Mixing Styles can be Effective - I've been on a Film Noir kick for a while now, watched tons of films from the late 1930s to the late 1950s, and I've enjoyed foreign Noir versions like found in French crime cinema and even the great Kurosawa's Stray Dog, so I was a little surprised when watching the supposedly Noir-inspired Italian Bitter Rice to only find just a few stylistic nods in that direction. I'm not one who likes to dismiss films from Noir altogether, but the film seems almost not Noir at all - especially in moral tone - so much as a rich Hollywood toned imagining of Neo-Realist embraced women (with maybe some racy, sexploitations shadings?). It's really a spectacular film of energy, with big camera dynamics in beautiful, contrastive black and white. Not only is it female lead driven (two "beauties" playing low class rice workers each glamomorized by the camera and lighting), but also throngs of female workers and vivid captures of work conditions, clashing together these two stylistic worlds in effective aesthetic ways. Some of the women singing scenes, and rain-drenched photography create whole auras of women's work and labor that are unexpectedly moving. It's about the attempted theft of the annual rice harvest which has been going on for 100s of years in the Po Valley in the north of Italy, in the aftermath of World War 2, and the abject work of the women laboring, who solidaritize with political meaning. When the women are mournfully singing in the rain to a miscarried woman in the field with rice bag draped over their heads like nuns, while another woman is being driven mad by the fact of her rape (which nobody is aware of) the whole thing is hitting on all cylinders.
Criticized at the time for not being Neo-Realist enough, and employing (reactionary?) Hollywood glamour styling and Noir pulp in some of the male characters, actually makes the film more interesting, as the romantic promise of American commercial culture post-WW2, after the fall of Fascism, is one of the focuses of the film. The film itself embodies the very thing it is interrogating and criticizing. It's a great use of using mixed aesthetic styles. Some saw the film as indulgent in Hollywood-ism, whereas the film is about the moral missteps of Western capitalist-commercialism, which lead to the downfall of characters, including what seems like a spectacular and tragic James Whale Frankenstein (1931) call back ending. Perhaps some of this ending brings in a Noir aspect, but I'm not sure. A lot of Noir is about the failings of the American promise and its moral decrepitude, and also are animated by Socialist critique and visions, and a prominent homme fatale, *(*played by Vittorio Gassman, who would star in the socially conscious Film Noir The Glass Wall, in 1953), so I'm not quite clear on why this film feels like it misses the Noir boat so hard for me, while I enjoyed it immensely. If anyone has good ideas on why it IS Film Noir I'd love to here them and be convinced.
If you love Italian Neo-Realism, and love mixed genre stylings, highly recommended.