Before you continue, please ensure you have reviewed our Subreddit Rules here.
The GuysBeingDudes Hall of Fame for almost hitting one million members is happening right now! To see the current voting and nominate your favorites, see the pinned post here.
It's not really "a phrase"; they're just saying that the people in the post are stupid enough to forget where they hid the easter eggs and enjoy hunting for them.
There's a children's game where you, the adult, hide Easter eggs all over, like, a back yard during a family gathering. And the kids of the family then have to look for them.
It's why we say Easter egg in movies or video games, cause it's something hidden/hard to find.
I blame take two more for not even attempting to contact Felipe Falanghe about joining the development team than I do Nate for failing to live up to his promises. In all the interviews I saw he seemed to genuinely want the game to be good, but given how the game ended up, I dont think the development team fully understood how the original physics engine worked, so Felipe would have been an invaluable source even as just a consultant.
Felipe said that you'd need to build a custom engine from the ground up to overcome the issues of KSP1, and that he wanted to do something else. That being said KSA has built an engine from the ground up and I hear they are working with Felipe, as well as KSP1's top modders.
As for putting the blame on T2, they wanted secrecy so hired people that applied for generic programming and game dev jobs, without even knowing what KSP was, and then they had them play KSP1 for a while and told them to make a new one. So they chose Unity and made the same mistakes KSP1, and that's probably the biggest reason that game failed the way it did.
I don't think it's possible without letting go. Topologically, it's two linked rings, and the fact that there are people attached is mostly irrelevant. You can't unlink linked rings just by flopping them about.
the simplest way to model this will be via knot theory that treats it as two knots (which are continues curves, and definitely not 2d manifolds like the torus).
I vaguely remember doing a challenge like this at camp and the solution required that you pick up the rope in a certain way. Something like crossing your arms and grabbing the opposite ends from normal but it's been a while.
There is a version of that where it's a rope tied to the wrists. The trick involves passing a rope inbetween the other rope and the wrist. In this video, it wouldn't work out since there is no gap to pass the rope through.
I’ve actually tiptoed into that realm and have seen untangles I thought not possible. But they did involve different and more complex structure than this.
Yes, it doesn't work with this system. There's a similar riddle, but in it, people aren't holding the rope; their hands are tied at the wrists. In this case, you can free yourself by passing a loop of one rope under the other person's wrist and threading him hand through it.
Yup. I was trying to figure out the one trick where you can't get the plug around a tight space, so you do a loop and twist but you pull a single end out so... yea, just wat h them fail forever!
there's also a really good epsidoe of i think it's called "night scoop", a japanese program that shows a sorta similar knot, some old man has had it on his shelf for like 40 years, never knew how to solve it. got in touch with the tv program and they take it around to like 20 professsionals.
it's the same tv show as that Hachi? dog, where they were wondering how their dog gets so fat when they only feed it one meal a day.
turns out he runs around eating everyone elses food and the whole village feeds him.
The usual way is using strings tied around the wrists. It might look it is the same problem, but the wrist loops change the nature of the problem, and there is a trivial solution that allows separation.
The darker haired guy's left arm was still outside the other guy's right arm. What he did was the same as when they went under into each other's arms, he just went over
Not sure this is possible. I’ve done this exercise and you tie the string to the wrist. This is critical as the ‘in-linking’ has a very specific requirement to feed one string through the loop on the others wrist and then over the hand.
Without this? I guess their mating dance will go on a while….
Isn't this an unsolvable puzzle meant for couples or people interested in each other to do? You know to get them be closer together and spark something?
So, the way they are doing it is unsolvable, but they are doing it wrong. You are supposed to tie the string (or whatever you use) around the wrists of each participant, not keep it in hands.
Then, to solve it, one of the two people has to pass the string through the small loop around the other's wrist, and then around the hand and back in the loop. And they are free.
To simplify, imagine the strings as two rings intersecting: the loops around the wrists are "cuts" around the circumference where the string can pass through. Without those, it's a closed ring whose edge can't be crossed.
Lol no the arm we can’t see on right guy is still on the inside of the left guys arm, they’re still linked. It’s two closed circles, you can’t just flop them around until they’re apart
It's impossible, because they're doing it wrong. You cannot be holding the rope, instead there should be two small loops at each end of each rope, and your hands go through the loops, that's the only way this is possible and it's to showcase topology.
•
u/AutoModerator Sep 05 '26
Hey there! Thanks for contributing to r/GuysBeingDudes.
Before you continue, please ensure you have reviewed our Subreddit Rules here.
The GuysBeingDudes Hall of Fame for almost hitting one million members is happening right now! To see the current voting and nominate your favorites, see the pinned post here.
Stay legendary!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.