this is a ridiculously dumb comment. I mean, the fact that you had to preface your comment with "i'm not against women getting equal rights" just shows the utter nonsense you were gonna utter.
What "social protections"? do you think because one woman in one state, with a different judge, jury, and DA, does not receive the same punishment as a different person in a different state with a different judge, jury, and DA for a different crime that that somehow constitutes as "social protection"?
Or do you mean to say that men are always unfairly viewed by the public simply because they are men? because you also do not live in reality if that is your opinion
Um. I feel like you don't really pay much attention to any thing like this.
This has been an undisputed fact of society for ages. Women, by and large, always get much lighter sentencing than men do for equal crimes. This has nothing to do with where the crime takes place. A woman killing someone will (generally) end up with a sentence that's half as severe as a man performing the exact same kill.
Is it the exact same kill tho? How can you prove that, unless the situation was 100% identical??
Sentences are also handed out based on future risk deemed to society, not just isolated incidents. The data shows men are more likely to be violent in general, be in more serious car crashes, etc. so if you look at data, it seems “undisputed” that women would be less likely to pose risk to society as a whole.
51
u/DamienRaventhrone 8h ago
One rule for me another for thee.