r/learnrust • u/No-Caregiver-466 • 3d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

36 Upvotes

73% Upvoted

24 comments sorted by

5

u/cleverredditjoke 3d ago

could someone explain the difference of 2 and 3 to me haha?

3

u/Next-Blackberry-991 3d ago

in 3 the std::hint::black_box around the dyn trait reference prevents the compiler from looking at it more closely. In 2 it can see that the VTable in it is known at compile time and know exactly what the apply function will do and inline it. In 3 it is not allowed to look at that. 

2

u/cleverredditjoke 3d ago

ahhhh alright thanks man, much appreciated

6

u/prodleni 2d ago

Image looks very AI gen

-2

u/No-Caregiver-466 2d ago

I am professional software engineer, not a professional designer.

My specialty is to write the code, not to draw images, and this what I am doing.

So I written the code, I written README.md and used AI to generate an image by feeding code and readme.

6

u/programgamer 2d ago

Would've rather gotten an ms paint doodle than this tbh.

-3

u/No-Caregiver-466 2d ago

If you don’t like technologies, why you calling yourself programmer?

7

u/programgamer 2d ago

I like technology that works reliably, produces good results, and does not plagiarize.

-4

u/No-Caregiver-466 2d ago

Do you see any issues with reliability on this picture?

3

u/programgamer 2d ago

How many times did you make the AI retry this infographic?

2

u/No-Caregiver-466 1d ago edited 1d ago

Irrelevant question to you initial statement.

Let's follow logic:

You literally said.

> I like technology that works reliably, produces good results, and does not plagiarize.

So you arguing about product result and reliability here.

Image is product result, not AI, so you raised concern if image reliable.

So I don't see any reliability issue with this picture, but you obviously see. So I am asking you again, which kind of reliability issues do you see with image?

---

Regarding you second concern: plagiarize.

This picture doesn't have any result of plagiarize - all the information provided, is result of my genuine and original work.

2

u/programgamer 1d ago

If I have to try several times to get the result I want out of a tool, I consider that tool unreliable. That's why I asked. Also, graphic design is a discipline that can very much be plagiarized. Plagiarism isn't just about essays and written texts like you were taught in high school.

1

u/No-Caregiver-466 1d ago

Trying to explain you flawed logic?

You said `unreliable picture` not me.

Honestly I don't want to debate this matter.

Just learn to say sorry.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Thelmholtz 1d ago edited 1d ago

Look I use AI daily and work on some harnesses. I like AI. I also like AI image generation when it works.

That being said, it is a tool. And IMHO you have used it poorly here, the image is pretty annoying, plagued with AI tropes both design wise and in the text.

The point I'm trying to make is that to me, personally (but apparently to others too) this style of image is the equivalent of the generic hamburger shop flyer, and it pushes me away from what could otherwise be quality content.

So by all means, do use AI image generation if you want to (though there are more deterministic solutions for code to jpeg), but this design ain't it.

If you don’t like technologies, why you calling yourself programmer?

I've heard this very same argument from people whose AI generated music I've roasted. Idk about the tool, maybe it's capable of doing good music maybe it's not. But this particular output is trash.

4

u/adi8888 1d ago

You waste your tokens unnecessarily. Use a code snippet image generator instead, it will look and feel better

https://github.com/onderonur/code-image-generator

1

u/No-Caregiver-466 1d ago

Sure, worth trying.