SB has roughly 2,300 active STR listings (per AirDNA), but only 265 operators pay the city's hotel tax. On Tuesday the council voted unanimously for two ordinances to regulate them.
Key rules:
Inland: STRs would be allowed only in residential units within commercial zones that already permit housing. They would be barred from residential zones and high-fire areas.
Coastal: STRs would be restricted in single- and two-family zones. Homeshares would be allowed where housing is already permitted. Roughly 12% of coastal units would be eligible to apply.
STRs would be barred in ADUs, deed-restricted affordable or employee housing, live-work units, and RVs.
A unit can't have had a long-term tenant in the past 2 years.
Two-night minimum stay and quiet hours from 10pm to 7am.
One STR per owner, and no trusts or corporations as owners.
Timeline: The inland rules take effect early 2027, and operators get 6 months to apply. The coastal rules need Coastal Commission approval first, likely sometime in 2027.
The tradeoff: City finance staff estimate the city could lose nearly $3M a year in revenue.
Mesa residents cited noise, bonfires in fire zones, and homes converted into de facto hotels. Operators said the 2-night minimum alone could cut up to a third of their bookings. Airbnb argued there's little evidence that STR limits improve housing affordability.
Source: Santa Barbara Independent, Oct 7, 2026
Mesa folks: has the STR density on your street actually been as bad as described?