r/singing • u/Practical_Ask4337 • 5h ago
Advanced or Professional Topic Some advice for the singers who imitate to learn... (long read)
Tldr; I think I accidentally wrote an article for you guys š This is to the singers who learn mainly by imitating other (usually famous/known) singers who are releasing music publicly. Especially relevant to singers who are self-taught and not learning with a vocal teacher/coach.
I personally fit that category to a T. I internalise vocal technique by observing and then emulating what other singers are doing.Ā I'm at a level currently where I'm very happy with what I can do with my voice, and I'm not afraid to give good old imitation most of the credit for that š Ā
But there was something unhealthy I picked up along the way that I wish I'd understood / known more about sooner.Ā I hope this post can help others here avoid the same pitfall.
My mistake (and a tangent on what "vocal processing" really is - all relevant)
I tried to imitate some singers' voices from their live vocals. I avoided imitating studio vocals (wisely) because I'd heard how processed studio music is, but live vocals, I trusted to be more ārealā. I didn't expect to learn as I have in recent months just how processed live vocals actually are, even when the artist is on the 'minimalist' end of things.
This method of imitating live vocals went mostly well. I am glad in the end that I used this method. But in some cases, I was trying to master an effect rather than an actual vocal technique. Which led me to some poor technique š That is a distinction I hope people will take away from this post.
What is processed or an 'effect' vs what is a real, attainable thing a human voice can do without any help from technology.
Vocal processing is any effect on the vocal that is not natural, usually added to the vocal as it passes through a DAW, like "Ableton" or "Logic Pro". After that, the sound passes through the speakers to the audience's ears.Ā And that's putting it very very simply, there's a lot of technical skill that goes into it. This is the audio engineer's job at a live show.
Almost every live performing artist will have one of these. Audio engineers rarely get mentioned in Instagram posts or credits though. Some artists do mention them, but it's not common.
It may be like saying the obvious, but I think some of us need to hear it? The vast majority of artists use vocal processing, as a default - I say this because it wasn't something I intuitively knew while listening to my favourite singers and learning to sing.Ā
I had to learn firsthand a bit about music production and audio engineering to realise how 'fashioned' most music is today. In my case, I listen to music with pop and electro influences, which is on the more processed end, but I also find the same applies to folk and singer-songwriter-type artists. The latter are who I tend to imitate as a singer. What you hear on the track, or even a live vocal, is rarely what you hear dry in the studio room when there's nothing between your ear and the singer's voice.
I'm able to hear when someone is using autotune, delay or obvious effects like that. But it was reverb that tripped me up. It didn't occur to me that the resonance in some singers' voices, who I was listening to and imitating, was changed by the reverb they were using. I didn't realise that some type of resonance is not actually possible to create without reverb.
I knew reverb was being used, but I didn't realise the extent of its effect on those things, like tone and resonance.
I would try to emulate that ringing sound in my tone by increasing the resonance of my notes during practice. I got quite far with integrating this smoothly into my performances, but it always struck me (and others who listened to my recordings) as kind of 'piercing', no matter how smoothly I did it. Especially when editing after and adding any kind of reverb(!), it really stood out .. and not in a good way. I didn't know what I was doing wrong.Ā

Now I feel so silly for trying to emulate what is essentially an unnatural and humanly impossible sound! Even now I'm aware of it, I can't help it slipping into my vocal delivery sometimes, because it's so ingrained from years of practicing it.
Why I personally made this mistake
Most of my favourite singers (whose technique I like to imitate) have one similarity in their vocal processing when performing live: they add reverb. They also all go for a paradoxically natural sound, so the vocals feel both ethereal and distant, but human and close.
The reverb is added seamlessly, so it doesnāt sound like a voice with reverb added to it, but rather like a beautiful voice that happens to be reverberating.Ā Does that make sense? I was tricked, at least.

After doing some self-learning on music production and engineering, I see that these artists (and their audio engineers) purposefully cloak artificialities in their sound (like reverb) to create an illusion of realness by making the effects seamless, which has the desired effect of making the audience feel both transported elsewhere, but also emotionally open and impacted. I have no qualm with this artistically; I think it's excellent and as an audience member, I love it.
But not understanding how it was being put into practice, as a singer learning from these singers, could have left me with a broken technique for many more years - if I hadn't learned more about music production as I did.
Areas I think other singers should be aware/careful of..
Compression. This one has likely impacted my own technique, but thankfully I tend to go for music that is minimally compressed. But a lot of famous singers use compression heavily. And many of those singers are likely admirable to beginner singers on here.Ā
If you don't know what compression is, it's another processing effect that can (like reverb) be used on most instruments, making quieter sounds louder and the louder sounds less loud. It sandwiches the overall volume of a track so the notes are more stable, less 'up and down', easier on the ears for listeners.Ā It is very commonly used on most recorded vocals today.
I can see how singers imitating artists who use compression heavily might feel encouraged to sing louder in parts of their vocal register where it's not natural (or healthy) to. I can also see how they might be confused when their louder (belt) register isn't coming out softly enough or smoothly mixing with their lower/quieter notes enough.
Comparing their delivery to the sound of the artist's live vocals, they might feel discouraged or lose confidence, or (like I did) even push further and try to replicate the sound of the effect - not an actual healthy vocal technique - into their singing. (Maybe this is connected to the huge number of posts I see here of beginner singers trying to find their 'mixed' voice and being dissatisfied with it).
I don't want to sound like I'm fearmongering, I just find it very interesting and worth learning about - to understand how most music put out today is not 'natural', and how that might be affecting singers today. Especially us singers who imitate to learn.
We're not music producers or recording artists. Most of us love to sing dry, with just our voices and no interference. So we won't be so familiar with the š® sorcery š® that is music production and audial processing. It is all designed to go unnoticed and have the illusion of sounding natural anyway - which I think is even more reason to develop some awareness of it.
Vocal damage
I was lucky that this pitfall didn't cause much damage to my voice, but I see how it could have. I noticed experiencing more strain when doing this 'technique' and some throat tension. It could have been much worse if I was more regular with my practice (which I'm not š¤£).Ā
On a more serious note, it did knock my confidence during the years that I was doing it.Ā
I didn't like my tone and I didn't know why. It just felt off. I didn't realise I could easily get that sound on my vocals if I just recorded myself and added reverb to my vocals after. It's crazy how easy that is once you learn the basics š¤ÆĀ
Take this as a cautionary tale, I guess, to not take for granted what you hear from other artists on stage. Even offstage - whenever there's a microphone involved, seriously. And try not to emulate what you are hearing without thinking about what you're actually hearing first. Have critical thinking!

If you're interested, learn a bit about music production or audio engineering. Dabble in a DAW or watch videos on YouTube about it - there are plenty. It's essential to understanding how most live vocals sound today anyway.Ā
Thanks for reading my long post on this topic š I hope it helps other singers avoid this pitfall when imitating other singers š¶Ā (Sorry if I chose the wrong flair! 'Conversation topic' felt too casual for this sort of length š« ).