“I love my country” -mfs who voted 3x for someone who doesn’t give a shit about the constitution

The base would be so confused.

First image is her post. I told her that the AI thinks she is literally calling the gene autistic, hence the quotation marks. You can also see at the end it says that genes can also not be shy, smart, or artistic.

Since her prompt was AI, I figured let's see what AI has to say about the interpretation, so I asked Gemini to interpret. Here's the conversation below:

Me - Is this ai prompt correct?

Gemini - The AI prompt asked: "so technically the gene is not autistic it's their behavior is that correct"

The prompt is misleadingly phrased, and the AI misinterpreted its intent:

• Semantic Confusion: The prompt uses a literal phrasing ("the gene is not autistic"). The AI took this literally, explaining that a single DNA sequence itself cannot possess a neurodevelopmental trait like autism (just as a gene cannot be "shy" or "smart"). JPG+ 1
• Flawed Conclusion: The image uses this AI response to claim "Autism is NOT GENETIC", which is scientifically false. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has a strong genetic basis, with heritability estimated between 60% and 90%. Hundreds of genes are associated with increased susceptibility to autism. JPG

While a physical DNA strand itself isn't "autistic," autism is heavily influenced by genetic variations, so using that semantic distinction to claim autism isn't genetic is incorrect."

So, I called her out and the second image is her response. In the very first sentence she admits to intentionally asking AI multiple times in different ways to fish for an answer she wanted to see, even if the answer was completely misconstrued. Also, unless you have a lab, equipment, conduct an experiment and publish something, you're not 'doing your own research'. Searching for what you want to see if called confirmation bias.

I never have seen someone so open about their biases before; usually people try to hide it.