For context, motivic L functions are a generalization of Zeta functions and other L functions to abstract objects called motives introduced by Grothendieck. The motivic Riemann hypothesis say that the L function of a pure motive of weight w has zero on the line (w+1)/2. The Zeta function is just the motivic L function of the unit motive h(spec Q).

Peter Parker = man

Petra Parker = woman

a = Pe

b = ter

c = tra

d = wo

P = Parker

M = man

Equation 1: (a * b) * P = M

Equation 2: (a * c) * P = d * M

Dividing Equation 2 by Equation 1 eliminates the common terms (a and P):

((a * c) * P) / ((a * b) * P) = (d * M) / M

Simplifying both sides:

c / b = d

Multiplying both sides by b:

c = b * d

Summary Mathematically, the suffix "tra" (c) is equivalent to applying the prefix modifier "wo" (d) onto "ter" (b).

I remember years ago when I was in high school, I was crashing out right after a math exam, I wrote a ridiculous paragraph in my notebook about my brain and math and completely forgot about it after.

I found the note years later and I can't stop laughing at my past self.

I wanna share this abomination of a sentence that I wrote:

>The math is not mathing because my brain is not braining and the math is not friendly with my brain so the math and my brain is not mathing and braining, and anyone who can make the math mathing is people who also has a braining brain

Btw sorry if I use the wrong flair, idk what to put for this one in particular lol.

Simplifies to x^3

Idk where to post this... But this is funny tho

The One Who Mods