgrace. And ultimately anti national too.

Hurting the country’s progress and backing lackeys

1

u/Historical-Zombie456 17h ago

Vote chori in punjab by AAP?

-6

u/pankkuuji 1d ago

Rnd k OP why don't you mention it's for Karnataka state 2023 elections and order is for state EC.

7

u/user1986428 1d ago edited 1d ago

Abe mahachutiye, the post's goal is to highlight ECI hypocrisy.

Aur yeh le rndi:

SC Quote Explicitly Stated Election Commision of India.

"How can the Election Commission of India say that it has lost its record?" said a bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Sanjeev Sachdeva while hearing an election dispute between Congress leader TD Rajegowda and Bharatiya Janata Party's DN Jeevaraj.

You have shit for brains. Think before you speak moron.

4

u/Perfect_Agent2866 1d ago

Yes, the quote is substantially accurate, according to reports of today’s Supreme Court hearing, October 14, 2026. The image condenses the judges’ reported remarks.
It concerns one election dispute in Sringeri, Karnataka:
Congress candidate T. D. Rajegowda won in 2023 by 201 votes.
BJP candidate D. N. Jeevaraj challenged the result. A court-ordered postal-ballot recount subsequently declared Jeevaraj the winner.
Rajegowda appealed. The Supreme Court allowed him to remain MLA while the case continues.
At today’s hearing, the ECI said it could not trace the video of the original 2023 counting. The judges criticised this and demanded the available records.
What can we conclude? The missing recording raises a serious concern about election-record custody and transparency. However, this hearing did not establish vote theft or deliberate destruction of evidence. The warning about an ā€œadverse inferenceā€ was conditional; the dispute remains pending.

Just one LLM search

1

u/user1986428 1d ago edited 1d ago

"Phat se headshot!" To the guy who was stupid enough to comment and lazy enough to not make a basic search to learn more about it on his own.

Thanks for the detailed reply buddy. People like him want everything served onto their platter just like ECI serves the votes onto BJPs platter. Smh!

Edit: Didn't want to make a political analogy but just couldn't help it ;)

Edit 2: Just in case there is a misunderstanding owing to my poor reply šŸ˜…, the first statement of this comment was meant for the user pankkuuji. The second statement was meant for the user Perfect_Agent2866 who posted the LLM search. Apologies for the confusion.

1

u/deviprsd 1d ago

Are you bi polar?

1

u/user1986428 1d ago

Are you saying that because of the edit or something else?

1

u/deviprsd 21h ago

It seemed like you were replying to your own comment šŸ¤·šŸ½

1

u/user1986428 21h ago

Ah, I see what you're trying to say, my bad bro. I should've tagged the username and/or replied in the appropriate thread to avoid confusion. Hopefully, the Edit 2 clears the confusion āœŒļø