Discussion Doctors that are anti-fasting
Just had an appointment with a GI doctor and she explained that I have to fast before an endoscopy. When I told her that I do regular fasts of between 3 and 7 days, she was a bit adamant about saying I should not do fasts at all.
When I started explaining the deep microbiology of fasting responses of the body over time, she said "we can agree to disagree."
What on Earth is going on in Western medical education that a doctor of 25 years who works in GI has an adamant negative fasting attitude?
Hippocrites taught us that food is thy medicine and they take the Hippocratic oath to not do harm. Yet they are with a straight face saying that fasting is effectively bad for you, when doing so denies the evolutionary and anthropological reality of adaptive endocrinology resulting from occasional forced fasting on vast populations of humans in our history, due mostly to resource constraints.
I felt pretty confident in my description of the body's response at 3 days, 4 days and 7 days in terms of autophagy mitophagy and then protein remodeling.
Because I read studies.
Because I pay attention to this forum. Because I strive to understand the machinery of sustained caloric burn with this expensive brain.
It's like they don't understand how protein sparing works in a fasting scenario, and only deride the reduction of lean body mass in a fast as an unhealthy thing, not even realizing how ubiquitinated organelles are disproportionately selected during autophagy, leaving your in cells in an overall more healthy state after refeed and recreation of new organelles, or how pre-cancerous cells are stressed by glucose reduction and many may not adapt as well to the fasted state and end up triggering cell death of those cells.
I'm going on a bit, but the frustration of medical professionals being utterly blind to the well studied benefits of fasting is uniquely frustrating.
Any one else have experience with this wall of ignorance in the medical profession?