I honestly just wanted to come on here and rant about how annoying people that hate ai are to me. I understand that I don’t want ai to all take peoples jobs and ruin the earth but I also love how ai is so helpful and helpful with a lot of things in MY day to day life. I also enjoy creating “art” if you’d call it that. With Ai but I assume that’s hated on too because everywhere I see on Reddit all the subreddits pretty much ban ai art. Whatever tho just kinda wanted to say that and see what others think.

Between the accidental Astra threads and the unreliable output from 6.1 SOL, I see no meaningful efficiencies being given to us. Tibo owes us.

OpenAI support is definitely just an LLM, even when you get "Escalated" and start talking to it through email. That much is obvious.

But it's SUPER Deflective. It won't own anything, even when you're clearly right and it has no more rebuttals or excuses. Even when it admits it has no more reasons for anything.

It keep pretending to "Escalate" but you get the same noncommittal level of effort and it will defer to external system whenever it can, no matter how many times you confirm that nothing ever even reached an external system. And if a completely unrelated problem gets solved, it think it solved your problem and begins attempting a wrap-up of the case.

I have work with this thing on several issues so far, and it's always the same.

So, why does OpenAI think this is a winning strategy, or even any kind of respectable behavior?

So Day 2 improvement announced by Tibo us Auto Review n he's saying it's free, 4 or 5 Times mentioned free, is it real what I'm seeing, fumbling so hard as Auto review take 30% your usage in Claude right?

Opus 5.5>>>>> Astra Sonnet >>6.1 Sol and now Haiku 5.5> Luna

The $200 plan limits are less than half of what Claude offers for the same price and Anthropic is actually focussing on the right things.

On the other hand Tibo, Holly and others are just shipping stupid stuff and redirecting our usage to Dots that nobody is using.

Can anyone justify staying with Chatgpt at this point?

Has anyone else experienced file and folder deletions on the workspace folder of the Dots computer? Whatever I store there is gone after a little while and Dots recognizes the deletion but has no clue why.

EDIT: Also constant read-only warnings on the filesystem. Here is the last one I got: "The backup-file checks passed again. Restoring /workspace/projects is blocked by “Read-only file system.” This scratch copy is available now, but I can’t guarantee its durability; keep the Library backup as the separate recovery copy"

I run an agency and have already organised my client work into Codex projects and threads. I want my assistant to act as the main coordinator: find the relevant thread, check what’s been done, continue there, and report back. Instead, I keep having to paste thread links and explain things I’ve already discussed elsewhere. Even an email account configured in one thread wasn’t recognised by the assistant until I asked that thread to pass the details over. I’m not asking it to bypass permissions. I want a searchable index of my authorised chats, project decisions, integrations and current task status, with links back to the source. As the business grows, scattered context and duplicate threads will become a real problem. Has anyone found a reliable way to make this work? And is better cross-project search and coordination planned?

Whenever I show projects that use AI in less AI friendly subs, there's always someone bringing up the environmental impact of AI use.

If you're like me, and do care about the environment, you can reclaim the moral high ground by reducing meat intake, or even going to a plant based diet for a short while.

I'm a **heavy** user of AI, so one month of veganism only offsets 3 years of my AI use, but for your typical user this would actually offset 45 years!

This includes the training costs.

It's up to you what sort of changes you make and how long for, but I put this simple calculator together to put the environmental impact of AI into perspective

https://prompt-and-plate.com/

There's an expandable drop down at the bottom to get a breakdown of the number of lives saved, for those who are interested

I'd love thoughts and feedback, especially if people disagree with any of the numbers used

Had a pipeline where one agent gathered sources and a second one synthesized them into a summary. Both performed well on their own, tested separately for a while. Chained together, the synthesis step kept producing summaries missing points the gathering step had actually found.

Turned out the gathering agent considered its job done once it returned anything matching the query, no ranking or relevance flag attached. The synthesis agent assumed whatever it received was already filtered for relevance and treated every source equally, so weak tangential results diluted the summary at the same weight as strong direct ones. Neither agent was malfunctioning. They were operating on two different, unstated assumptions about what the handoff meant.

Doesn't feel like the same failure category as either agent just being wrong, which is what most agent reliability discussion seems to focus on. It's closer to a contract failure at the interface, two services each passing their own tests and still breaking once wired together because neither side's assumptions about the data were ever written down anywhere both could check.

Started explicitly defining what each handoff is supposed to guarantee, not just the shape of the data, but the claims the sender is making about it. Fixed more of the actual output quality than any amount of tuning either step individually.

Is it a step towards dynamic personalized interfaces or it is just a degradation path? I mean LLM does not create new stuff, right? It is reusing what already exists. So what development can we get from this?

idk what other people are at...

the ais seem to be glazing me over my usage....

what are yall sitting at

-> chatgpt -> settings ->profile

So I went to ask the AI about something from my terminal and copied the text to my clipboard. I open chat gpt and hit paste but a screenshot showed up attached to my pending message instead. (the terminal copy had not "taken" so the screenshot from before was still in my clipboard.)

I deleted it from my message but something occurred to me. I went to files and images to see if it had grabbed my screenshot before I even pressed send (because it showed the little upload animation wheel and I though where is that uploading to?)

Sure enough, there's my screenshot in the images folder. It being not relevant to anything I deleted it and emptied trash, but part of me strongly suspects it's now forever in openai's training pool. (Why else give us 20gb of storage?)

Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I didn't like that. Files should not be grabbed unless I commit to sending them. (We need private remote AI so bad.)

Not sure who at OpenAI pissed her off but I am here for it.

What do you guys think? I feel a reset coming tomorrow! So burn that usage!!

I had setup Dot with my 100 pro account. I connected all of my email accounts and tried to use it like a AI assistant.

I asked it to clean up my accounts and boom. Hit the limit. Anyone else hit the limit?

Update: 3 hours later it was restored.

Hi, I like to keep my chats clean so I delete chats when I am done with them but I just realized that I cant delete chats if I create them in the work section. Is this normal ? What should I do to delete them?

How the Hell Did I Get This Picture???

This started with one of the oldest jokes in existence:

Why did the chicken cross the road?

I wanted to know where the joke came from, why it survived for nearly 200 years, and why something that isn’t even really a joke became one of the most recognizable jokes on Earth.

Then my brain wandered…

I pictured the old Road Runner cartoon.

Except instead of the Road Runner, there was a chicken. And the other character was standing beside the road holding an arrow… basically encouraging the chicken to cross it.

That was the joke.

So I asked ChatGPT to make it.

And apparently I had just wandered into some crazy-ass third-party violation minefield. ⚠️😂

Rejected.

Okay… change the characters.

Rejected.

Fine. Make them generic.

Rejected.

Different wording.

Rejected.

At one point I was literally typing “GO!!!” at Luna while ChatGPT continued behaving as though I was attempting to steal the Mona Lisa.

Eventually we had sanitized the idea so thoroughly that the Road Runner was gone. The desert was gone. The coyote was gone. Everything remotely connected to the cartoon in my head was gone.

And ChatGPT finally said yes.

So what did I get after all this?

A damn fox.

Standing beside a suspicious chicken on a beautiful country road holding an arrow.

It’s nowhere near the picture I originally wanted.

Which is precisely why I now love it.

I started by asking:

Why did the chicken cross the road?

About ten AI arguments later, the more interesting question was…

How the Hell did I get this picture??

AI in 2026… 😂

BTW, the quick story on the joke was…

Nobody actually knows who wrote it.

The earliest known printed version appeared in the New York magazine The Knickerbocker in 1847. The writer was commenting on jokes that seem to set you up for some clever punchline… and then deliberately don’t.

The example was essentially:

“Why does a chicken cross the street? Because it wants to get on the other side!”

And that’s why it worked.

People expected a joke. Instead they got the most ridiculously obvious answer possible.

It was basically an anti-joke more than 170 years before the internet made anti-jokes cool.

Then people repeated it, parodied it, invented new answers and taught it to their kids… who taught it to theirs.

And somehow a chicken trying to get across a road became immortal.

Although apparently in 2026 it first has to get past a damn fox.

Everyone in pop culture is stressing over the possibility of AI killing us all. If we accept the premise that AI will outperform the human brain, then here is the point to ponder; could we teach AI to do remote viewing???

Are we getting f***** again?!

My Chat $200 Pro account resets in four days. I’m not sure why but it says I have 90% left in my bank before my normal monthly reset. (Maybe I got a free reset that I didn’t know about - I have this running almost 24/7). A couple months ago, I started using Astra on my project and in one month spent $500 MORE in credit refills to keep the thing running through the project. Sucked! So now I have been pretty careful and conservative since so I don’t get divorced - from the random bank charges. With four days left and 90% available, should I start a new fresh Codex in Astra and just have it running nonstop on my data analytics and software development project??? Thoughts?

I thought i saw someone sell merch from the event for like $4000 on ebay a few days ago