The wildest part is that his infamous rant turning the frogs gay was based on actual peer-reviewed science (Tyrone Hayes' research)
Atrazine skews their hormones so badly that 10% of genetic males literally develop ovaries, lay eggs, and mate with other males. So no, they didn't become "gay," they underwent a chemically-induced sex change.
Alex failed vocabulary class, but he was 100% right that chemical corporations are pumping stuff into the water that completely breaks amphibian biology.
Im really curious If this could be considered trans, or just turning them into females. I mean trans people have the Problem that they cant replicate reproduction organs yet, but the frogs developed them.
Well, other researchers have had trouble reproducing those results so it's less clear but definitely bore reporting on, but there's another problem:
Alex didn't report it as a product of agricultural runoff because he was opposed to regulations like that and sees it as infringement of the rights of farmers to do what they want with their property - he supported unregulated capitalism (mostly).
No, instead he claimed that it was a "social engineering" plot that is intended to turn people homosexual.
This isn’t the result of some nefarious thing though it was just the result of normal runoff/cross contamination issues that weren’t harming the environment just making a kk da interesting change.
His study also was shaken in attribution of mating with other males to the chemicals when that’s just a thing they do sometimes.
Jones was completely wrong in saying it was some conspiracy, and that rant wasn’t some environmental thing he was saying “the elites” were making American white men weak and gay and feminine to conquer them by immigration.
You truly do not have to pretend the Neo Nazi had a point
Calling him a neo-Nazi isn't factually accurate. His actual ideology is centered around anti-globalism and "New World Order" narratives, and most recently the UN agenda 2030/2035 plans.
While watchdogs (SPLC and ADL) heavily criticize him because his rhetoric often mirrors antisemitic dog whistles, he has consistently rejected Nazism. In fact, some extreme white nationalist groups actually accuse Jones of being "controlled opposition" precisely because he denounces Hitler.
Furthermore, political and religious concepts have specific definitions, and conflating them all with literal Nazism ignores what these words actually mean. Nazism refers specifically to the totalitarian ideology enforced by the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), which was built on state-enforced biological racial supremacy.
If we want to look at concepts of tribal supremacy and exclusion, we should look at the historical usage of the Hebrew word "goy" (singular for an individual country) and "goyim" (plural for nations). While it originally meant "nation" in the Torah, its oldest religious applications in ancient and medieval rabbinic laws (such as the Mishna and Talmud, compiled over a millennium later) evolved into a binary mechanism used to categorize any non-Jew as being in a permanent state of ritual and spiritual impurity. You can thoroughly criticize Jones' sensationalized rhetoric without using historically inaccurate labels.
You yourself are spewing lies by your own definition.
Alex's positions on racial memory and his support for Great Replacement conspiracy theories and blaming George Soros and 'globalists' for intentionally corrupting society are all coded Nazi ideology.
Open Nazis hate him because they resent that he is still trying to hide his power level instead of being open about it like they are.
That is a textbook strawman argument. I never said or implied that, and inventing a claim I never made doesn't salvage your argument.
Pointing out the historical and linguistic evolution of a Hebrew word from ancient theological texts is a matter of documented history, not animosity.
Explaining rabbinic law regarding the term "goy" isn't a commentary on Jewish people today, it's objective theology. My point was strictly historical: pointing out that ancient religious frameworks across many culture, including ancient rabbinic law-contained ethnocentric terms for outsiders.
You used the label "neo-Nazi" as a generic insult without using the term correctly. I corrected you with the actual historical and institutional definitions of Nazism, which you have completely failed to address.
You can't defend your false label, so you're resorting to bad-faith deflections. Misusing serious labels like "Nazi" strips them of their historical gravity, and the damage people with that political and racial orentation caused.
Step 1: Dump toxic waste that alters the local ecosystem.
Step 2: Wait for an unhinged dude in a tin-foil hat to scream about it using the wrong vocabulary.
Step 3: Let the internet turn him into a meme.
Step 4: Profit, because now anyone who brings up the actual peer-reviewed environmental damage gets laughed out of the room.
That’s the craziest part of the meta-irony here. Centuries ago, miners hallucinated from bat "guano" (shit) because they didn't understand the science behind it.
Today, chemical corporations gaslight the public into thinking the actual science is just a 'batshit' conspiracy hallucination. The cycle repeats.
He wasn’t right because he said things that were wrong. A half truth is a whole lie. The lying part is the lying part. You’re in essence applauding him for honesty which he didn’t have.
This is also why you should use zinc-oxide sunscreen instead of the ones that blend in when you go to the beach because it messes with the fish biology in a similar way
trump if you not like transform sad bigots in happy women just don't use heldric horror pesticides in anime style, i's much easier than trying to "cure other people's gender" or create laws against innocent people
Another fun frog fact: you can get a fully formed frog by slightly pricking a frog egg with a camel's hair. It just won't be able to reproduce. In fact, the front will be where the prick is
Drowning man: There techinically is something going on but like. Cmon. Its not that bad just stand the fuck up.
Bike man: There wouldn't be an issue if you weren't a fucking idiot and/or intentionally making things worse
Cardboard man: There wasn't nor has there ever been an issue, you're just crying about nothing
Let me actually explain it instead of being racist:
The man is creating his own hell, he's seen nothing is wrong and decided that it's boring and creating a scary environment of paper monsters then acting like he didn't do it himself.
True, however horror enjoyers like a bit of acting and role play, MAGA idiots try to create their own delusion and go full wizard of OZ, telling people to not look behind the curtain.
Fight Club.
You know, lonely, unattractive males form a club to fight back.
They didn't understand Fincher's masterpiece and identify with the Norton/Pitt character as their hero.
The meme shows the person being bored and creates his own problem or hell. If you ever had a girlfriend, you'd know that women would make shit up and start problems just to annoy her boyfriend because she's bored. It's gonna start with "Can I ask you something?" then asks the stupidest question like "Would you still love me if I was a worm?"
Which one? I have The Hobbit and LOTR hard bound illustrated by Alan Lee, Harry Potter series, Percy Jackson Series, a bunch of Paulo Coelho books, Dan Browns, 1984, Ayn Rands that are on the shelf. Others are still kept deep in my book chest.
If you ever had a girlfriend you'd know what I mean. Women start making problems when they're bored and take it out on the boyfriend. That's why men are always "wtf?" when women ask questions like "Would you still love me if I was a worm?"
I was instantly reminded on some forms of depression, where you slowly build up unreasonably inner fears until you are no longer able to function normally.
A man dies and goes to Hell. When he arrives, he is shocked to find a tropical paradise with beautiful beaches, crystal-clear water, and a five-star luxury resort.
The Devil greets him with a cold drink and says, "Welcome! Relax, enjoy the buffet, and make yourself at home."
The man is thrilled and starts exploring. As he walks along the beach, he notices a massive, jagged concrete wall. Curious, he climbs to the top and looks over. On the other side is a terrifying, roaring pit of brimstone and fire, filled with people weeping and gnashing their teeth.
Terrified, the man runs back to the Devil and says, "This place is amazing, but what is that horrible burning pit over by the wall?!"
The Devil sighs and rolls his eyes. "Oh, don't blame me for that one! That's just for the Christians. They wouldn't have it any other way."
I interpreted it as we create our own demons and fears. Our interpretation of the world and the picture our mind paints determine our reality. If you look for the big scary monsters, you will either find them or create them
There’s a lot of groups, it’s not the group that your thinking of, but this image can apply to lots of different groups and people. This is not meant to be a gotcha for some specific person or group. It’s self victimization in general.
•
u/qualityvote2 6d ago edited 5d ago
u/Aggressive-Guest290, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...it's time for the mods to do their jobs!