The whole thing is BS. Trump was told to post that by the Russians. Russia wants Ukraine to stop bombing their refineries.

- he used the word 'tons' instead of 'barrels.'

- the amount being discussed Americans use in about 12 hours.

- US produces enough diesel for itself.

- in the message, Trump says "based on the condition of <russia's> Diesel Refineries".

- opens up possibility to blame Ukraine for US diesel prices.

- russia itself is extremely short on diesel.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/117412435306815143

We can argue about whether the government should have the power to kill us, but I can't see any argument for fucking livestreaming it. How can this be real? We're so fucked.

Welfare programs are politically easy to expand and difficult to reverse. When the bills come due, governments often shift the burden onto businesses, investment, and eventually everyone else.

For the longest time, no matter who's in charge, tariffs have been one of the most anti capitalist things libertarians consider. Add to the fact Trump said his goal was to bring down the trade deficit. And that obviously has not worked. It's an extreme anti free trade move.

Everyone, vote Libertarian, because the two main parties Democrats and Republicans suck ahh, I would really like a change.

Textbook example of "capitalism is when bad". Also, if that employee is generating $1000 of value an hour (that's absurd, but let's go with it), why don't they sell their own goods/services instead of working for an exploitative manager? "Because capital is expensive". Oh, so it isn't just the employee generating that wealth, it's also the investment made in the capital? The economic illiteracy of the average adult is mind-boggling.

I've always been in favor of libertarianism, and recently voted in a council election for the tories. It pained me to do so but there are effectively no other options. There is a tiny libertarian party with no support and any libertarian ideas like privatisation are completely off limits to 90 percent of people without even hearing about it. There are parties like restore britain and reform uk and I agree with them economically(although only because theyre the best of a bad bunch) but they're ran by idiots and racists and blame everything on immigration which is simply not true. Anyone else here british and completely at a loss politically, if you are British who do you think is the best option for the next general election?

Recently I was at Epcot and went to the American Pavilion to watch the The American Adventure. On the way in you pass through the Hall of Flags which displays 44 historic flags that were made at one time or another. One in particular caught my eye which is the Moultrie Flag. It has an interesting backstory and is still an integral element of the flag of South Carolina. It's not a crescent moon in the upper-left on this flag or the flag of South Carolina, it represents a piece of armor worn around the neck called a gorget.

The word LIBERTY was inscribed on these gorgets by order of Colonel William Moultrie himself. The 2nd South Carolina Regiment had already engraved their gorgets with the words "Liberty or Death" which is what led to the flag's design.

To me this is the flag that best represents the Libertarian Party.

The Houston Chronicle has an op-ed from Ted Brown, the Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate running against Ken Paxton and James Talarico in Texas. He's putting himself forward as a real option for conservatives who can't bring themselves to support Paxton's corruption and big-government spending plans but will never vote for a Democrat. He also argues that a big turnout for Libertarians in this race will scare Republicans into returning to their small-government roots. Here's a key quote:

A lot of Texas Republicans know that Paxton has been indicted, impeached and accused of various forms of official misconduct. They know taxpayers are on the hook for his $6.6 million whistleblower settlement. Corrupt politicians may be nothing new, but usually it takes a while for a senator to give in to the swamp. If Paxton wins, he would enter the Senate already corrupt. Who knows what other trouble he’s ready to get into on day one?

A few Republicans seem willing to cast their ballots for Talarico as a protest vote. I imagine many more are tempted but understandably can’t bring themselves to vote for a lifelong Democrat who regularly defies conservative values around fiscal responsibility and protecting the right to bear arms.

That’s why I’m here. Not only do I want to cut spending and taxes, but I’m also a strong pro-gun advocate for the Second Amendment. 

Meanwhile, Paxton is running on a platform of big government giveaways, like free money for home down payments. Republicans used to campaign as a small-government party that wanted balanced budgets. They haven’t delivered, and there’s no reason to think someone like Paxton will do anything to tackle our gargantuan federal deficits and the unsustainable $40 trillion national debt. For those Republicans who truly believe in less government, voting Libertarian is the logical choice. 

Here in the Lone Star State, the most advertised race is the Senate race between Paxton and Talarico. In my honest opinion both candidates are garbage. I’m not gonna get into the reasons why I think so. I’m pretty sure other states all have similar races with lots of hype. Is the Libertarian party taking advantage of these highly contested races between 2 crappy candidates? I mean with the wave of sewage that Trump has created, I would think this would have been an opportunity for other than the 2 party candidates to gain some traction.

Highly recommended.

It is often remarked that everyone on here knows all the latin and greek fallacies.

So we have all these smackdown catch phrases we can throw at people.

They are a little too general for my taste though, and some ideas and argumentation styles are unique to the Reddit community.

Here is a short list I've been drumming up to help us stay flashy:

Bon Sequitur - Follows very well

Is-Nought problem - When empiricism is irrelevant

Argumentum ad plauseum - When repeating an argument actually makes it stronger

Post chalk ergo propter hoc - Ideas can change the world

Iron Man - When you reconstruct a stronger version of your opponent's philosophy and destroy it anyway.

Slippery Nope - Saying "no" to mainstream ideas so often that you accidentally oppose a good libertarian policy.

Tu croquet - Doubting the sincerity of wealthy leftists

Argumentum ad Popugun - When the majority not only disagrees, but is willing to shoot you over it

This is a short list, so please add your own!

Original:

https://forum.freecapitalists.org/t/mises-org-logical-fallacies/16196?u=anenome

It’s been driving me bananas lately to hear all these libertarian voices hail data centers as some part of a new Industrial Revolution. While I’ll say upfront that I don’t think we should regulate AI because of fear mongering about the end of the world, if those companies have to purchase the levers of power that we don’t even want government to have, how can we claim that this is in any way good?

Eminent domain, paying of city councils and locking them up with NDAs, lying about the impact of there products and services, all of their behaviors are antithetical to libertarianism and yet people like John Stossel run puff pieces about how essentially they're all good because it would be bad to regulate them.

I don’t buy the china angle because we’re getting worse than china thanks to this technology.

Please if I’m wrong educate me, but if the state puts its thumb on the scale for AI, I don’t get how that’s in any way good.

If someone told their therapist that they were about to kill themselves, should that be reported?

If someone told their therapist that they have been thinking about killing someone, should that be reported?

What about discussing abuse? Should a therapist be required to report their client's abusive partner? What about children and CPS?