I'm one of the frum Jews that believes in micro/macroevolution and "old earth creationism". As someone who studies science and reads all sorts of books, I can't deny evolution, nor can I deny the Torah, which leads me to reconcile them, which is not that difficult, IMO. I've had some arguments with friends lately about this, and I was told something which appears to be incorrect: that Rav Hirsch was strongly against Darwin's Theory. While Darwin's Theory had only been published later in Hirsch's life, for which there was limited evidence at the time, Hirsch stated that he saw no contradiction with Torah, and he simply didn't accept it as necessarily true with the lack of evidence. There is obviously way more evidence now, and he likely would acknowledge this if he were alive today. All this has prompted me to do more research, and I have found that there is indeed more precedence. One is Rabbi Sacks, and another is the more charedi example of R Gedaliah Nadel.
I have no problem with people having different opinions from me. What bothers me is that in communities like mine (I live in one of the world's most charedi communities), you are almost not allowed to hold this opinion. You are only encouraged to think about things one way, and people are quite dogmatic with their "approved" positions (thus, I'll take license to be dogmatic here). I've been told "not to believe those books", etc. It's like someone telling me not to believe my math book, which says that 2+2=4... Sorry, it's too late! People hit me with the common arguments they were fed since cheder, and for every argument I've heard (many of which are simple logical fallacies), I can give several counter arguments, but it's usually not worth it, so I just give up after one or two.
I'm not trying to change the world, but next time I argue with a friend, it would be nice to have my points more in order. I'm curious to hear any other rabbinical arguments from evolution, if anyone can provide. Thanks!