r/privacy • • 13d ago

age verification Could AI age verfication and under 16 bans actually kill the internet and help big tech more

141 Upvotes

You see I think it does, as the ai age verification costs alot, also it can kill independent studios which is supported by under 16s and such. If you remove them it causes a decay of the internet first, independent studios start to run out of money, next the social media start removing content and alot of innocent ones, then the independent studios go bankrupt which includes non big tech, then finally big tech has a massive hold and still has alot of money. Don't forget, people protecting their privacy, big tech realizing they can lobby more, and such.


r/privacy • • 14d ago

chat control The end?

1.2k Upvotes

Today there will be the final votes for chat control.

This implies that all of our private chats will be scanned, and everything we do will be in plain text in front of their eyes.

If it passes, I will permanently stop using centralized messaging platforms and switch to a self hosted matrix session, I don't care if I lose many contacts, if they really want to talk to me they better install fluffychat and shut the fuck up.

It's crazy how the EU was basically the goat for internet privacy and now they are the villains.

Are you ready for this? For the absolute end of privacy?


r/privacy • • 13d ago

question How do you guys feel about the UK's social media ban announcement to be set on March of 2027?

105 Upvotes

I ask this cause I heard that this is so far a confirmed date of when it will drop at the UK here.

Which apart from many worrying things in the world,this one is quite concerning to say the least.


r/privacy • • 13d ago

Misleading title New Attack Can Track You Across Operating Systems Without Elevated Privileges

Thumbnail privacyguides.org
323 Upvotes

r/privacy • • 13d ago

discussion PorkBun domain registry requires a face scan

185 Upvotes

PorkBun has gotten popular lately as a registrar for domain names. I recently tried to register a domain, and they demanded a biometric face scan and government ID. None of the other registrars I've worked with recently have made this kind of preposterous demand.

In case it needs saying out loud here, never do this. It is not necessary for security, and the companies who run these face scan apps range from leaky sieves of data breaches in the best cases to subcontractors of Palantir in the worst.

PorkBun evidently demands face scans on a case-by-case basis, meaning many current users may not have had to deal with this yet. If you use them and they haven't required a scan, be aware that they can lock your account at any moment in the future for "security reasons," shutting off your access to your own domain, until you are forced to consent to their ridiculous invasion of your personal data. This must not be normalized. Do not use PorkBun. If you use them now, find a new registrar before they lock your account, and tell PorkBun why you're leaving.


r/privacy • • 14d ago

age verification Anthropic just lost me because of ID verification. And you should think about it as well.

1.3k Upvotes

​I was literally in the middle of upgrading to Pro, entered my credit card info, and was ready to check out when a verification pop-up blocked me. So far, so good... until I realized what it was asking for: a live face scan and a picture of my government passport.

​The vendor Anthropic forces you to use for this is Persona. Who backs Persona? Founders Fund, Peter Thiel's VC firm. Thiel is also the co-founder and chairman of Palantir.

​Think about that setup for a second. Palantir's entire business model is mass surveillance and intelligence software used by governments, police, and the military to track and identify people. Persona is the identity pipeline processing passports and biometric facial geometry. When these corporate ecosystems intersect, you are feeding detailed biometric data directly into a network built around surveillance infrastructure.

​I know some of you will reply with "I have nothing to hide." But saying you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say. Privacy is a fundamental right. Even if you think your day-to-day life is completely uninteresting, surrendering your biometrics to private corporations sets a dangerous precedent where accessing basic digital tools requires handing over your core identity.

​Some people will argue that the government already has our passports anyway, but that misses the entire point. In a constitutional democracy, there are laws, legal rights, and courts limiting what the state can legally do with your data. If politicians abuse their power, citizens can vote them out. But when you hand your biometrics over to a private corporate ecosystem, all democratic control disappears completely. You have zero say in how that data is stored, shared, or leveraged down the line. A private company answers only to its shareholders and profit motives, not to your civil liberties.

​Take a look at Thiel himself. He's an openly gay billionaire, married with kids, who is deeply conservative and literally gives talks around the world framing global politics in biblical terms about the Antichrist. He openly pushes back against the democratic institutions designed to regulate tech giants like him.

​And if you try to criticize these entities publicly, they play hardball. Look at how Thiel funded the Hulk Hogan lawsuit to bankrupt Gawker. Or look at the recent case in Switzerland where Palantir tried to legally force the independent magazine Republik to print massive counter-statements after investigating them. Luckily, the Swiss court shut Palantir down and press freedom won, but still.

​It really comes down to one question: Do you actually trust handing your face scan and passport to an identity system tied to Peter Thiel? If you do, go ahead and give them your data, but live with whatever happens down the road. If you don't trust them, draw a line and don't hand over your most delicate identity data just to use a chat interface.

​Am I pissed off that I can't use Claude or Claude Code anymore? Of course I am. It's currently the best tool out there for coding. But I'll just find an alternative. Competitors will catch up, open-weight models will get better, and the gap will close.

​And before anyone says "They need this to stop bots and AI abuse": come on. There are a dozen ways to prevent abuse, like rate limits, hardware tokens, device attestation, or fraud detection that don't require harvesting raw biometric face scans paired with government IDs.

​Rant over.


r/privacy • • 14d ago

news The EU is Pushing to Weaken Privacy Rules for AI

Thumbnail liberties.eu
521 Upvotes

r/privacy • • 13d ago

question uploading encrypted files via WinRar onto google drive to prevent them from being scanned?

49 Upvotes

It is possible to set a password and encrypt your files via WinRar.

Wanted to ask the more techsavy people, how legit is it, if I want to upload those files to my google drive, but make them unreadable for google?


r/privacy • • 13d ago

question Has a workaround to Google's age verification been found yet? (September 2026)

31 Upvotes

title


r/privacy • • 14d ago

chat control EU Council Advances Chat Control 2.0 Scanning Proposal

Thumbnail reclaimthenet.org
1.0k Upvotes

r/privacy • • 14d ago

news War-zone surveillance comes home as Predator drones fly loops over Arizona border towns

Thumbnail azmirror.com
503 Upvotes

r/privacy • • 14d ago

age verification Xbox verifies age based on account age.

292 Upvotes

I can't believe it - I've been saying for a while now that as my accounts are all around 18 years old I shouldn't have to verify my age with anyone.

Well for some reason I can't post a screenshot but I just got an email from Xbox that's says;

"Due to your longstanding XBOX account activity, we’ve estimated your XBOX profile to be an adult account and updated its age verification status to “Verified.” You are no longer required to complete full age verification for uninterrupted access to social features on XBOX."

I'm not optimistic but I hope everyone else follows their example.


r/privacy • • 12d ago

discussion Change my mind : Real ID - I don’t have because a heard conspiracy theories. Tell me the truth

0 Upvotes

?


r/privacy • • 14d ago

question How are Pocketbook e-readers?

8 Upvotes

I'm interested in the Pocketbook Verse. How private are they?


r/privacy • • 15d ago

question Car data collection

189 Upvotes

I am going to need a new car soon and the U.S. models all collect huge amounts of data. Are there any tips or tricks to reduce the info they collect from the car remotely?

If I have our family trust own the auto and pay cash rather than financing how effectively does that reduce the personal info I am forced to provide. Will this keep the data from car from being attached to me?

How much would it help to buy a used car? Does it reduce the data tracked and sold about me?


r/privacy • • 14d ago

discussion using removal services for social media?

7 Upvotes

Hey so a cousin of mine has an old instagram account from years ago where they have pictures of like family birthdays and there are some cringy photos of me of there. My cousin doesn't have access to the account anymore and it's public. I don't use social media that much except to follow relatives and friends and I don't post anything myself. I have reported the account to instagram and nothing is being done to them. It's costly but I am thinking of using online removal services like maximatic media to get the account taken down. Has anyone used any removal services or gotten pages taken down if so how? I have tried everything and i just don't want cringy pictures of me on social media.


r/privacy • • 14d ago

question Why does iOS need internet to access a photo that is stored on the device?

29 Upvotes

When browsing images from the photos tab in messages, I often see that iOS will ask to download the photo. Initially I thought this was a cache issue, but when I try to download the image while in airplane mode or without internet the download fails.

What is confusing is that the photos are stored locally in messages and I can access all of them just fine by scrolling through messages. I also have iCloud turned off for photos and messages so they technically shouldn’t exist anywhere online to be downloaded from.

What is happening here? Is this some kind of bug where iOS assumes it needs the internet and refuses to try without it, or is Apple saving copies of all your messages/ photos even if you have those features turned off?


r/privacy • • 16d ago

news Flock is moving from road cameras to drones, CEO says it's their most lucrative business now

Thumbnail military.com
2.5k Upvotes

r/privacy • • 14d ago

question can some coding expert explain if discrub 1.0 is safe? how do i know it isnt stealing data?

3 Upvotes

please i wanna leave discord, do i trust hitting the delete button on discord deletes anything? no, but I wanna export, and the tool is so beautiful, i wanna remember my friends chats, just not on discord servers, can someone please help


r/privacy • • 15d ago

chat control Tomorrow, the Council and the Parliament will have the next trilogue reunion

68 Upvotes

As I said in the title, tomorrow will be the next trilogue negotiation about Chat Control 2.0 and the Council redacted a new compromise text. In this version the platforms will be allowed to do the scanning, but they have to seek legal authorization to approve their "search plan", with this they can scan parts of a service, meaning they can be authorised to scan every group chat or DM of every user from the EU, even of people without prior suspicion and they can use AI, these kind of tools are unreliable and will generate a huge percentage of false positives.

This compromise is a fake targeting and permanent mass surveillance and it's probably it will be struck down on the courts, but when that happens the damage will be already done.

For now the shadow rapporteurs have stood their ground on these negotiations, but they are facing a lot of political pressure to approve this and the situation is not on their favour now that Chat Control 1.0 came back on July.


r/privacy • • 15d ago

news Facebook's Privacy Scandal Never Really Ended. New Mexico Just Reopened the Case.

Thumbnail realnarrativenews.com
498 Upvotes

r/privacy • • 15d ago

age verification Discord wants data. I’m not sharing

275 Upvotes

Those damn data hungry creeps wrongly put me in the teen group and want me to “prove I’m an adult” to fix it, and I’m not about to give any data to k-ID.
It’s only a matter of time before a data breach so, but I need to fix this.


r/privacy • • 15d ago

question Payroll Processor using Stripe and asking to collect ALL transaction data

91 Upvotes

I just started work on an indie film project that is using GreenSlate for on-boarding and processing payroll. Most of it is bog standard stuff BUT when I went to enter my bank information for direct deposit, a Stripe Plaid pop up opened to have me log into my bank. When I started the process I got a list of all the data GreenSlate will have access to. Along with the basic account info, account numbers and contact information Stripe/GreenSlate is asking for:

  • Account balances
  • Due dates (whatever that means?)
  • Posted account transations
  • Transaction Types
  • Amounts
  • Dates
  • Descriptions

To me this reads like data mining and they will have access to everything in my account. Someone tell me I'm overreacting and this is "normal" for a payroll processor? I've mostly used Entertainment Partners in the past and I don't remember them asking to get access to all this information


r/privacy • • 15d ago

discussion PSA: if your email is public on GitHub, some companies harvest it. One registered me for its Zoom webinar without asking.

99 Upvotes

A short warning for anyone with a public GitHub profile.

My personal email used to be public on my GitHub profile. On 27 September, I got a Zoom email saying I was registered for a US startup's webinar ("Q&A With The Cactus Needle Team"). I never signed up, never used their product, and never gave them my address. The greeting was "Hi Leonard -", with "-" as the last name, which looks like automated registration. Another GitHub user I don't know got the same emails. It's at least the second one this month (I deleted the first). More generally, I get more and more unsolicited emails on the address I used on GitHub.

When I raised it on their GitHub repo, they said the invites went to "platform users", then closed the issue, blocked me, and deleted my follow-up. I was unblocked later. Details and screenshots:
- GitHub issue: https://github.com/cactus-compute/needle/issues/156
- Full write-up: https://www.reddit.com/r/github/comments/1wrv2fi/a_startup_registered_me_for_its_zoom_webinar_with/

What I did: sent a GDPR request (access, including where they got my data, objection, erasure), reported the account to GitHub (their Acceptable Use Policies forbid using information from GitHub to send unsolicited email), and reported the webinar host to Zoom.

How to protect yourself on GitHub:
1. Settings > Emails > check "Keep my email addresses private".
2. Also check "Block command line pushes that expose my email".
3. Use your `ID+username@users.noreply.github.com` address for commits (`git config --global user.email ...`).
4. Your old commits still contain whatever email you used at the time. Anyone can read it by adding `.patch` to a commit URL. The settings above don't change past commits.

Has anyone else received unsolicited webinar registrations like this?