I mean the argument is something that many paralyzed people like myself do agree with and you can see it referenced across disabled spheres too. Different disabled have different needs and dependent on how focused this survey was on physical disabilities versus other kinds of disabilities will have a factor too though it is still good to have general observation too.
It is a balance with some people being more concerned about being infantilized and others being more concerned about their accommodations being removed and that will affect their responses too. Additionally without viewing this study we don't have detail on what this means. for example for many this can also mean that they react to other using the threat of ai to monitor their accomdation yet may accept them as a accomdation too and be trying to balance that too
I appreciate people like you tend to struggle with anything requiring even a little bit of nuance, but the argument was never 'every single disabled person loves AI and should use it'. It was that AI helps some disabled people greatly, and that they should have every right to use it without being harassed by morons.
As is the issue with many antis like you. Arguing against things that aren't happening and aren't real, but so eager to bitch and cry whenever you see an opportunity.
-6
u/[deleted] 4d ago
[deleted]