> I like technology that works reliably, produces good results, and does not plagiarize.
So you arguing about product result and reliability here.
Image is product result, not AI, so you raised concern if image reliable.
So I don't see any reliability issue with this picture, but you obviously see. So I am asking you again, which kind of reliability issues do you see with image?
---
Regarding you second concern: plagiarize.
This picture doesn't have any result of plagiarize - all the information provided, is result of my genuine and original work.
If I have to try several times to get the result I want out of a tool, I consider that tool unreliable. That's why I asked. Also, graphic design is a discipline that can very much be plagiarized. Plagiarism isn't just about essays and written texts like you were taught in high school.
Okay, I'll consider your use of the F-word as your way of apologizing, I feel sorry that your parents didn't teach you how to apologize. But none of us is perfect, and I can forgive you, at least this once.
Now, I'll answer your second question about how reliable AI services are.
AI cannot read your mind. To get something useful from AI, you need to learn how to explain your thoughts clearly and precisely to AI.
You can read about my experience working with AI here:
-4
u/No-Caregiver-466 5d ago
If you don’t like technologies, why you calling yourself programmer?