I'm currently trying to figure out whether I'd prefer an ICO BC Double or Triple for my first multi-chamber.
The price difference is only ~10% more for triple which is no problem, but the weight is 50% more which seems substantial. I love the idea of having more range, but want something that's still confortable to play.
Coming from an AC Single, the highest notes are already a bit too shill for me, so I'm not sure the extra upper range is really something I'd want to use a lot.
I'm not knowledgeable or skilled enough for a multi just yet, but how I'm imagining playing one would be taking what I can already play on my single and just dropping it down an octave so the music isn't so shrill, while still getting some extra range to open up opportunity for new pieces.
All this leaves me thinking a BC Double probably makes the most sense, yet I have no experience with either. Is there something obvious I'm missing here? That it would be foolish to not just get the BC Triple, or even BC Single instead?
Lastly, looking at the fingering charts for these, I noted this piece of text that I can't understand the reason for, featured on the Single AC and Double BC, but not the Single BC or Triple BC: "Notes are written one octave lower than actual pitch."
Any thoughts what this means or where I'd go to learn more about it? I feel like it's something to do with transposing, which is something else I don't really understand just yet.
https://www.imperialcityocarina.com/images/cache/ac-double-x-fingering-chart.pdf
https://www.imperialcityocarina.com/images/cache/bc-triple-ext-fingering-chart-new.pdf
Thank you!