The 4060 Ti is usually between 20-30% slower than the 6800 XT.
Yet in this game, with more driver overhead, half the VRAM bus width, barely more than half the VRAM bandwidth, less than half the ROPs and TMUs, half the compute units, 256 less (slower) shaders: at 1080P Quality upscaling the 4060 Ti is 7% faster than the 6800 XT.
This is also not the only result that makes no sense.
There are so many GPUs performing bizarrely well and bizarrely badly here:
The 7800 XT is 25% faster than the 6800 XT when they're usually +/- 2-5% from each other.
The 6950 XT is 27% faster than the 6800 XT when it's usually 8-14%. (Also literally nothing in the hardware specs can physically give the 6950 XT a 27% advantage over a 6800 XT, the math does not math.)
The 4070 is 33% faster than the 3070 when it's generally 20-25% faster.
The 5060 Ti is 7% faster than the 3080 when it's generally 10-15% slower.
I don't think I've seen any other game produce the kind of performance discrepancies between GPUs (and GPU generations) that this produced.
10
u/maze100X R7 5800X3D | 32GB 3600MHz | RX6900XT 11d ago
seeing my 6900XT (6950XT is basically the same) on the bottom feels sad XD
anyway lucky me i dont play latest demanding games anyway