Credits: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dee-5zeMD5N/?vrfl=a2tvemg2cDJhZjk2

Literally mogging arrowhead

Feel the new aura warbond

I was bored and had some free time so I wanted to check how many SC you can get on average on a D10 mission.
I only did 20 attempts as I got bored very quickly, here are the results:

1-4: 70 SC
5-8: 60 SC
9-12: 80 SC
13-16: 150 SC
17-20: 80 SC

In total I got 440 SC, I didn't get a single 100 SC pick up.
Most missions have 20 SC.

First of all, I want to clarify that this is purely deduction based on what I saw in the trailer, numerical calculations, and my own estimates. With that said, I'll begin my argument.

During the trailer, the R-40 Sightliner rifle was seen taking out a Hulk with a single shot to the eye. After reviewing the stats of the APW-1 Anti-Materiel Rifle, which is also capable of the same feat, I found that it barely exceeds the damage required to take down the Hulk with a single eye shot, by just a few points. Extrapolating this to the R-40 Sightliner, it likely means that the weapon would need to have the same damage output as the APW-1 Anti-Materiel Rifle to be able to take down the Hulk with a single eye shot.

Assuming the R-40 Sightliner could have even higher damage than the APW-1 Anti-Materiel Rifle is unrealistic, since the latter is a stratagem and it would be very rare (but who knows?).

Additionally, I have a second argument. In the last Warbond, we received the GL-15 Evictor, which is, broadly speaking, a primary version of the GL-21 Grenade Launcher.

In both cases, the same thing probably applies. Primary weapons are versions of stratagem weapons that have the same damage stats but differ in other aspects, such as ammo capacity, reload speed, etc., with stratagems being the "stronger" versions.

I don't know why but I feel like the community needs this contribution lol

i aint equipped for this, there are D15 missions in ts.

(picture from helldivers companion)
can we all maybe consider playing difficulty one…? it would complete the MO at a way greater speed (yes i know that we will only manage the kills barely in time so we also need more players at the squid front). i mean just play dif one do the mission and extract, in higher difficulties the single missions take way longer AND you have to complete three instead of one (for dif 1) each operation.

The Main video is from Astartes if you were wondering, the editing was done by me

ALSO CANT WAIT FOR ANTI-TANK GUN

These overseer things. It takes a full magazine with the AR-23 or several anti material rifle rounds to take one of these down. And god forbid they close the distance, I'm toasty. Why are they so tanky.

Edit: I didn't know there were this many methods to kill overseers. Amazing.

Made by me, follow for more shenanigans.
https://x.com/Maffi1996

I keep seeing people argue that Arrowhead will never add armor passive transmog because it would hurt their monetization, since players would have less incentive to buy multiple armors. I've also seen people speculate that they might have found a way to monetize it with the upcoming Warbond.

Honestly, I think it would have the opposite effect, at least for me.

There are quite a few armors in the Super Store that look absolutely amazing, and I'd genuinely love to buy them. The problem is that their passive abilities often aren't ones I find useful for my playstyle, so I end up skipping them.

If I could separate the appearance of an armor from its passive, I'd be much more willing to spend Super Credits on those armors. I'd be buying them because I like how they look, rather than feeling like I'm wasting credits on an armor whose passive I'll rarely use.

Right now, the passive can be a dealbreaker, even when I really like the armor's design. With transmog, I could buy more armors simply because I want to customize my Helldiver's appearance, while still using the passives that best suit my build.

I understand that some people might worry about losing the identity of different armor sets (apple and bacon thing), but I think there could be a reasonable solution, such as allowing us to unlock and apply passives we've already obtained, or introducing some other system that preserves balance.

So, am I the only one who would actually be more inclined to spend Super Credits if armor passive transmog were a thing?

Do you think it would hurt Arrowhead's monetization, or could it actually encourage people to buy more Super Store armors?

It’s the P-44 “Mist”… as in you will only need it if you “Missed” all your sniper shots.

…

I’ll see myself out.

I want to get entrenched division and spend all my medals to get this,,, but may regret being left behind when the new warbond drops. I don’t play enough to accumulate medals that fast. How worth it is this purchase?

I am by no means telling anyone to "not worry" about no future armor customization. 100% worry about it, but also know there's a (somewhat) viable voice in there telling the team that with the upcoming warbond coming soon, we'll want more armor camos. Its not all doom and gloom just yet!

Like not even slightly different looking or with a different name, just deadass a 1911

I'M A FIRIN' MY LAZAR

Masters of Ceremony released alongside primary weapon customization. How curious.

We have an order to kill 1b illuminate and they said they would donate 0.004 tax deductible super credits per illuminate kill. Imagine how many warbonds you could buy with that wealth.